Feasibility of Prospective Assignment of Initial Method of Detection of Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of standardized, prospective assignment of initial method of detection (MOD) of breast cancer by radiologists in diverse practice settings. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed the rate of assignment of MOD in four geographically varied health systems. A universal protocol for basic MOD assignment was agreed upon by the authors before start of the pilot study. Radiologists at each site were instructed how to assign MOD. Charts were then reviewed to determine the frequency and accuracy of MOD assignment for all cases subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer. When available, data regarding frequency of tumor registry abstraction were also reviewed for frequency and accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 2,328 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer were evaluated across the sites over the study period. Of these patients, initial MOD was prospectively assigned by the radiologist in 94% of cases. Of the cases in which MOD was assigned, retrospective review confirmed accurate assignment in 96% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective, standardized assignment of initial MOD of breast cancer is feasible across different practice sites and can be accurately captured in tumor registries. Standard collection of MOD would provide critical data about the impact of screening mammography in the United States.

Physician Ordering of Screening Ultrasound: National Rates and Association With State-Level Breast Density Reporting Laws.

PURPOSE: To describe factors associated with screening ultrasound ordering and determine whether adoption of state-level breast density reporting laws was associated with changes in ordering rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cohort study using National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data for 2007 to 2015. We included preventive office visits for women aged 40 to 74 years without breast symptoms and signs or additional reasons requiring ultrasound ordering. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify changes in ultrasound ordering rates pre- versus post-state-level density reporting laws, accounting for patient-, physician-, and practice-level characteristics. Analyses were weighted to account for the multistage probability sampling design of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. RESULTS: Our sample included 12,787 visits over the 9-year study period. Overall, 28.9% (3,370 of 12,787) of women underwent a breast examination and 22.1% (2,442 of 12,787) had a screening mammogram ordered. Only 3.3% (379 of 12,787) had screening ultrasound ordered. Screening ultrasounds were ordered more frequently for younger women (rate ratio [RR] 0.8 per 10-year increase in age, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-0.9, P = .003) and at urban practices (RR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1-5.0, P = .028), and less frequently in practices with computer reminders for ordering screening tests (RR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, P = .024). In multivariate analyses, the rate of ultrasound ordering did not change after adoption of density notification laws (RR 0.7, 95% CI: 0.3-2.0, P = .57). CONCLUSION: The rate of screening ultrasound ordering remains low over time. There was no observed association between adoption of state-level density reporting laws and overall changes in ultrasound ordering.

A Checklist Manifesto: Effectiveness of Checklist Use in Hands-On Simulation Examining Competency in Contrast Reaction Management in a Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess the performance of a contrast reaction management checklist for optimal management of a contrast reaction scenario created using a high-fidelity hands-on simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A safety checklist was designed that presented the five adverse events that most commonly occur after administration of IV contrast medium as well as their step-by-step management. Forty-three radiology residents were randomized into two groups, a checklist group (n = 22) and a control group (n = 21), as stratified by postgraduate year. Participants took written tests involving multiple-choice questions 2 months before and immediately after participating in the high-fidelity simulation scenario, which was videotaped and independently evaluated by three graders. RESULTS: Both groups had similar scores on the multiple-choice question tests taken before and after participation in the simulation (p = 0.35 and p = 0.62, respectively). In the simulation, the checklist group scored significantly higher than the control group with regard to their overall management of a severe contrast reaction (85.1% vs 64.8%; p = 0.001), including individual scores for first-line treatment of bronchospasm (97.0% vs 91.3%; p = 0.035) and use of the correct route of administration and dose of epinephrine (77.3% vs 45.2%; p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: A standardized contrast reaction management checklist can reduce the number of treatment errors that occur during a simulated severe contrast reaction, particularly with regard to proper administration of epinephrine and treatment of bronchospasm. Such a checklist could be used by radiologists, technologists, and nurses to improve patient safety as a result of improved contrast reaction management and teamwork skills.

Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening: Implications of Breast Density.

The approach to breast cancer screening has changed over time from a general approach to a more personalized, risk-based approach. Women with dense breasts, one of the most prevalent risk factors, are now being informed that they are at increased risk of developing breast cancer and should consider supplemental screening beyond mammography. This article reviews the current evidence regarding the impact of breast density relative to other known risk factors, the evidence regarding supplemental screening for women with dense breasts, supplemental screening options, and recommendations for physicians having shared decision-making discussions with women who have dense breasts.

Are Physicians Influenced by Their Own Specialty Society's Guidelines Regarding Mammography Screening? An Analysis of Nationally Representative Data.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether primary care physicians were influenced by their own specialty society's mammography screening recommendations after the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's (USPSTF) revised recommendations were released. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an analysis of cross-sectional nationally representative data for 2007-2012 from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). All office-based preventive services visits for women 40 years old or older were included. Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify changes over time in the mammography referral rate per 1000 visits by physician specialty, adjusting for patient- and office-level covariates. All analyses were weighted to account for the multistage probability sampling design of NAMCS. RESULTS: Our analysis represented an average of 35,947,290 office visits per year. Overall, between 2007-2008 and 2011-2012, mammography referral rates (per 1000 visits) decreased from 285 to 215 referrals (-25.0% adjusted change; p = 0.006). The largest decrease was among family physicians (from 230 to 128; -49.0% adjusted change; p < 0.001), followed by internal medicine physicians (from 135 to 79; -45.8% adjusted change; p = 0.038). No statistically significant change was noted among obstetricians and gynecologists over time (from 476 to 419; -14.4% adjusted change; p = 0.23). DISCUSSION: Family and internal medicine physicians, whose societies adhered to 2009 USPSTF recommendations for biennial screening starting at age 50 years, showed statistically significant decreases in mammography referral rates over time. Obstetricians and gynecologists, whose society continued to recommend annual screening starting at age 40 years, showed no statistically significant change in mammography referral rates over time. Physicians may be influenced by their own society's recommendations, which may influence their shared decision-making discussions with patients.

Comparison of the extended isotropic periodic sum and particle mesh Ewald methods for simulations of lipid bilayers and monolayers.

3D-IPS/DFFT is an extension of the three-dimensional isotropic periodic sum (3D-IPS) for evaluation of electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions in heterogeneous systems; it utilizes a discrete fast Fourier transform (DFFT) for efficient calculation of the IPS potential with a large local region radius. The method is demonstrated to be highly accurate for simple bulk fluids, liquid/liquid and liquid/vapor interfaces, and lipid bilayers and monolayers. Values for r(C) (the cutoff distance for direct evaluation of pairs) and R(C) (the local region radius) equal to 10 A and twice the longest edge of the periodic cell, respectively, provide excellent efficiency and accuracy. Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) monolayers simulated with the CHARMM (Chemistry at HARvard Molecular Mechanics) C27r lipid parameter set and 3D-IPS/DFFT yield surface tensions approximately 8 dyn/cm higher than those simulated using particle mesh Ewald (PME), and with experiment. In contrast, surface tensions for DMPC bilayers are 16 dyn/cm/leaflet with both 3D-IPS/DFFT (r(C) = 10 and 12 A) and PME (r(C) = 12 A). This indicates that PME (r(C) = 12 A) may be used for simulations of bilayers, but not monolayers, and that the large bilayer surface tension arising from C27r is incorrect.