Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 36, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the time interval between alfentanil and rocuronium administration, at a 50% probability of preventing pain-induced withdrawal movement from rocuronium injection (TimeAR50). METHODS: A total of 64 patients scheduled for general anesthesia were enrolled in this study (33 men and 31 women). Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol, at an effect-site target concentration of 3 µg/mL. Then, alfentanil 15 µg/kg was injected for 30 s. After 60 s, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered to the first patient. The Dixon's up-and-down method was used to determine the time interval for each subsequent patient (interval of 5 s). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at three time points: T0, pre-induction; T1, before rocuronium injection; and T2, 1 min after rocuronium injection. RESULTS: The TimeAR50 ± standard deviation (SD) was 5.6 ± 3.7 s and 21.9 ± 5.6 s in the male and female patients, respectively. Based on the probit regression, the TimeAR50 was 4.7 s (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-7.6 s) and 20.3 s (95% CI, 7.7-26.1 s) in the male and female patients, respectively. The TimeAR95 was 10.6 s (95% CI, 7.7-25.3 s) and 35.0 s (95% CI, 28.1-95.5 s) in the male and female patients, respectively, with significantly higher values in females than in males (P < 0.001). Compared with the T0, MAP and HR decreased significantly at T1 and T2 in both groups. CONCLUSION: The TimeAR50 required for preventing rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement were 4.7 s and 20.3 s in male and female patients, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry on April 7, 2021 (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn . Registry number: ChiCTR2100045137 ) .


Subject(s)
Alfentanil/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Movement/drug effects , Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents/adverse effects , Pain/prevention & control , Rocuronium/adverse effects , Adult , Arterial Pressure/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Humans , Male , Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Rocuronium/therapeutic use , Sex Factors , Time
2.
Ann Bot ; 109(4): 735-45, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22271925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To date, most floral nectarins (nectar proteins) are reported to function in nectar defence, particularly for insect-pollinated outcrossing species. We compared nectarin composition and abundance in selfing common tobacco (Nicotiana tobaccum) with outcrossing ornamental tobacco plants to elucidate the functional difference of nectarins in different reproductive systems. METHODS: Common tobacco (CT) nectarins were separated by SDS-PAGE and the N terminus of the most abundant nectarin was sequenced via Edman degradation. The full-length nectarin gene was amplified and cloned from genomic DNA and mRNA with hiTail-PCR and RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends), and expression patterns were then investigated in different tissues using semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Additionally, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic analyses of nectar sugar composition, and other biochemical traits and functions of the novel nectarin were studied. KEY RESULTS: The most abundant nectarin in CT nectar is an acidic α-galactosidase, here designated NTα-Gal. This compound has a molecular mass of 40 013 Da and a theoretical pI of 5·33. NTα-Gal has a conserved α-Gal characteristic signature, encodes a mature protein of 364 amino acids and is expressed in different organs. Compared with 27 other melliferous plant species from different families, CT floral nectar demonstrated the highest α-Gal activity, which is inhibited by d-galactose. Raffinose family oligosaccharides were not detected in CT nectar, indicating that NTα-Gal does not function in post-secretory hydrolysis. Moreover, tobacco plant fruits did not develop intact skin with galactose inhibition of NTα-Gal activity in nectar, suggesting that NTα-Gal induces cell-wall surface restructuring during the initial stages of fruit development. CONCLUSIONS: α-Gal was the most abundant nectarin in selfing CT plants, but was not detected in the nectar of strictly outcrossing sister tobacco species. No function was demonstrated in antimicrobial defence. Therefore, floral nectarins in selfing species maintain their functional significance in reproductive organ development.


Subject(s)
Nicotiana/enzymology , Plant Nectar/chemistry , Plant Proteins/metabolism , alpha-Galactosidase/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Base Sequence , China , Cloning, Molecular , DNA, Plant/analysis , DNA, Plant/genetics , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Molecular Sequence Data , Plant Nectar/metabolism , Plant Proteins/chemistry , Plant Proteins/genetics , Nicotiana/chemistry , Nicotiana/genetics , alpha-Galactosidase/chemistry , alpha-Galactosidase/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...