Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Med Imaging ; 21(1): 36, 2021 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622277

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the value of radiomics parameters derived from contrast enhanced (CE) MRI in differentiation of hypovascular non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (hypo-NF-pNETs) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPNs). METHODS: Fifty-seven SPN patients and twenty-two hypo-NF-pNET patients were enrolled. Radiomics features were extracted from T1WI, arterial, portal and delayed phase of MR images. The enrolled patients were divided into training cohort and validation cohort with the 7:3 ratio. We built four radiomics signatures for the four phases respectively and ROC analysis were used to select the best phase to discriminate SPNs from hypo-NF-pNETs. The chosen radiomics signature and clinical independent risk factors were integrated to construct a clinic-radiomics nomogram. RESULTS: SPNs occurred in younger age groups than hypo-NF-pNETs (P < 0.0001) and showed a clear preponderance in females (P = 0.0185). Age was a significant independent factor for the differentiation of SPNs and hypo-NF-pNETs revealed by logistic regression analysis. With AUC values above 0.900 in both training and validation cohort (0.978 [95% CI, 0.942-1.000] in the training set, 0.907 [95% CI, 0.765-1.000] in the validation set), the radiomics signature of the arterial phase was picked to build a clinic-radiomics nomogram. The nomogram, composed by age and radiomics signature of the arterial phase, showed sufficient performance for discriminating SPNs and hypo-NF-pNETs with AUC values of 0.965 (95% CI, 0.923-1.000) and 0.920 (95% CI, 0.796-1.000) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Delong Test did not demonstrate statistical significance between the AUC of the clinic-radiomics nomogram and radiomics signature of arterial phase. CONCLUSION: CE-MRI-based radiomics approach demonstrated great potential in the differentiation of hypo-NF-pNETs and SPNs.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Nomograms , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Age Factors , Area Under Curve , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution
2.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 43(2): 407-13, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26182908

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of region of interest (ROI) on tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and interobserver variability in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients recruited with pathology-proven PDAC underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, 3.0T) prior to the surgical resection. Two independent readers measured tumor ADCs according to three ROI methods: whole-volume, single-slice, and small solid sample of tumor. Minimum and mean ADCs were obtained. The interobserver variability for each of the three methods was analyzed using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimum and mean ADCs among the ROI methods were compared using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: The single-slice ROI method showed the best reproducibility in the minimum ADC measurements (mean difference ± limits of agreement between two readers were 0.025 ± 0.25 × 10(-3) mm2 /s; ICC, 0.92) among the three ROI methods. For the solid tumor sample ROI, both minimum ADC and mean ADC measurements reproducibility were the worst, with limits of agreement up to ±0.50 × 10(-3) mm2 /s and ±0.32 × 10(-3) mm2 /s, respectively (ICCs, 0.41/0.58). Both the minimum and mean ADCs demonstrated significant differences among the three ROI methods (both P < 0.001). The post-hoc analyses results showed no significant difference with regard to the mean ADCs between whole-volume and single-slice ROI methods (P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: The ROI method had a considerable influence on both the minimum and mean ADC values and the interobserver variability in PDAC. The worst interobserver variability was observed for both the minimum and mean ADCs derived from small solid-sample ROI.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Acad Radiol ; 22(11): 1385-92, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26292914

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To prospectively investigate and compare three techniques of region of interest (ROI) placement for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with surgical pathology-proven PDAC and 18 healthy volunteers were included. Respiratory-triggered single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (b values = 0, 600 s/mm(2)) was used to calculate the ADC maps across all participants. Three readers independently measured the ADCs according to three ROI methods: whole-volume, single-slice, and small solid samples of tumor. Mean ADCs for the healthy pancreas were calculated using three measurements from pancreatic head to tail, and ADCs of distal pancreas to the tumor were also measured. The interobserver variability for the three techniques was measured using the interclass correlation coefficient. The diagnostic performances were calculated and compared using the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). RESULTS: All the ADCs measured from the three ROI placements on PDAC were significantly lower than that from the normal pancreas. ADCs of solid tumor samples were significantly lower than that measured from whole volume or single slice (both P < .001). Only the ADCs measured from the solid sample ROI placements on tumor were observed significantly lower than the ADC of distal pancreatic parenchyma (P = .005). Areas under the ROC for the identification of PDAC, based on small solid samples, single-slice and whole-volume ROIs, respectively, were 0.939, 0.791, and 0.735. CONCLUSIONS: ADC based on the small solid samples of tumor provided the highest diagnostic performance in assessing PDAC and was more accurate than ADCs measured from single-slice or whole-volume ROI.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Echo-Planar Imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Pancreatic Neoplasms
4.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 41(5): 1236-41, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24979657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the monoexponential and biexponential apparent diffusion parameters in different anatomical regions of the healthy pancreas using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: Fifty-seven healthy volunteers (age, 45.0 ± 10.8 years) were recruited. DWI of the pancreas was performed with 9 b-values (0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 s/mm(2) , respectively). The ADC was calculated for all b-values using linear regression yielding ADCtotal . The ADCb value of the monoexponential DWI, slow component of diffusion (ADCslow ), incoherent microcirculation (ADCfast ) and perfusion fraction (f) of the biexponential DWI were calculated for the pancreas head, body and tail. Dependency of the parameters on the anatomical regions was analyzed using Friedman test. RESULTS: All of the mean ADC400 , ADC600 , ADC800 , ADC1000 , ADCtotal and f values differed significantly among the anatomical regions with the lowest values were observed in the tail of pancreas (P < 0.05). The Friedman test results demonstrated a significant decline of the mean ADC values of the monoexponential DWI from b20 to b1000 for the three anatomical regions respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Multi-b-value DWI derived quantitative parameters including ADC400 , ADC600 , ADC800 , ADC1000 , ADCtotal , and f differed significantly among the pancreatic head, body and tail, with the lowest values obtained in the tail.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pancreas/anatomy & histology , Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques/methods , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Motion , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...