Early Intervention of Cold-Water Swimming on Functional Recovery and Spinal Pain Modulation Following Brachial Plexus Avulsion in Rats.

Brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) causes peripheral nerve injury complications with motor and sensory dysfunction of the upper limb. Growing evidence has shown an active role played by cold-water swimming (CWS) in alleviating peripheral neuropathic pain and functional recovery. This study examined whether CWS could promote functional recovery and pain modulation through the reduction of neuroinflammation and microglial overactivation in dorsal horn neurons at the early-stage of BPA. After BPA surgery was performed on rats, they were assigned to CWS or sham training for 5 min twice a day for two weeks. Functional behavioral responses were tested before and after BPA surgery, and each week during training. Results after the two-week training program showed significant improvements in BPA-induced motor and sensory loss (p < 0.05), lower inflammatory cell infiltration, and vacuole formation in injured nerves among the BPA-CWS group. Moreover, BPA significantly increased the expression of SP and IBA1 in dorsal horn neurons (p < 0.05), whereas CWS prevented their overexpression in the BPA-CWS group. The present findings evidenced beneficial rehabilitative effects of CWS on functional recovery and pain modulation at early-stage BPA. The beneficial effects are partially related to inflammatory suppression and spinal modulation. The synergistic role of CWS combined with other management approaches merits further investigation.

Preclinical activity of an i.v. formulation of rubitecan in IDD-P against human solid tumor xenografts.

An i.v. formulation of rubitecan (9-nitrocamptothecin) was evaluated in five human solid tumor xenograft models. Rubitecan in IDD-P, a particulate suspension of the insoluble analog, produced significant tumor growth delay in athymic nude mice bearing A375 melanoma, and MX-1 breast, SKMES non-small-cell lung, Panc-1 pancreatic and HT29 colon carcinomas. The activity of i.v. rubitecan was similar or somewhat superior to those of i.p. regimens with the reference drugs, irinotecan and topotecan. Tumor sensitivity to rubitecan in IDD-P was MX-1>A375>SKMES >Panc-1>HT29. Some complete regression responses were seen with MX-1, A375 and SKMES tumors treated with 2.5 mg/kg on a schedule of two 5-day dosing cycles separated by 2 drug-free days. In nude mice, the MTD of rubitecan in IDD-P lies between 2 and 2.5 mg/kg on this schedule; antitumor efficacy was achieved with doses between 2.5 and 1.25 mg/kg. Dosing with 6.6 mg/kg rubitecan in IDD-P on intermittent schedules (4- or 7-day intervals) was tolerated, but less efficacious, when tested in the A375 model. The good responses obtained with rubitecan in IDD-P suggest it could be used clinically in circumstances where an i.v. formulation offers advantages to oral or aerosol formulations.

GEM 231, a second-generation antisense agent complementary to protein kinase A RIalpha subunit, potentiates antitumor activity of irinotecan in human colon, pancreas, prostate and lung cancer xenografts.

GEM 231, a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide targeted against the RIalpha subunit of protein kinase A (PKA) was co-administered with the chemotherapeutic agent irinotecan, a topoisomerase-I inhibitor, to study the antitumor efficacy of the combination in nude mice bearing various human tumor xenografts. The combination treatment of GEM 231 and irinotecan produced enhanced and prolonged tumor-growth inhibition, compared with irinotecan monotherapy, against human colon (HCT-116), pancreas (Panc-1), prostate (PC3) and lung (SKMES) tumors in mice. The extent of tumor-growth inhibition, however, varied among the different tumor models studied. The tumor-growth inhibition depended on the dose of GEM 231 co-administered with irinotecan. The combination of GEM 231 (20 mg/kg, i.p., 5 days on 2 days off x 7) and irinotecan (50 mg/kg, i.v., qwk x 3) produced significantly longer tumor-growth delay than did irinotecan administered alone. Importantly, the co-administration of irinotecan and GEM 231 did not result in higher toxicity compared with monotherapies in the several tumor models tested. These results suggest that the use of irinotecan in combination with GEM 231 may increase the therapeutic index of irinotecan in cancer patients.