ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate muscle activity and intermuscular coherence of the rectus femoris (RF) and biceps femoris (BF) during forward (FW) and backward (BW) pedaling. Sixteen healthy volunteers performed FW and BW pedaling in 30, 45, and 60 revolutions per minute (RPM), while electromyographic (EMG) signals of the RF and BF were recorded bilaterally to determine integral EMG and intermuscular coherence. BW pedaling showed a statistically significant larger EMG activity on the left BF (P = 0.023) in 30 RPM; on the left BF (P = 0.01), right BF (P = 0.05), and right RF (P = 0.006) in 45 RPM, and on the left BF (P = 0.014) and right RF (P = 0.011) in 60 RPM than FW pedaling. In 45 RPM, higher coherence was demonstrated on the left leg (P = 0.011) during the left flexor and right extensor phases and on the right leg (P = 0.043) during the right flexor and left extensor phases in BW compared with FW pedaling. In 60 RPM, higher coherence was observed on both legs (left, P = 0.037; right, P < 0.001) during the left flexor and right extensor phases in BW compared with FW pedaling. Our results suggest that BW pedaling increased the muscle activity of both biarticular muscles and intermuscular coherence.
Subject(s)
Muscle, Skeletal , Electromyography , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effects of Kinesio taping and therapeutic exercise on correcting forward head posture. OBJECTIVE: To compare Kinesio taping versus therapeutic exercise for forward head posture on static posture, dynamic mobility and functional outcomes. METHODS: Sixty subjects (31 women, 29 men) with forward head postures participated in this study. They were randomly assigned to either one of the three groups: (1) exercise group (n = 20), (2) taping group (n = 20), and (3) control groups (n = 20). The horizontal forward displacement (HFD) between ear lobe and acromion process, upper cervical and lower cervical angle (UCA, LCA), active range of motion (AROM) of cervical spine, and neck disability index (NDI) were measured before and after a 5-week intervention, and a 2-week follow-up. Data were analyzed by means of a mixed design repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Both taping and exercise groups showed significant improvements in HFD compared with the control group at post-treatment and follow-up. Compared with the control group, the exercise group exhibited significant improvements in the LCA and the side bending AROM at post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both Kinesio taping and therapeutic exercise improve forward head posture after intervention and a 2-week follow-up. The effectiveness of therapeutic exercise is better than taping.
Subject(s)
Athletic Tape , Cervical Vertebrae/physiology , Exercise Therapy , Posture , Adult , Exercise , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Day Center, Case Management, and Home Care components of a local senior health agency each have used different screening forms for assessing their clients for fall risk. A common instrument, easily administered by all components as part of their routine practice, would be helpful in systematically identifying elders at risk of falling. Developing a common screening instrument would be useful at other senior health agencies as well. PURPOSE: To gather information on the content and features that are most useful for fall screening, based on the needs of individual geriatric care workers in each component of a local senior health agency. METHODS: A semistructured interview was used to gather feedback from geriatric care workers on what was needed for universal fall risk screening. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged: (1) factors that are relevant in assessing fall risk and (2) factors that affect the utility of the fall risk screening procedure. Under theme 1, there were 6 categories: fall history, physical function, impairments, medications, mental and psychological status, and home environment. Under theme 2, there were 3 categories: methods of gathering information for fall risk assessment, features useful to a fall risk assessment form, and actions taken in response to fall risk assessment. The 6 fall risk categories identified in the interviews were combined with 2 other categories identified in the literature, health status and fear of falling, to produce a universal form for use by different agency components. DISCUSSION: Integrating all fall-risk categories into a universal form improves the completeness of the form used in different agency components. However, to increase the utility of fall risk screening, service plans integrated with each screening procedure need to be developed according to specific agency structures. A 3-step procedure is proposed to improve the effectiveness of fall-risk screening: (1) initial screening with an outreach worker using a quick question assessment; (2) follow-up with a more comprehensive fall risk assessment while receiving services from the Day Center, Case Management, or Home Care; and (3) a "what-to-do" action is presented for each item on the basis of each question's response on the comprehensive form. CONCLUSIONS: When designing a fall risk screening procedure, integrating all fall-risk factors into a single comprehensive form may not be the ideal strategy. The environment, the person who gathers the information, and the actions required to respond to information gathered should also be considered. On the basis of the results of this qualitative study, we have presented a 3-step procedure, with supporting forms to address these considerations.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Therapy Modalities , Qualitative Research , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine exercise efficacy in improving dynamic balance in community-dwelling elderly with a fall history. METHODS: Thirty-five participants were randomly assigned to a treatment (TG; n = 19, 77 ± 7 yr) or control group (CG; n = 16, 75 ± 8 yr). The TG received an individualized home exercise program, and the CG received phone calls twice per week for 12 weeks. Participants' dynamic-balance abilities- directional control (DC), endpoint excursion (EE), maximum excursion (ME), reaction time (RT), and movement velocity (MV)-were measured using the Balance Master at 75% limits of stability. Functional reach (FR) was also measured. RESULTS: At 12 weeks the TG demonstrated significant improvements in DC (p < .0025), EE (p < .0005), and ME (p < .0005), but the CG did not. No significant group differences were found for MV, RT, or FR. CONCLUSIONS: Excursion distances and directional control improved but not reaction time, suggesting that exercises requiring quick responses may be needed.