Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908936

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systemic levels of bupivacaine after bilateral ultrasound-guided deep parasternal intercostal plan (PIP) block in cardiac surgical patients undergoing median sternotomy. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study SETTING: Single institution; academic university hospital PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy received a PIP block with 2.5 mg/kg bupivacaine with or without dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial blood samples were analyzed for total serum bupivacaine concentration at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after placement of PIP. Local anesthetic volume, local anesthetic adjuncts, time to extubation, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: The mean peak bupivacaine concentration was 0.60 ± 0.62 µg/mL, and the mean time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 16.92 ± 12.97 minutes. Two patients (7.1%) had a concentration >2.0 µg/mL within 15 minutes of block placement. The mean Tmax of bupivacaine was significantly greater in patients who did not receive additives compared to those patients who did (22.86 ± 14.77 minutes v 10.0 ± 5.22 minutes; p = .004). The times to extubation and postoperative pain were not improved with additives. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral PIP placed at the end of cardiac surgery resulted in low systemic bupivacaine levels. The inclusion of additives shortened Tmax without improving outcome.

2.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(5): 1115-1126, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461034

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Systemic systolic (SAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressure monitoring is the cornerstone in hemodynamic management of the cardiac surgical patient, and the radial artery is the most common site of catheter placement. The present study compared 3 different arterial line procedures. It is hypothesized that a 20-G 12.7- cm catheter inserted into the radial artery will be equal to a 20-G 12.7- cm angiocath placed in the brachial artery, and superior to a 20-G 5.00 cm angiocath placed in the radial artery. DESIGN: A prospective randomized control study was performed. SETTING: Single academic university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients ≥18 years old undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). INTERVENTIONS: After approval by the Rhode Island Hospital institutional review board, a randomized prospective control study to evaluate 3 different peripheral intraarterial catheter systems was performed: (1) Radial Short (RS): 20-G 5- cm catheter; (2) Radial Long (RL): 20-G 12- cm catheter; and (3) Brachial Long (BL): 20-G 12- cm catheter. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Gradients between central aortic and peripheral catheters (CA-P) were compared and analyzed before CPB and 2 and 10 minutes after separation from CPB. The placement of femoral arterial lines and administration of vasoactive medications were recorded. After exclusions, 67 BL, 61 RL, and 66 RS patients were compared. Before CPB, CA-P SAP and MAP gradients were not significant among the 3 groups. Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient was significant for the RS group (p = 0.005) and insignificant for BL (p = 0.47) and RL (p = 0.39). Two-group analysis revealed that CA-P SAP gradients are similar between BL and RL (p = 0.84), both of which were superior to RS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). At 10 minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient for RS remained significant (p = 0.004) and similar to the gradient at 2 minutes. The CA-P SAP gradients increased from 2 to 10 minutes for BL (p = 0.13) and RL (p = 0.06). Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients were significant for the BL (p = 0.003), RL (p < 0.0001), and RS (p < 0.0001) groups. Two-group analysis revealed that the CA-P MAP gradients were lower for the BL group compared with the RL (p = 0.054) and RS (p< 0.05) groups. Ten minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients in the RL and RS groups remained significant (p < 0.0001) and both greater than the BL group (p = 0.002). A femoral arterial line was placed more frequently in the RS group (8/66 = 12.1%) than in the RL group (3/61 = 4.9%) and the BL group (2/67 = 3.0%). Vasopressin was administered significantly more frequently in the RS group. CONCLUSION: Regarding CA-P SAP gradients, the RL group performed equally to the BL group, both being superior to RS. Regarding CA-P MAP gradients, BL was superior to RL and RS. Clinically, femoral line placement and vasopressin administration were fewer for the BL and RL groups when compared with the RS group. This study demonstrated the benefits of a long (12.7 cm) 20- G angiocath placed in the radial artery.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Hemodynamic Monitoring , Vascular Access Devices , Adult , Humans , Blood Pressure , Cannula , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Prospective Studies , Radial Artery/surgery , Vasopressins , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over
7.
J Heart Valve Dis ; 21(6): 696-701, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23409347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Intraoperative real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT-3D TEE) was used to examine the geometric changes that occur in the mitral annulus immediately after aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: A total of 35 patients undergoing elective surgical AVR under cardiopulmonary bypass was enrolled in the study. Intraoperative RT-3D TEE was used prospectively to acquire volumetric echocardiographic datasets immediately before and after AVR. The 3D echocardiographic data were analyzed offline using TomTec Mitral Valve Assessment software to assess changes in specific mitral annular geometric parameters. RESULTS: Datasets were successfully acquired and analyzed for all patients. A significant reduction was noted in the mitral annular area (-16.3%, p < 0.001), circumference (-8.9%, p < 0.001) and the anteroposterior (-6.3%, p = 0.019) and anterolateral-posteromedial (-10.5%, p < 0.001) diameters. A greater reduction was noted in the anterior annulus length compared to the posterior annulus length (10.5% versus 6.2%, p < 0.05) after AVR. No significant change was seen in the non-planarity angle, coaptation depth, and closure line length. During the period of data acquisition before and after AVR, no significant change was noted in the central venous pressure or left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. CONCLUSION: The mitral annulus undergoes significant geometric changes immediately after AVR. Notably, a 16.3% reduction was observed in the mitral annular area. The anterior annulus underwent a greater reduction in length compared to the posterior annulus, which suggested the existence of a mechanical compression by the prosthetic valve.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Treatment Outcome
8.
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 14(4): 256-73, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21059610

ABSTRACT

Whereas the development of coronary stents has been a major breakthrough in the treatment of coronary artery disease, stent thrombosis, associated with myocardial infarction and death, has introduced a new challenge in the care of patients with coronary stents undergoing noncardiac surgery. This review presents the authors' recommendations regarding the optimal management of such patients. Elective surgery should be postponed for at least 6 weeks and optimally 3 months for a bare-metal stent and at least 1 year for a drug-eluting stent. On the other hand, managing a patient undergoing non-elective surgery is more difficult and necessitates a case-by-case assessment of bleeding risk versus thrombotic risk based on patient comorbidities, type of stents present, details of the coronary intervention, and type of surgical procedure. Patients with a risk of bleeding that outweighs the risk of stent thrombosis should discontinue at least clopidogrel, whereas all other patients should continue dual antiplatelet therapy throughout the perioperative period.


Subject(s)
Drug-Eluting Stents , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Stents , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stents/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...