ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To investigate the comparative effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and sublobar resection (SLR) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) considered to be high-risk lobectomy patients. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2015, patients who underwent SBRT or SLR for clinical stage I NSCLC were examined retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce selection bias in SBRT and SLR patients. RESULTS: Data from 86 SBRT and 79 SLR patients was collected. Median follow-up periods of the SBRT and SLR groups were 32 and 37 months, respectively. Patients treated with SBRT exhibited significantly higher age, higher likelihood of being male, larger tumor diameter, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and poorer performance status compared with SLR patients. There were no significant differences between SBRT and SLR patients for 3-year overall survival (OS) (80.3% and 82.3%, P=0.405), cause-specific survival (CSS) (81.3% and 83.4%, P=0.383), and local control (LC) (89.7% and 86.0%, P=0.501). Forty-nine patients were identified from each group after performing PSM. After patients were matched for age, gender, performance status, tumor characteristics and pulmonary function, no significant differences were observed in 3-year OS (85.4% and 73.3%, P=0.649), CSS (87.2% and 74.9%, P=0.637) and LC (95.6% and 82.1%, P=0.055). Prevalence of significant adverse events (grade 3 or worse) was 0% and 10.2% in the matched SBRT and SLR groups (P=0.056), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Disease control and survival in the SBRT patients was equivalent to that seen in SLR patients with stage I NSCLC considered high-risk lobectomy candidates. SBRT could therefore be an alternative option to SLR in treating patients with a high operative risk.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: and purpose: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the feasibility of shrinking field radiotherapy during chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with stage III NSCLC who achieved a good response to chemoradiation were analyzed. Computed tomography was performed after 40-50 Gy dose radiation to evaluate curative effect. Patients in the shrinking field group underwent resimulation CT scans and shrinking field radiotherapy. Acute symptomatic irradiation-induced pneumonia (ASIP), progression patterns and survival were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 97 patients who achieved response after a median total dose of 60 Gy, fifty patients received shrinking field radiotherapy. The incidence of acute symptomatic irradiation-induced pneumonia tended to be lower for the shrinking field group (18.0% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.51). The rate of disease progression was significantly higher in the non-shrinking than shrinking field group (95.7% vs. 66.0%, P < 0.001). Compared to the non-shrinking field group, the shrinking field group had similar overall survival (30.0 vs. 30.0 months, P = 0.58) but significantly better median progression-free survival (14.0 vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Shrinking field radiotherapy during chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer seems safe with acceptable toxicities and relapse, and potentially spares normal tissues and enables dose escalation. Prospective trials are warranted.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cancer patients were generally excluded from the therapeutic guidelines of antiviral therapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection concomitant with malignancy other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Twenty-five HCV patients with curative malignancy other than HCC (group A) and 75 sex- and age-matched controls (group B) were recruited into a prospective and case-control analysis. All patients received peginterferon-alpha-2a (PegIFN-alpha-2a) and weight-based ribavirin according to the current treatment recommendations. The primary outcome measurement was sustained virological response (SVR). The safety issue between groups was also compared. RESULTS: There were 22 (88.0 %) patients of group A and 59 (78.7 %) patients of group B who achieved an SVR (p = 0.39). The SVR rate was comparable between groups both in genotype-1 (HCV-1) (81.8 vs. 72.7 %, p = 0.70) and in genotype-2 (HCV-2) (92.9 vs. 83.3 %, p = 0.66) patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the achievement of a RVR (viral clearance during first 4 weeks of treatment) was the strongest predictor of an SVR (odds ratio/95 % confidence intervals [OR/CI]: 6.357/1.50 - 26.99, p = 0.01), followed by lower baseline viral loads (OR/CI: 0.403/0.174 - 0.936, p = 0.034) and higher dose of ribavirin exposure (OR/CI: 1.287/1.092 - 1.517, p = 0.003), whilst previous occurrence of cancer was not associated with SVR. Treatment adherence (76.0 vs. 72.0 %, p = 0.70) and the incidences of grade 3 or more adverse events (28.0 vs. 20.0 %, p = 0.40) were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic hepatitis C patients with non-HCC malignancies receiving peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy carried favorable efficacy and safety outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is a surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease risks and related mortality. However, the features of hs-CRP in chronic HCV infection (CHC) patients have not been fully addressed. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of hs-CRP and its correlation with clinical profiles in CHC patients. METHODS: Ninety-five CHC patients and 95 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled for serum hs-CRP level, biochemical, and metabolic profiles examinations. Sequential changes of hs-CRP levels in CHC patients receiving peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean hs-CRP level of CHC patients was significantly higher than that of healthy controls (0.97 ± 0.11 vs. 0.24 ± 0.07 mg/L, P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between hs-CRP and both virological and histological factors. CHC patients with a high LDL-C level had significantly higher mean hs-CRP (1.38 ± 0.20 mg/L) than that of patients without (0.59 ± 0.06 mg/L) (P < 0.001). Hs-CRP level was significantly decreased in 83 patients after peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy (0.24 vs. 0.62 mg/L, P < 0.001), particularly in 68 patients achieving a sustained virological response (0.25 vs. 0.64 mg/L, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CHC patients had a higher hs-CRP level than healthy controls which could be ameliorated after peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy.
