ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Because benzodiazepines (BZDs) may be abused, prescribing them is debatable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prescription of BZDs to explore the current status of BZD use at discharge and at 4 months after discharge. METHODS: From 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006, prescribed doses for BZDs at discharge and at 4 months after discharge were recorded for all discharged inpatients with schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, and major depressive disorder. Twoway analysis of variance was used to analyze the effects of severe mental illness and cooccurring alcohol abuse/dependence on BZD doses at discharge and at 4 months after discharge. RESULTS: Patients with severe mental illness prescribed with significantly higher rates and higher doses of BZDs at discharge and at 4 months after discharge are more likely to have major depressive disorder and to have cooccurring alcohol abuse/dependence problems. No significant interactions were found between severe mental illness and cooccurring alcohol abuse/dependence. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that caution should be applied in prescribing BZDs to patients with severe mental illness, particularly those with major depressive disorder and cooccurring alcohol abuse/dependence. Future studies require being conducted in many different mental healthcare systems in Taiwan to generalize the findings.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism/drug therapy , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Alcoholism/psychology , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/etiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Taiwan/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Monotherapy is recommended for schizophrenia treatment, but the risk-benefit issue of antipsychotic drug combination (except for clozapine) remains unclear. Risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic drug, has a lower incidence of extrapyramidal syndrome but higher risks of prolactinemia and metabolic syndrome than haloperidol, a typical agent. This study compared efficacy and safety of risperidone monotherapy versus low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol in schizophrenia. In this 6-week, double-blind study, patients were randomized to the combination group (2-mg/d risperidone plus 2-mg/d haloperidol, n = 46) or the monotherapy group (4-mg/d risperidone, n = 42). Efficacy assessments included Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and subscales, Calgary Depression Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36. Safety was rigorously monitored. Response was defined as 30% reduction in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. The 2 treatment groups were similar in (1) demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline, (2) response rate, and (3) improvement in various psychopathological measures and quality of life at end point. The monotherapy group had a higher increase in prolactin levels (P = 0.04) and Simpson-Angus Scale scores (P = 0.04) and a higher percentage of biperiden use (P = 0.045). There were no significant between-group difference in changes in weight, vital signs, corrected QT interval, liver/renal function, fasting glucose level, and lipid profiles. The findings suggest that risperidone monotherapy may yield higher prolactin levels than a combination of low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol. The 2 treatment groups are similar in efficacy, life quality, and other safety profiles. Future long-term studies are warranted.