Treatment of bone metastases before the onset of pain.

PURPOSE: Bone metastases are often asymptomatic and are not diagnosed until after the onset of bone pain. However, bone structural integrity may have diminished considerably before pain onset, resulting in increased risk of skeletal-related events. Therefore, we evaluated whether bisphosphonate therapy was differentially beneficial depending on initiation before or after the onset of bone pain. METHODS: Exploratory analyses were performed in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer or lung cancer/other solid tumors enrolled in two randomized trials comparing monthly zoledronic acid versus pamidronate (breast cancer) or placebo (lung cancer/other solid tumors). Analyses included proportion of patients with one or more skeletal-related events, time to first skeletal-related event, and skeletal morbidity rate in patients with and without baseline pain. RESULTS: Approximately 80 % of patients reported baseline pain. Similar to overall trial results, zoledronic acid reduced the skeletal morbidity rate in all groups. Although some subsets lacked statistical power, benefits were generally greater in patients without baseline pain. For example, in breast cancer, zoledronic acid increased the 25th quartile of time to first skeletal-related event versus pamidronate by 522 days in patients with no baseline pain (median not reached for either group), but by only 10 days in patients with baseline pain. Similar trends were observed in lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Benefits from zoledronic acid appeared to be greater if introduced before bone pain onset. Early diagnosis and treatment of bone metastases may delay onset of skeletal-related events.

Disease progression increases the risk of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer, lung cancer, or other solid tumors.

Baseline and disease progression characteristics may predict the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases from various solid tumors. Exploratory analysis of phase III trials compared zoledronic acid with placebo in patients with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer (N = 643) and lung cancer or other solid tumors (N = 773), adjusted for baseline and time-dependent disease parameters. In all models, more than three bone lesions at baseline correlated with the increased SRE risk. Bone and overall disease progression correlated with increased SRE risk. Overall, cancer progression correlated with increased SRE risks and zoledronic acid was associated with reduced SRE risks versus placebo.

Continuing benefit of zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases.

PURPOSE: We previously reported the efficacy of zoledronic acid 4 mg versus placebo (every 3 weeks for 24 months) for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in men with advanced prostate cancer and bone metastases. We conducted several retrospective exploratory analyses to determine whether zoledronic acid has continuing efficacy during long-term treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This report included analysis of the occurrence of SREs during the extension phase only (months 16-24), analysis of skeletal complications excluding the first SRE at 15 months (core phase), and stratified analysis of patients by history of SREs before study entry. RESULTS: Patients (N=422) were randomized to receive zoledronic acid 4 mg or placebo. For the 132 patients who entered the extension phase, zoledronic acid significantly delayed the onset of first SRE (P=.009) and decreased the risk of developing an SRE by 53% compared with placebo (P=.022). Among all 422 patients, zoledronic acid significantly reduced the incidence of a second on-study SRE (P=.017) and significantly delayed the median time to second SRE compared with placebo (P=.006) at 15 months. Among 144 patients (34%) with a history of SREs before study entry, zoledronic acid significantly reduced the skeletal morbidity rate by 65% (P=.036) and reduced the overall risk of developing an SRE by 40% (P=.028) compared with placebo at 24 months. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms our previously reported results and suggests that long-term treatment with zoledronic acid provides continuing clinical benefit in patients with advanced prostate cancer, even after the occurrence of SREs.

Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease.

BACKGROUND: Data from randomized, controlled trials of zoledronic acid were retrospectively analyzed to assess the effect of pathologic fractures on survival in patients with malignant bone disease. METHODS: A Cox regression model was used to estimate the effect of fractures (time-dependent variable) on survival in patients with stage III multiple myeloma or bone metastases from solid tumors enrolled in 3 large trials. Patients were randomized to receive zoledronic acid, pamidronate, or placebo every 3-4 weeks for up to 24 months (prostate cancer, breast cancer, and multiple myeloma) or up to 21 months (lung and other solid tumors). RESULTS: A total of 3049 patients with multiple myeloma (n = 513), breast (n = 1130), prostate (n = 640), or lung cancer or other solid tumors (n = 766) were included in this analysis. Patients with multiple myeloma had the highest fracture incidence (43%), followed by breast (35%), prostate (19%), and lung cancer (17%). In all tumor types except lung, pathologic fracture was associated with a significant increase in risk of death, and breast cancer patients had the greatest increased risk. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, including performance status and prior skeletal complications, breast cancer patients who developed a pathologic fracture on study had a significant 32% increased risk of death relative to patients without a fracture (hazard ratio = 1.32; P < .01); patients with multiple myeloma or prostate cancer had a >20% increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that fractures are associated with increased risk of death in patients with malignant bone disease. Therefore, preventing fractures is an important goal of therapy.

Capecitabine plus paclitaxel as front-line combination therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this multicenter, open-label phase II study was the clinical evaluation of combination therapy with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine and the taxane paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with MBC received oral capecitabine at 1650 mg/m(2)/d (825 mg/m(2) twice daily) on days 1 through 14, and intravenous infusion of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient' s decision to discontinue. Patients (35 to 76 years old) had a median Karnofsky performance status of 90%. Forty-four patients (94%) received study treatment as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. RESULTS: Objective responses occurred in 24 (51%) patients; seven (15%) complete responses and 17 (36%) partial responses. Stable disease lasting 180 days or more was observed in nine (19%); the clinical response rate was 70%. Median duration of response was 12.6 months, median time to disease progression was 10.6 months, and median overall survival time was 29.9 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events, regardless of severity, were alopecia, hand-foot syndrome, nausea, and fatigue. Neutropenia (15%), alopecia (13%), and hand-foot syndrome (11%) were the only grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events that occurred in more than 10% of patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine plus paclitaxel is a highly active and generally well-tolerated regimen for first-line treatment of MBC.

Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda; Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ) in patients with metastatic or unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients were treated with oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) administered twice daily (2,500 mg/m(2)/d) as intermittent therapy in 3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment. Tumor lesions were assessed by computed tomography scan or physical examination at 6-week intervals (after every two cycles). Adverse events were monitored continuously during treatment and for 28 days after the last dose of study drug. RESULTS: Ten (24%) of 42 patients experienced a clinical benefit response (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1% to 39.5%) as evidenced by improvement in pain intensity, analgesic consumption, and/or Karnofsky performance status. Three (7.3%) of the 41 patients with measurable disease had an objective response (partial). The median time to objective response was 85 days (range, 47 to 91 days) and duration of response was 208, 260, and 566 days for the three responding patients. One patient with nonmeasurable but assessable disease had improved residual disease with a positive clinical benefit response, for a total of four responses among the 42 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 9.5% (90% CI, 3.3% to 20.5%). Capecitabine was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment with capecitabine resulted in clinically significant beneficial effects on tumor-related symptoms and yielded objective response activity in patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. These results together with its generally tolerable safety profile and the added advantage of oral administration provide the basis for further evaluating capecitabine as a single agent or in combination with other treatment modalities in this patient population.