Can puncture increase the risk of intra-articular adhesion in the temporomandibular joint?

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the incidence and severity of intra-articular adhesion under arthroscopy between patients with and without a history of joint puncture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with internal derangements of TMJ who underwent arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing surgery from February 2008 to September 2008 were included in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether the patient had undergone joint puncture before surgery or not. The diagnosis of intra-articular adhesion was made according to the manifestation under arthroscopy. Incidence and severity of intra-articular adhesion between these 2 groups was compared. RESULTS: The incidence of intra-articular adhesion in the patients with a history of puncture was 69.23%, which was higher than that in the patients without a history of puncture (24.36%). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of severe adhesions in patients with a history of joint puncture was also higher than that in patients without a history of puncture (26.09% vs. 2.56%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Puncture may increase the risk of intra-articular adhesion in patients with internal derangement.

Arthroscopic management for synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint: a retrospective review of 33 cases.

PURPOSE: To present clinical, radiologic, and arthroscopic results of patients with synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint; to introduce a technique for removal of loose bodies in different areas; and to summarize the indications of therapeutic arthroscopy according to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2001 to April 2010, 33 consecutive patients underwent arthroscopy. Their demographics, clinical manifestations, imaging studies, arthroscopic findings, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The predominant symptoms were pain, limitation of mouth opening, and joint sounds. Obvious joint effusion was shown on MRI in 21 of 33 patients. Mass lesions were shown on MRI in 29 of 33 cases. The presence of loose bodies was shown in 31 cases under an arthroscope. Synovial hyperplasia was noted in 12 patients. Bony erosion of the articular surface was discovered in 11 patients. Thirty-two patients underwent therapeutic arthroscopy. Smaller loose bodies were commonly removed with joint lavage or biopsy forceps in 24 patients. Fragmentation with forceps or a wider additional incision was applied to remove larger loose bodies in 7 patients. Debridement was applied to remove intrasynovial lesions in 7 patients. Coblation was used to remove the hyperplastic synovium in 10 of 32 patients. Eight patients were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 38 months. No recurrence was suspected clinically and radiologically. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic arthroscopy was appropriate for patients with separate mass lesions and no extra-articular extension. Surgical treatment comprised thorough removal of loose bodies and affected synovial tissues.

New arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing technique for treating internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: part II--magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficiency of an arthroscopic suturing technique for stabilizing anteriorly displaced discs in patients with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred thirty-nine patients (764 joints) diagnosed as having stages II to V of internal derangement were treated with arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing from August 2004 to March 2007. Consecutive MR images were used to evaluate internal derangement before and approximately 1 to 7 days after the operation for all 639 patients. The disc position of the TMJ was judged according to the success criteria, which included 3 different sagittal planes (lateral, central, and medial). Operative efficiency in those patients, whose discs of the TMJ were affirmed to be in a normal position in all 3 planes, was evaluated to be excellent. Those patients whose discs were in a normal position in 2 planes were evaluated to be good. The others were evaluated to be poor. Cases evaluated as excellent and good were considered success cases (if the disc is displaced only in 1 or 2 planes before operation, the efficiency of the operation would be evaluated as a success only if the whole disc was in normal position). RESULTS: Postoperative consecutive MR images for all 764 joints confirmed that 95.42% (729/764) of the joints were excellent, 3.14% (24/764) were good, and only 1.44% (11/764) were poor. Repeated arthroscopic surgery or open surgery was carried out for the joints that were evaluated as poor. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the TMJ arthroscopic suturing technique is effective in repositioning the TMJ disc as confirmed by an MR imaging examination, but long-term follow-up is necessary.