Adjunctive cariprazine for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Converging evidence has suggested that treatment augmentation with a second-generation atypical antipsychotic (SGA) may improve treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients after an incomplete response to a first-line antidepressant. Cariprazine is a recently approved SGA for MDD augmentation. Herein, we evaluate both continuous (ie, change in depressive symptom severity scores over time) and categorical (ie, remission and response rates) outcomes. Following a full-text review, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis, while five studies were included for a qualitative review. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for all included randomized controlled studies to determine the relative response and remission rates of cariprazine compared to placebo augmentation. The RR for all-cause dropout was also determined as a proxy for overall acceptability. Two studies found a statistically significant treatment response using cariprazine augmentation. One study observed depressive symptom remission for cariprazine compared to placebo. Our random-effects model revealed moderate antidepressant effects of cariprazine, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of -1.79 (95% CI): -2.89, -0.69). Our pooled response RR and remission RR were calculated as 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.39, P=0.008) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.17, P=0.91), respectively. The RR for response was statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the RR for remission was not statistically significant. The findings from our meta-analysis include a variable magnitude of effects. Evidence suggests cariprazine may be an effective treatment for MDD; however, further results are needed to clarify this relation.

Psilocybin-assisted therapy for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this review was to determine the effect of psilocybin on depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with life-threatening illnesses or major depressive disorder. Systematic searches were conducted to search for randomized clinical trials and open-label trials that evaluated depression symptoms after psilocybin therapy. Data was pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the standardized mean difference (SMD) in depression severity, determined by calculating the change in depression ratings from baseline to the primary endpoint in the psilocybin arm versus the control arm. The literature search yielded 1734 studies, and 13 studies (n = 686) were included in either qualitative and/or quantitative analyses. The meta-analysis included 9 studies (pooled n = 596) and yielded a large effect size in favour of psilocybin (SMD = -0.78; p<0.001). Risk ratios for response and remission were large and significant in favour of psilocybin. A review of open-label trials showed robust decreases in depressive symptoms following psilocybin administration. These findings provide preliminary evidence for antidepressant efficacy with psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy, however, further studies are needed to evaluate safety and efficacy and to optimize treatment protocols.

Ketamine for bipolar depression: an updated systematic review.

Background: The therapeutic potential of subanesthetic doses of ketamine appears promising in unipolar depression; however, its effectiveness in treating bipolar depression (BD) remains uncertain. Objective: This systematic review aimed to summarize findings on the use of ketamine for the treatment of BD by assessing its efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Design: Systematic review. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies that investigated the use of ketamine for adults with BD. We searched PubMed and Embase for relevant randomized-controlled trials, open-label trials, and retrospective chart analyses published from inception to 13 March 2023. Results: Eight studies were identified [pooled n = 235; mean (SD) age: 45.55 (5.54)]. All participants who received intravenous (IV) ketamine were administered a dose of 0.5-0.75 mg/kg as an adjunctive treatment to a mood-stabilizing agent, whereas participants who received esketamine were administered a dosage ranging from 28 to 84 mg. Flexible dosing was used in real-world analyses. A total of 48% of participants receiving ketamine achieved a response (defined as ⩾50% reduction in baseline depression severity), whereas only 5% achieved a response with a placebo. Real-world studies demonstrated lower rates of response (30%) compared to the average across clinical trials (63%). Reductions in suicidal ideation were noted in some studies, although not all findings were statistically significant. Ketamine and esketamine were well tolerated in most participants; however, six participants (2% of the overall sample pool, 5 receiving ketamine) developed hypomanic/manic symptoms after infusions. Significant dissociative symptoms were observed at the 40-min mark in some trials. Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests IV ketamine as being safe and effective for the treatment of BD. Future studies should focus on investigating the effects of repeated acute and maintenance infusions using a randomized study design.

Lumateperone for the Treatment of Adults With Schizophrenia: a Systematic Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lumateperone (LUM) is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved atypical antipsychotic agent for adults with schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar depression (for both bipolar I and bipolar II disorder as as monotherapy or as adjunctive treatment to lithium or valproate). LUM simultaneously modulates serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission. The foregoing pleiotropic mechanism of action is predictive of therapeutic benefits across multiple domains of psychopathology in SCZ (i.e., positive, negative, cognitive, and prosocial symptoms). Herein, the overarching aim is to synthesize the extant literature reporting on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LUM in adults with SCZ. RECENT FINDINGS: Four clinical studies (i.e., three RCTs and one open-label trial) were included in this synthesis. Overall, LUM significantly reduced the severity of SCZ compared with placebo. The open label study provided the real-world effectiveness of shifting stable patients with SCZ to LUM from other atypical antipsychotics. With respect to safety and tolerability profile, LUM demonstrated placebo-level rates of weight gain, metabolic shift, prolactin elevation, extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), and akathisia across short term trials (i.e., 4-6 weeks). Taken together, our results indicate that LUM significantly improves symptoms severity in adults with SCZ. LUM also exhibits a favorable tolerability and safety profile with placebo level rates of weight gain, metabolic disruption, akathisia, extrapyramidal side effects (excluding akathisia), and prolactin elevation. Lumateperone should be conceptualized as a first-line treatment strategy for adults with SCZ.

Olanzapine and samidorphan combination treatment: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The overarching aim of this review is to synthesize the efficacy, tolerability, and weight-mitigation effects of the olanzapine/samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) combination treatment in adults with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder-I. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library was conducted on August 15th, 2021. Studies were included if they investigated the use of OLZ/SAM treatment in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder-I, and reported the clinical outcomes: efficacy, change in weight or waist circumference, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, or change in metabolic parameters. A narrative synthesis was undertaken of the data. RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. All identified studies were conducted in adults with schizophrenia. Compared to OLZ-monotherapy, OLZ/SAM was associated with decreased odds of developing clinically significant (>10%) weight gain (OR=0.50, 95% CI:0.31,0.80; p= 0.003) and increase in waist circumference (risk difference = -17.1% 95% CI:-26.3,-7.8) from baseline measurements respectively. In another study, OLZ was 2.7 times more associated with clinically significant weight gain as compared to OLZ/SAM (OR=2.73, 95% CI:1.11, 6.67; p = 0.023). The clinical efficacy of OLZ/SAM remained similar to OLZ with improved tolerability in both short- and long-term studies with no significantly altered pharmacokinetic properties of the constituent agents. CONCLUSION: OLZ/SAM-treatment is associated with mitigated weight-gain liability when compared to OLZ-monotherapy in adults with schizophrenia. Additional studies are needed to ascertain patient acceptability, appropriate selection and sequencing of OLZ/SAM in the treatment algorithms for adults with schizophrenia (and BD-I), as well as to determine cost-effectiveness and long-term metabolic effects.