Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Soc Neurosci ; 11(4): 353-64, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26343527

ABSTRACT

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) subserves complex cognitive abilities, including risky decision-making; the modulation of this brain area is shown to alter the way people take risks. Yet, neuromodulation of the PFC in relation to risk-taking behavior remains relatively less well-studied. Moreover, the psychological variables that influence such neuromodulation remain poorly understood. To address these issues, 16 participants took part in 3 experimental sessions on separate days. They received: (i) left anodal-right cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); (ii) left cathodal-right anodal stimulation; or (iii) sham stimulation while they completed two risk-taking tasks. They also measured on several cognitive-affective abilities and personality traits. It was revealed that left cathodal-right anodal stimulation led to significantly reduced risk-taking under a context of haste. The reduction of risk-taking (relative to sham) correlated with state and trait impulsivity, such that the effect was larger in more impulsive individuals. For these individuals, the tDCS effect size was considered to be large (generalized partial η(2) > .17). The effect of prefrontal-neuromodulation in reducing risk-taking was influenced by baseline impulsivity, reflecting a state-dependent effect of neuromodulation on the PFC. The results of this study carry important insights into the use of neuromodulation to alter higher cognition.


Subject(s)
Decision Making/physiology , Impulsive Behavior/physiology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Risk-Taking , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adolescent , Affect/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Cognition/physiology , Electroencephalography , Female , Functional Laterality , Galvanic Skin Response , Humans , Male , Personality , Young Adult
2.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 25(11): 1968-80, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26364127

ABSTRACT

Neurobiological investigation of heroin revealed that abusers of this highly addictive substance show dysregulation in brain circuits for reward processing and cognitive control. Psychologically, personality traits related to reward processing and cognitive control differed between heroin abusers and non-abusers. Yet, there is no direct evidence on the relationship between these neurobiological and psychological findings on heroin abusers, and whether such relationship is altered in these abusers. The present study filled this research gap by integrating findings obtained via magnetic resonance imaging (structural volume and resting-state functional connectivity) and self-reported personality trait measures (Zuckerman׳s Sensation Seeking Scale and Barratt Impulsivity Scale) on 33 abstinent heroin users and 30 matched healthy controls. The key finding is a negative relationship between high sensation seeking tendency and midbrain structural volume in the heroin users. Importantly, there was stronger coupling between the midbrain and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and weaker coupling between the midbrain and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in heroin users. Our findings offer significant insight into the neural underpinning of sensation seeking in heroin users. Importantly, the data shed light on a novel relationship between the mesolimbic-prefrontal pathway of the reward system and the high sensation seeking personality trait in heroin abusers.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Heroin Dependence/physiopathology , Heroin Dependence/psychology , Personality/physiology , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/pathology , Alcohol Drinking/physiopathology , Brain/pathology , Brain Mapping , Heroin Dependence/pathology , Humans , Impulsive Behavior , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Organ Size , Personality Tests , Rest , Reward , Smoking/pathology , Smoking/physiopathology
3.
Brain Stimul ; 6(2): 160-5, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22572414

ABSTRACT

Numbers can be used to represent different meanings, including order information ('Steve lives at house number 24') and quantity ('Steve is paid 24 pounds'). The few previous neuroimaging studies that investigated order and quantity processing reported conflicting evidence as to whether same or partially overlapping brain systems are engaged in these processes. Such inconsistencies may be related to the use of neuroimaging techniques which do not allow causal inference regarding brain-behaviour relationships. To overcome this problem, the present study employed continuous theta-burst stimulation (TBS) to investigate whether interference to either the left or right parietal regions affected order and quantity in similar or different ways. Results revealed that following TBS to the left intraparietal sulcus, quantity processing was impaired and order facilitated; TBS to the contralateral brain region led to no specific effects in either order or quantity processing. These findings suggest that there are at least partially different neuronal populations involved in order and quantity processing, and that the left parietal cortex is critical for both processes.


Subject(s)
Functional Laterality/physiology , Parietal Lobe/physiology , Problem Solving/physiology , Theta Rhythm/physiology , Adult , Female , Functional Neuroimaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reaction Time/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
4.
Schizophr Res ; 136(1-3): 122-7, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22285654

ABSTRACT

Risky decision-making is subserved by the frontostriatal system, which includes a network of interconnected brain regions known to be dysfunctional in patients with schizophrenia. This study aimed to investigate whether and to what extent patients with schizophrenia display a different pattern of risk-taking behavior relative to matched healthy controls. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and the Risky-Gains Task were used as naturalistic measures of risk-taking behavior in 25 patients with schizophrenia and 25 controls. Results of the BART revealed that patients behaved more conservatively, and this in turn led to suboptimal risky decision-making. Consistently, patients behaved more conservatively in the Risky-Gains Task. Interestingly, however, they adjusted the pattern of risk-taking following a punished trial similar to controls. These findings indicate that patients have impaired reward but preserved punishment processing. This study complements previous studies on decision-making in schizophrenia and suggests specific rather than widespread abnormalities along the frontostriatal system in schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Learning Disabilities/etiology , Punishment , Reward , Risk-Taking , Schizophrenia/complications , Schizophrenic Psychology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Asian People/psychology , Female , Humans , Intelligence Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...