Early pathophysiology-driven airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with moderate-severe ARDS: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional Mechanical ventilation modes used for individuals suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome have the potential to exacerbate lung injury through regional alveolar overinflation and/or repetitive alveolar collapse with shearing, known as atelectrauma. Animal studies have demonstrated that airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) offers distinct advantages over conventional mechanical ventilation modes. However, the methodologies for implementing APRV vary widely, and the findings from clinical studies remain controversial. This study (APRVplus trial), aims to assess the impact of an early pathophysiology-driven APRV ventilation approach compared to a low tidal volume ventilation (LTV) strategy on the prognosis of patients with moderate to severe ARDS. METHODS: The APRVplus trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, building upon our prior single-center study, to enroll 840 patients from at least 35 hospitals in China. This investigation plans to compare the early pathophysiology-driven APRV ventilation approach with the control intervention of LTV lung-protective ventilation. The primary outcome measure will be all-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization in the intensive care units (ICU). Secondary outcome measures will include assessments of oxygenation, and physiology parameters at baseline, as well as on days 1, 2, and 3. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days at 28 days, duration of ICU and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality, and the occurrence of adverse events will be evaluated. TRIAL ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research project has obtained approval from the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2019-337). Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03549910) on June 8, 2018.

Simple aspiration for spontaneous pneumothorax in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is a widespread clinical entity, and methods of managing adult SP remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to further determine the clinical efficacy and safety of simple aspiration (SA) in comparison to intercostal tube drainage (ITD) during the management of adult SP. METHODS: EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Ovid SP were searched (to June 2023) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) that reported outcomes of interest after comparing SA with ITD for the management of adult SP. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 1447 citations, of which 10 RCTs enrolling 1044 subjects were included. Compared with the ITD group, the SA group had a significantly lower the initial success rate of the procedure for the management of SP (OR 0.63, 95% CI [0.47-0.86]; P = 0.004). Moreover, SA was associated with a decreased duration of hospitalization (mean difference-2.05 days, 95% CI [-2.66 - -1.44]; P < 0.001) and a decreased need for operation (P = 0.03). For frequently reported adverse events such as subcutaneous emphysema (P = 0.32), bleeding (P = 0.0.26) and wound infection (P = 0.07), no significant difference between the SA and ITD groups was found. There was no significant difference for other outcomes. Subgroup analysis found that there was no significant difference between SA and ITD in terms of the initial success rate, 1-week success rate or any type of adverse event for PSP patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of adult SP, the use of SA decreased the initial success rate but also decreased the duration of hospitalization and the need for operation compared with ITD. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two approaches. The research plan was registered at PROSPERO, and the registration number was CRD42023436770.

Ferroptosis-related signature and immune infiltration characterization in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) is one of the most life-threatening diseases in the intensive care unit with high mortality and morbidity. Ferroptosis is a newly discovered immune related cell death that is associated with various lung diseases. However, the role of immune-mediated ferroptosis in ALI/ARDS has not been elucidated. METHOD: We analyzed two Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE2411 and GSE109913) and extracted characteristic ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) between the control and ALI groups through bioinformatic analysis. Then, we prospectively collected bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from patients with ARDS and verified the expression of characteristic FRGs. Lastly, we constructed the ALI/ARDS model induced by LPS and isolated the primary neutrophils of mice. Erastin, an ferroptosis inducer, was used at the cellular level to verify the effect of neutrophils on ferroptosis in lung epithelium cells. RESULT: We identified three characteristic FRGs, Cp, Slc39a14 and Slc7a11, by analyzing two gene expression profiling datasets. Immune infiltration analysis showed that the three characteristic genes were significantly positively correlated with the infiltration levels of neutrophils. We collected BALF from 59 ARDS patients to verify the expression of Cp, Slc7a11 and Slc39a14 in humans. The results showed that Cp was elevated in patients with severe ARDS (p = 0.019), Slc7a11 was significantly elevated in patients with moderate ARDS (p = 0.021) relative to patients with mild ARDS. The levels of neutrophils in the peripheral blood of ARDS patients were positively correlated with the expression levels of Slc7a11 (Pearson's R2 = 0.086, p = 0.033). Three characteristic FRGs were significantly activated after the onset of ferroptosis (6 h) early in LPS induced ALI model, and that ferroptosis was alleviated after the organism compensated within 12 to 48 h. We extracted primary activated neutrophils from mice and co-cultured them with MLE-12 in transwell, Slc7a11, Cp and Slc39a14 in MLE-12 cells were significantly upregulated as the number of neutrophils increased. The results showed that neutrophil infiltration alleviated erastin-induced MDA accumulation, GSH depletion, and divalent iron accumulation, accompanied by upregulation of Slc7a11 and Gpx4, implying the existence of a compensatory effect of lipid oxidation in neutrophils after acute lung injury in the organism. CONCLUSION: We identified three immune-mediated ferroptosis genes, namely, Cp, Slc7a11 and Slc39a14, which possibly regulated by neutrophils during the development of ALI, and their pathways may be involved in anti-oxidative stress and anti-lipid metabolism. Thus, the present study contributes to the understanding of ALI/ARDS and provide novel targets for future immunotherapeutic.

Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients.

Background: To characterize the population of critically ill patients and infections treated with linezolid in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid therapy. Methods: This multi-center, observational, real-world study was conducted across 52 hospitals between June 9, 2018, and December 28, 2019. Patients who met the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) admitted to the ICU, (2) of any age group, and (3) having a clinical or laboratory diagnosis of a Gram-positive bacterial infection. Clinical efficacy was categorized as success (cured or improved), failed, or non-evaluable. Adverse events and serious adverse events were recorded during treatment. Results: A total of 366 ICU patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Linezolid was used as second- and first-line treatment in 232 (63.4%) and 134 (36.6%) patients, respectively. The most common isolated strain was Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: n=37/119, 31.1%; methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: n=15/119, 12.6%); this was followed by Enterococci (vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: n=8/119, 6.7%; vancomycin-susceptible Enterococci: n=11/119, 9.2%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (multidrug-resistant: n=4/119, 3.4%; non-multidrug resistant: n=2/119, 1.7%). The main infection sites where pathogens were detected included the lung (n=216/366, 59.6%), skin and soft tissue (n=104/366, 28.4%), and blood (n=50/366, 13.7%). Clinical success was achieved in 301 (82.2%) patients; 34 (9.3%) were cured and 267 (73.0%) improved; treatment failure and non-evaluable outcomes were observed in 29 (7.9%) in 36 (9.8%) patients, respectively. Linezolid-related adverse events were reported in 8 (2.2%) patients. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Based on real-world results, linezolid was found to be effective and safe in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections in critically ill patients.

Effects of airway pressure release ventilation on multi-organ injuries in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome pig models.

BACKGROUND: Extra-pulmonary multi-organ failure in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major cause of high mortality. Our purpose is to assess whether airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) causes more multi-organ damage than low tidal volume ventilation (LTV). METHODS: Twenty one pigs were randomized into control group (n = 3), ARDS group (n = 3), LTV group (n = 8) and APRV group (n = 7). Severe ARDS model was induced by repeated bronchial saline lavages. Pigs were ventilated and monitored continuously for 48 h. Respiratory data, hemodynamic data, serum inflammatory cytokines were collected throughout the study. Histological injury and apoptosis were assessed by two pathologists. RESULTS: After severe ARDS modeling, pigs in ARDS, LTV and APRV groups experienced significant hypoxemia and reduced lung static compliance (Cstat). Oxygenation recovered progressively after 16 h mechanical ventilation (MV) in LTV and APRV group. The results of the repeated measures ANOVA showed no statistical difference in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio between the APRV and LTV groups (p = 0.54). The Cstat showed a considerable improvement in APRV group with statistical significance (p < 0.01), which was significantly higher than in the LTV group since 16 h (p = 0.04). Histological injury scores showed a significantly lower injury score in the middle and lower lobes of the right lung in the APRV group compared to LTV (pmiddle = 0.04, plower = 0.01), and no significant increase in injury scores for extra-pulmonary organs, including kidney (p = 0.10), small intestine (p = 1.0), liver (p = 0.14, p = 0.13) and heart (p = 0.20). There were no significant differences in serum inflammatory cytokines between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in the experimental pig models of severe ARDS induced by repetitive saline lavage, APRV improved lung compliance with reduced lung injury of middle and lower lobes, and did not demonstrate more extra-pulmonary organ injuries as compared with LTV.

The Effects of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation on Pulmonary Permeability in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Pig Models.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of APRV and LTV ventilation on pulmonary permeability in severe ARDS. Methods: Mini Bama adult pigs were randomized into the APRV group (n = 5) and LTV group (n = 5). A severe ARDS animal model was induced by the whole lung saline lavage. Pigs were ventilated and monitored continuously for 48 h. Results: Compared with the LTV group, CStat was significantly better (p < 0.05), and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio showed a trend to be higher throughout the period of the experiment in the APRV group. The extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular permeability index showed a trend to be lower in the APRV group. APRV also significantly mitigates lung histopathologic injury determined by the lung histopathological injury score (p < 0.05) and gross pathological changes of lung tissues. The protein contents of occludin (p < 0.05), claudin-5 (p < 0.05), E-cadherin (p < 0.05), and VE-cadherin (p < 0.05) in the middle lobe of the right lung were higher in the APRV group than in the LTV group; among them, the contents of occludin (p < 0.05) and E-cadherin (p < 0.05) of the whole lung were higher in the APRV group. Transmission electron microscopy showed that alveolar-capillary barrier damage was more severe in the middle lobe of lungs in the LTV group. Conclusion: In comparison with LTV, APRV could preserve the alveolar-capillary barrier architecture, mitigate lung histopathologic injury, increase the expression of cell junction protein, improve respiratory system compliance, and showed a trend to reduce extravascular lung water and improve oxygenation. These findings indicated that APRV might lead to more profound beneficial effects on the integrity of the alveolar-capillary barrier architecture and on the expression of biomarkers related to pulmonary permeability.

Does airway pressure release ventilation offer new hope for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is an essential life support method for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is one of the most common critical illnesses with high mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). A lung-protective ventilation strategy based on low tidal volume (LTV) has been recommended since a few years; however, as this did not result in a significant decrease of ARDS-related mortality, a more optimal ventilation mode was required. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is an old method defined as a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with a brief intermittent release phase based on the open lung concept; it also perfectly fits the ARDS treatment principle. Despite this, APRV has not been widely used in the past, rather only as a rescue measure for ARDS patients who are difficult to oxygenate. Over recent years, with an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ARDS, APRV has been reproposed to improve patient prognosis. Nevertheless, this mode is still not routinely used in ARDS patients given its vague definition and complexity. Consequently, in this paper, we summarize the studies that used APRV in ARDS, including adults, children, and animals, to illustrate the settings of parameters, effectiveness in the population, safety (especially in children), incidence, and mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and effects on extrapulmonary organs. Finally, we found that APRV is likely associated with improvement in ARDS outcomes, and does not increase injury to the lungs and other organs, thereby indicating that personalized APRV settings may be the new hope for ARDS treatment.

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictor for severe COVID-19 : Evidence from a multicenter case-control study and meta-analyses.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can predict severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter case-control study was conducted to investigate whether the NLR can help predict the severity of COVID-19. Patients confirmed to have COVID-19 between 16 January 2020 and 15 March 2020 were enrolled. Furthermore, meta-analyses were conducted based on both previous studies and our case-control study. RESULTS: In the case-control study, 213 patients (severe: 81) were included. The results suggested that the NLR was an independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR], 1.155, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.043-1.279, P = 0.006) and a great predictor (the area under the ROC curve was 0.728, 95% CI: 0.656-0.800) for severe COVID-19. In total, 18 datasets from 16 studies combined with our case-control study (severe: 1211; non-severe: 5838) were included in the meta-analyses and the results showed that the NLR of the severe COVID-19 group was significantly higher than that of the non-severe group (SMD = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.90-1.31, P < 0.001). Based on the 2â€¯× 2 data from 6 studies, the SROC of NLR for predicting severe COVID-19 was 0.802, with a sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.72) and a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.73-0.78). CONCLUSION: Based on a multicenter case-control study and a meta-analysis, we found that the initial NLR was a great predictor of severe COVID-19.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive biomarker for moderate-severe ARDS in severe COVID-19 patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000029758. Registered 12 February 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

[Association of Glucose Variability and ICU Delirium of Patients after Liver Transplantation].

OBJECTIVE: To study the association of glucose variability and ICU delirium of patients after liver transplantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Patients who admitted to ICU after liver transplantation during Aug. 2016 to Dec. 2018 were enrolled. They were divided into two groups accoding to whether they had delirium in ICU. Multivariate logistic regression analysis model was used to analyze the relationship between glucose variability and ICU delirium, and Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to analyze the linear relationship between blood glucose variability levels and the incidence of delirium. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were enrolled, among them, 36 patients had delirium. The occurrence rate of delirium was 14.9% (36/242). Results indicated that glucose variability was an independently risk factor of ICU delirium for liver transplant patients ( P=0.045), and delirium was more common in patients with higher glucose variability (fourth quartile vs. first quartile, odds ratio =5.283, 95% confidence interval: 1.092～25.550, P=0.038). Results of Cochran-Armitage trend test indicated that there was a linear relationship between blood glucose variability level and ICU delirium rate, with the increase of glucose variability level, the risk of ICU delirium was increased too ( P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Glucose variability was an independently risk factor of ICU delirium in liver transplantation patients.

Can High-flow Nasal Cannula Reduce the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on adult patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) are controversial. We aimed to further determine the effectiveness of HFNC in reducing the rate of endotracheal intubation in adult patients with ARF by comparison to noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, as well as the Information Sciences Institute Web of Science, were searched for all controlled studies that compared HFNC with NIPPV and COT in adult patients with ARF. The primary outcome was the rate of endotracheal intubation; the secondary outcomes were ICU mortality and length of ICU stay. RESULTS: Eighteen trials with a total of 3,881 patients were pooled in our final studies. Except for ICU mortality (I2 = 67%, χ2 = 12.21, P = .02) and rate of endotracheal intubation (I2 = 63%, χ2 = 13.51, P = .02) between HFNC and NIPPV, no significant heterogeneity was found in outcome measures. Compared with COT, HFNC was associated with a lower rate of endotracheal intubation (z = 2.55, P = .01) while no significant difference was found in the comparison with NIPPV (z = 1.40, P = .16). As for ICU mortality and length of ICU stay, HFNC did not exhibit any advantage over either COT or NIPPV. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ARF, HFNC is a more reliable alternative than NIPPV to reduce the rate of endotracheal intubation than COT.