Phase I trial of oncolytic adenovirus-mediated cytotoxic and interleukin-12 gene therapy for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

The safety of oncolytic adenovirus-mediated suicide and interleukin-12 (IL 12) gene therapy was evaluated in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. In this phase I study, a replication-competent adenovirus (Ad5-yCD/mutTKSR39 rep-hIL-12) expressing yCD/mutTKSR39 (yeast cytidine deaminase/mutant S39R HSV-1 thymidine kinase) and human IL-12 (IL 12) was injected into tumors of 12 subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer (T2N0M1-T4N1M1) at escalating doses (1 × 1011, 3 × 1011, or 1 × 1012 viral particles). Subjects received 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) therapy for 7 days followed by chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/albumin-bound paclitaxel) starting 21 days after adenovirus injection. The study endpoint was toxicity through day 21. Experimental endpoints included measurements of serum IL 12, interferon gamma (IFNG), and CXCL10 to assess immune system activation. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and proliferation markers were analyzed by flow cytometry. Twelve patients received Ad5-yCD/mutTKSR39 rep-hIL-12 and oral 5-FC. Approximately 94% of the 121 adverse events observed were grade 1/2 requiring no medical intervention. Ad5-yCD/mutTKSR39 rep-hIL-12 DNA was detected in the blood of two patients. Elevated serum IL 12, IFNG, and CXCL10 levels were detected in 42%, 75%, and 92% of subjects, respectively. Analysis of immune cell populations indicated activation after Ad5-yCD/mutTKSR39 rep-hIL-12 administration. The median survival of patients in the third cohort is 18.1 (range, 3.5-20.0) months. The study maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached.

Prospective randomized phase 2 trial of intensity modulated radiation therapy with or without oncolytic adenovirus-mediated cytotoxic gene therapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of combining oncolytic adenovirus-mediated cytotoxic gene therapy (OAMCGT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-four men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive either OAMCGT plus IMRT (arm 1; n=21) or IMRT only (arm 2; n=23). The primary phase 2 endpoint was acute (≤90 days) toxicity. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (QOL), prostate biopsy (12-core) positivity at 2 years, freedom from biochemical/clinical failure (FFF), freedom from metastases, and survival. RESULTS: Men in arm 1 exhibited a greater incidence of low-grade influenza-like symptoms, transaminitis, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia than men in arm 2. There were no significant differences in gastrointestinal or genitourinary events or QOL between the 2 arms. Two-year prostate biopsies were obtained from 37 men (84%). Thirty-three percent of men in arm 1 were biopsy-positive versus 58% in arm 2, representing a 42% relative reduction in biopsy positivity in the investigational arm (P=.13). There was a 60% relative reduction in biopsy positivity in the investigational arm in men with <50% positive biopsy cores at baseline (P=.07). To date, 1 patient in each arm exhibited biochemical failure (arm 1, 4.8%; arm 2, 4.3%). No patient developed hormone-refractory or metastatic disease, and none has died from prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Combining OAMCGT with IMRT does not exacerbate the most common side effects of prostate radiation therapy and suggests a clinically meaningful reduction in positive biopsy results at 2 years in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Feasibility of adenovirus-mediated hNIS gene transfer and 131I radioiodine therapy as a definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer.

We have developed a replication-competent adenovirus (Ad5-yCD/mutTK(SR39)rep-hNIS) armed with two suicide genes and the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) gene. In this context, hNIS can be used as a reporter gene in conjunction with nuclear imaging and as a potentially therapeutic gene when combined with (131)I radioiodine therapy. Here, we quantified the volume and magnitude of hNIS gene expression in the human prostate following injection of a high Ad5-yCD/mutTK(SR39)rep-hNIS dose using a standardized injection algorithm, and estimated the radiation dose that would be delivered to the prostate had men been administered (131)I with curative intent. Six men with clinically localized prostate cancer received an intraprostatic injection of Ad5-yCD/mutTK(SR39)rep-hNIS under transrectal ultrasound guidance. All men received 2 × 0.5 ml deposits (5 × 10(11) vp/deposit) in each of the four base and midgland sextants and 2 × 0.25 ml deposits (2.5 × 10(11) vp/deposit) in each of the two apex sextants for a total of 12 deposits (5 × 10(12) vp) in 5 ml. On multiple days after the adenovirus injection, men were administered sodium pertechnetate (Na(99m)TcO(4)) and hNIS gene expression in the prostate was quantified by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). hNIS gene expression was detected in the prostate of six of six (100%) men. On average, 45% (range 18-83%) of the prostate volume was covered with gene expression. Had men been administered 200 mCi (131)I, we estimate that the mean absorbed dose to the prostate would be 7.2 ± 4.8 Gy (range 2.1-13.3 Gy), well below that needed to sterilize the prostate. We discuss the obstacles that must be overcome before adenovirus-mediated hNIS gene transfer and (131)I radioiodine therapy can be used as a definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Risk factors for breast cancer from benign breast disease in a diverse population.

BACKGROUND: The majority of studies have reported risks of breast cancer (BC) from benign breast disease (BBD) in essentially homogenous Caucasian populations. Information on breast cancer risk factors in larger, multi-ethnic populations should facilitate the development of appropriate and targeted risk reduction strategies. DESIGN: Cases and controls were drawn from a parent BBD cohort of 4,970 women, 1,341 African-Americans (AA) and 3,629 non-AA who were diagnosed with BBD after examination of an excisional breast biopsy. Risk factors (34 variables) included demographics, lesion types, and epidemiological variables. RESULTS: The final multivariable model retained significance (P < 0.05) for lesion risk-level, fibroadenoma, and the interaction of age-by-race. Women with proliferative lesions (no atypia, risk level 2) were 1.7 times more likely to develop BC when compared with women with non-proliferative lesions (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.13, 2.42, P = 0.009). Women with atypia (risk level 3) were 3.75 times more likely to develop BC compared to women with non-proliferative lesions (OR = 3.75, 95% CI 1.99, 7.06, P < 0.001). The odds of breast cancer was approximately 35% lower among women with fibroadenoma as compared to women without fibroadenoma (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46, 0.94, P = 0.020). AA women with BBD who were 50 years or older were 2.28 times more likely to develop breast cancer as compared to non-AA women who were less than 50 years old (OR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.34, 3.88, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Women with fibroadenoma (nonproliferative or proliferative) were less likely to progress to BC. Older AA women are at greater risk for progression to breast cancer from BBD.

Benign breast disease heterogeneity: association with histopathology, age, and ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: Benign breast biopsies with concurrent multiple benign lesions with different histopathologic diagnoses were termed heterogeneous benign breast disease (HBBD). Multiplicity of benign breast disease (BBD) lesions in a biopsy is a risk factor for progression to breast cancer (BC). Elucidation of the biological characteristics and clinical implications of HBBD may also be relevant to the refinement of risks for BC in women with a BBD diagnosis. DESIGN: In this study, we investigated the association of HBBD with histopathology, age, and ethnicity. A cohort of 4,341 women, 1,208 African Americans and 3,133 Caucasians, diagnosed with BBD, was identified after examination of an excisional breast biopsy. BBD biopsies were categorized as nonproliferative (NP, low risk or risk 1 lesions), proliferative without atypia (P, intermediate risk or risk 2 lesions), and proliferative with atypia (AH, high risk or risk 3 lesions). A BBD biopsy with only a single BBD lesion was termed simple BBD (SBBD). BBD biopsies with multiple lesions were further classified as single level HBBD (SL-HBBD) if the concurrent lesions were within the same risk level, or as multiple level HBBD (ML-HBBD) if lesions fell into more than one risk group. RESULTS: In this cohort, 69% of women with a BBD diagnosis fit the HBBD criteria. Among women with HBBD, ML-HBBD was almost three times more prevalent than SL-HBBD and was significantly more likely to be composed of risk 2 and risk 3 lesions. The likelihood of HBBD was 57% higher in Caucasian American women than in African American women with BBD (OR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.37, 1.81). The average lesion number in HBBD was directly proportional to increasing lesion risk (P < 0.001). Compared to women with risk 1 lesions, the likelihood of HBBD was 5.59 (95% CI: 4.85-6.44) and 17.0 (95% CI: 10.2-28.5) times higher when risk 2 and risk 3 lesions, respectively, were present. Women in the age range of 46-55 years and >55 years had a 3.12 (95% CI: 2.59, 3.75) and a 2.28 (95% CI: 1.94, 2.68) fold higher likelihood of HBBD compared to those < or =45 years. Significant interaction was found between concurrent lesion levels and age (P < 0.01). The likelihood of HBBD was considerably higher across all age groups for risk 3 lesions. Compared to the reference (risk 1, age < or =45), the likelihood of HBBD for risk 2 lesions was 4.4 times greater (95% CI: 3.70, 5.33) in women < or =45 YEARS, BUT THAT LIKELIHOOD INCREASED TO 17.6 (95% CI: 12.8, 24.2) AND 13.4 (95% CI: 10.1, 17.9) TIMES IN WOMEN OF 46-55 AND >55 YEARS, RESPECTIVELY. CONCLUSION: HBBD is more prevalent in Caucasian American women than in African American women. Women with higher risk BBD lesions are more likely to have HBBD. Lesion number and higher risk BBD lesions are significantly correlated with ML-HBBD. Additionally, the associations of HBBD and lesion risk level are modified by age.

Multiplicity of benign breast lesions is a risk factor for progression to breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Benign breast disease (BBD) in women encompasses a broad spectrum of histopathologic lesions. Studies on BBD have focused on the risks for subsequent breast cancer associated with three broad categories of lesions, classified as nonproliferative, proliferative, or proliferative with atypia, without addressing the issue of the contribution of concurrent multiple BBD lesions. There is very limited information with regard to the issue of BBD lesion multiplicity and breast cancer risk. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated a detailed microscopic spectrum of 18 BBD lesions from fibrosis to atypical hyperplasia in a BBD cohort of 4,544 subjects, within which 4.5% (n = 201) developed breast cancer during an average follow-up period of 10.3 years. Lesions were defined as nonproliferative (8 diagnoses; risk level 1 = no risk or low risk), proliferative without atypical hyperplasia (8 diagnoses; risk level 2 = intermediate risk), and proliferative with atypical hyperplasia (2 diagnoses; risk level 3 = highest risk level). Twenty variables including age (> or =50 or <50 years) at the time of BBD diagnosis and race (African American or non-African American) were assessed. A categorical variable, surrogate for lesion type and number, was represented initially by four levels: 1, nonproliferative = 1 (reference); 2, nonproliferative > 1; 3, proliferative = 1; and 4, proliferative > 1. RESULTS: The majority of BBD subjects in our cohort (almost 70%) had more than one BBD lesion. Concurrent multiple nonproliferative or proliferative BBD lesions with or without atypia in a BBD biopsy and age are significant predictors of risk for progression of BBD to breast cancer. The presence of atypical hyperplasia in a BBD biopsy alone or in conjunction with other lesions without atypia conferred higher risks. Women with fibrosis had a reduced risk for progression to breast cancer. Race was not a significant predictor of progression to breast cancer. The effect of age, fibrosis, and multiple lesions (whether nonproliferative, proliferative, or atypia) on breast cancer progression was not influenced by race. CONCLUSION: BBD lesion multiplicity is frequent, and teasing out the heterogeneity of multiple concurrent BBD lesions is warranted to refine and improve risk estimates for progression of breast cancer from BBD.

Breast cancer incidence in a cohort of women with benign breast disease from a multiethnic, primary health care population.

Women with benign breast diseases (BBD), particularly those with lesions classified as proliferative, have previously been reported to be at increased risk for subsequent development of breast cancer (BC). A cohort of 4970 women with biopsy-proven BBD, identified after histopathology review of BBD biopsies, was studied for determination of subsequent development of BC. We report on 4537 eligible women, 28% of whom are African-American, whose BBD mass was evaluable for pathologic assessment of breast tissue. Ascertainment of subsequent progression to BC from BBD was accomplished through examination of the tumor registries of the Henry Ford Health system, the Detroit SEER registry, and the State of Michigan cancer registry. Incidence rates (IR) are reported per 100,000 person years at risk (100 k pyr). Poisson regression models were used to evaluate the association of demographic and lesion characteristics with BC incidence, using person years at the time of BBD diagnosis as the offset variable. The estimated overall BC IR for this cohort is 452 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 394-519) per 100 k pyr. Incidence for women age 50 and older is 80% greater than for younger women (p = 0.007, IRR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.36-2.36). Neither marital status (p = 0.91, IRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.73-1.29) nor race (p = 0.67, IRR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.54-1.48) is associated with differences in BC IR. Compared with women having nonproliferative lesions, the risk for BC is greater for women with atypical ductal hyperplasia of (IRR = 5.0; 95%CI = 2.26-11.0; p < 0.001) and other proliferative lesions (IR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.02-2.95; p = 0.04). BC risk for woman with atypical lesions is significantly higher than for women with proliferative lesions without atypia (IRR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.35-4.90; p = 0.0039). Neither race nor marital status was a factor for BC incidence from BBD in this cohort. Age retained its importance as a predictor of risk. BBD lesion histopathology in the outcome categories of either proliferative without atypia or proliferative with atypia are significant risk factors for BC, even when adjusted for the influence of demographic characteristics. The risks associated with BBD histological classifications were not different across races.