A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) vs. Standard Materials Used in Orthodontic Fixed Appliances: A Systematic Review.

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), an organic thermoplastic polymer, has gained interest in dentistry due to its excellent mechanical strength, flexibility, and biocompatibility. Furthermore, the ability to utilize CAD/CAM in the fabrication of PEEK enhances accuracy, reliability, and efficiency while also saving time. Hence, several orthodontic studies have explored the utilization of PEEK in various applications, such as archwires, brackets, fixed lingual retainers, palatal expansion devices, transpalatal arches, Tübingen palatal plates, different types of space maintainers, mini-implant insertion guides, and more. However, a complete systematic review of the available data comparing the performance of PEEK with traditional orthodontic materials has not yet been conducted. Therefore, this systematic review seeks to assess if PEEK material meets the required mechanical criteria to serve as an alternative to conventional orthodontic appliances. To ensure clarity and precision, this review will specifically concentrate on fixed appliances. This systemic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and utilized databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Springer, Web of Science, and Wiley. Searches were restricted to English language articles from January 2013 to February 2024. Keywords such as "Polyetheretherketone" or "PEEK" and "Orthodontic" or "Orthodontic device" or "Orthodontic materials" were employed across all databases. Nine studies were incorporated, covering orthodontic archwires, brackets, and fixed lingual retainers. Based on the reviewed literature, PEEK demonstrates promising potential in orthodontic fixed appliances, offering advantages in force delivery, friction reduction, and aesthetic appeal. Further research is needed to fully explore its capabilities and optimize its application in clinical practice.

Three-dimensional analysis of posed smile in adults: A scoping review.

This scoping review investigated the evidence on the three-dimensional analysis of a posed smile in adults to discover any research gaps in this research area. Electronic searches of articles written in English were performed using the four databases of Embase, PubMed, Springer, and Web of Science with publications from 2010 to 2023. Reference lists were also manually searched to identify additional studies. The results showed that 13 cross-sectional descriptive studies from Asia, Europe, North and South America met our inclusion criteria. Studies mainly focused on linear and angle measurement for resting and smiling faces and landmark movement from resting to smiling. Most studies conducted analysis of smiles stratified by sex, ethnicity, smile type, dental occlusion, skeletal pattern, and age. Two studies compared smiling with the resting position and one study compared the attractive smiling group with the ordinary group. Our scoping review revealed the insufficiency of some measurement methods, such as those employing area, volume, and soft tissue thickness. Furthermore, few studies were conducted in Asian populations, and comparisons of various smile types, overjet types, horizontal skeletal patterns, and comparisons of smiles between people with untreated normal occlusion and those who had been orthodontically treated were lacking.

Assessment of mechanical characteristics of polyetheretherketone as orthodontic fixed lingual retainers.

Background/purpose: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is known for its strength, flexibility, biocompatibility, and potential as a replacement for metals in dental appliances; however, uncertainty remains about the mechanical characteristics and dimensions of PEEK-made orthodontic fixed lingual retainers (FLRs). This study aimed to determine the optimal shape of PEEK-made orthodontic FLRs using the finite element method (FEM) and the three-point bending test (TPBT). Materials and methods: Seventy-five three-dimensional PEEK rod-shaped models were created, which included five thicknesses (0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mm), five widths (0.7, 0.9, 1.1, 1.3, and 1.5 mm), and three cross-sectional shapes (rectangular, oval, and hemielliptical). A 0.9-mm (0.036-inch) stainless steel wire (SSW) was used as a control and the FEM was used to determine six optimal dimensions among the PEEK models. The selected models were then fabricated and subjected, along with the SSW, to the experimental TPBT to assess their mechanical responses against lingual and biting pressures. Results: The FEM analysis revealed that Von Mises stresses on the PEEK models decreased with an increase in width and thickness. Six optimal shapes of PEEK models were chosen based on acceptable lingual and biting stresses as well as patient comfort compared to the SSW. Furthermore, PEEK models showed significantly lower deformation during the 3.1-mm deflection test than did the SSW, while no notable differences were observed among different sizes of PEEK models. The hemielliptical PEEK model with a thickness of 1.0 mm and width of 1.5 mm was found to be mechanically robust enough to withstand lingual forces, while none of the PEEK models, including the SSW, were able to resist biting forces. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, PEEK-made orthodontic FLRs with a hemielliptical cross-sectional shape and a thickness-to-width ratio of 1.0:1.5 would be suitable for use as orthodontic FLRs.

Factors affecting perception of laypeople and dental professionals toward different smile esthetics.

Abstract Background: /purpose: Several factors such as identity, income, and age potentially associated with smile perceptions. This study aimed to identify the factors affecting the smile esthetic perception in different identities (layperson, general dentist and orthodontist) and to detect the extent of their association with smile perception. Materials and methods: Extraoral photographs in frontal, lateral, and three-quarter views were shot and adjusted on Adobe Photoshop into 95 smile photographs with different smile patterns. Based on these photographs, the investigators were asked to fill the online questionnaire. Pearson chi-square test and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. Results: Identity, gender, age, and treatment experience were noted to affect smile esthetic perception. In addition, the perception of smile esthetics was significantly different among frontal, lateral, and three-quarters views regarding the arc ratio, most posterior teeth exposure, upper teeth exposure, and lower teeth exposure. Conclusion: Identity, gender, age, and treatment experience influence the smile esthetics perception, with a significant difference in the results of the esthetic perception based on the 3 smile views. Of all demographic factors, identity had a strong relation to the perception of smile attractiveness. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to realize how the demographic factors influence people's perception of smile esthetics, particularly in the three-quarter and lateral views.

Relationship between craniofacial morphology and congenitally missing mandibular incisors.

Background/purpose: Treatment of incisors' agenesis is challenging that arouses orthodontists' interests. The purpose of this study was to compare the craniofacial pattern of individuals with or without congenitally missing mandibular incisors. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients receiving orthodontic consultation between 1999 and 2019 at the Orthodontic Division of the Dental Department of Taipei Medical University Hospital. Cephalometric measurements were obtained through manual tracing and by using computer software. A total of 31 measurements were obtained to evaluate skeletal, dental and soft tissues, and chin morphology. A multivariate analysis of covariance, analysis of covariance, and Scheffé's post hoc tests were used to analyze the differences among a group of patients with one congenitally missing mandibular incisor (M1), a group of patients with two congenitally missing mandibular incisors (M2), and the control group. Student's t-test was used to analyze the differences between the M1 or M2 group and the control group. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Significant differences were observed between the M and control groups in terms of lower incisor angulation and facial balance. Regarding chin morphology, significant differences were noted between the M and control groups and also among the M1, M2, and control groups. Conclusion: The lower incisors of the M group are more retroclined than those of the control group, resulting in retrusive lower lips. Facial balance varies between the M and control groups. Congenitally missing mandibular incisors affect chin morphology, making the chin button prominent.

Effect of anterior overbite malocclusion on smile esthetics in adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether overbite affects smile esthetics. METHODS: This study involved 106 patients with complete pretreatment records. Lateral cephalometric tracings were used to measure hard tissue variables. Frontal smile and upper occlusal photographs were used to measure nine smile esthetic variables: arc ratio, number of teeth, upper incisor exposure, upper midline, buccal corridor ratio, smile index, archform index, lower teeth exposure, and interlabial gap. The patients were classified into three groups according to their overbites (B1: 0-4 mm, B2: >4 mm, and B3: <0 mm). Analysis of variance was performed to compare 14 cephalometric measurements and the 9 smile esthetic variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the influencing cephalometric factors. RESULTS: Only upper incisor exposure was significantly different among the groups. In the multiple linear regression analysis, upper incisor exposure was positively associated with the distance from the upper incisor to the palatal plane in Group B2. No significant correlations were observed between cephalometric measurements and smile variables in Groups B1 and B3. CONCLUSIONS: Smile variables were not significantly different among patients with various overbite malocclusions with the exception of upper incisor exposure. Overbite malocclusions do not appear to influence smile esthetics in adult patients.

Smile preferences of orthodontists, general dentists, patients, and the general public in three-quarter and lateral views.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyze differences in esthetic smile preferences between Thai dentists and the general population and determine factors that affect smile perception. For the analysis, in addition to the frontal smile view, the three-quarter and lateral smile views were considered. METHODS: A computer-based questionnaire was used that comprised a demographic survey and multiple photographs of smiles. In total, 61 orthodontists, 180 general dentists, 378 orthodontic patients, and 421 laypersons were asked to select the most preferred digitally altered smile for each variable in the frontal, three-quarter, and lateral views. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests with post-hoc tests were used for comparing groups. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influence of demographic factors on smile esthetics. Significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Chi-square tests revealed significant differences in preference between men and women and between the professional and nonprofessional groups for almost all variables. Demographic factors influenced smile esthetics in the nonprofessional group. CONCLUSIONS: Both sex and dental knowledge background affected smile preference. The smile preferences of observers varied based on the view, and therefore, the lateral and three-quarter views should be routinely included in smile analyses. Demographics negligibly affected smile perception in the professional group, whereas they significantly affected perceptions in the nonprofessional group, especially age and education.

The relationship between dentofacial morphology and smile characteristics in lateral and oblique views.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to develop smile measurements for lateral and oblique view photographs to help in orthodontic analysis and treatment planning, to quantitatively evaluate the relationship between smile esthetics and different types of malocclusion using lateral and oblique view photographs, to identify the cephalometric factors affecting smile measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who came to orthodontic department of a university hospital from 2014 to 2017 and met the inclusion criteria were included and divided into three groups according to Angle's classification. Thirteen variables were measured for cephalometric analysis. Twenty-one variables were developed and measured on pretreatment photographs for lateral and oblique smile analysis. ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc test were used to compare cephalometric and smile variables among three groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify cephalometric factors affecting smile measurements. RESULTS: Three-hundred and ninety patients (287 females, 103 males) with mean age of 24.5 ±â€¯7.6 years reached the criteria. All cephalometric variables differed significantly among three groups. Except for maxillary teeth exposure number, visible maxillary width, and lip thickness ratio, all smile variables differed significantly. Smile characteristics had significant correlation with some cephalometric measurements. CONCLUSION: Smile patterns on the lateral and oblique view photographs can be affected by different types of malocclusion. Therefore, we suggest to include lateral and oblique smile view photographs in the data collection for orthodontic treatment planning.