US-based Sequential Algorithm Integrating an AI Model for Advanced Liver Fibrosis Screening.

Background Noninvasive tests can be used to screen patients with chronic liver disease for advanced liver fibrosis; however, the use of single tests may not be adequate. Purpose To construct sequential clinical algorithms that include a US deep learning (DL) model and compare their ability to predict advanced liver fibrosis with that of other noninvasive tests. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included adult patients with a history of chronic liver disease or unexplained abnormal liver function test results who underwent B-mode US of the liver between January 2014 and September 2022 at three health care facilities. A US-based DL network (FIB-Net) was trained on US images to predict whether the shear-wave elastography (SWE) value was 8.7 kPa or higher, indicative of advanced fibrosis. In the internal and external test sets, a two-step algorithm (Two-step#1) using the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) followed by FIB-Net and a three-step algorithm (Three-step#1) using FIB-4 followed by FIB-Net and SWE were used to simulate screening scenarios where liver stiffness measurements were not or were available, respectively. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated using liver biopsy as the reference standard and compared between FIB-4, SWE, FIB-Net, and European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines (ie, FIB-4 followed by SWE), along with sequential algorithms. Results The training, validation, and test data sets included 3067 (median age, 42 years [IQR, 33-53 years]; 2083 male), 1599 (median age, 41 years [IQR, 33-51 years]; 1124 male), and 1228 (median age, 44 years [IQR, 33-55 years]; 741 male) patients, respectively. FIB-Net obtained a noninferior specificity with a margin of 5% (P < .001) compared with SWE (80% vs 82%). The Two-step#1 algorithm showed higher specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) than FIB-4 (specificity, 79% vs 57%; PPV, 44% vs 32%) while reducing unnecessary referrals by 42%. The Three-step#1 algorithm had higher specificity and PPV compared with European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines (specificity, 94% vs 88%; PPV, 73% vs 64%) while reducing unnecessary referrals by 35%. Conclusion A sequential algorithm combining FIB-4 and a US DL model showed higher diagnostic accuracy and improved referral management for all-cause advanced liver fibrosis compared with FIB-4 or the DL model alone. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Ghosh in this issue.

Complementary Role of CEUS and CT/MR LI-RADS for Diagnosis of Recurrent HCC.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computer tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After curative treatment with 421 ultrasound (US) detected lesions, 303 HCC patients underwent both CEUS and CT/MRI. Each lesion was assigned a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category according to CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed to determine the optimal diagnosis algorithms for CEUS, CT and MRI. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between CEUS and CT/MRI. RESULTS: Among the 421 lesions, 218 were diagnosed as recurrent HCC, whereas 203 lesions were diagnosed as benign. In recurrent HCC, CEUS detected more arterial hyperenhancement (APHE) and washout than CT and more APHE than MRI. CEUS yielded better diagnostic performance than CT (AUC: 0.981 vs. 0.958) (p = 0.024) comparable diagnostic performance to MRI (AUC: 0.952 vs. 0.933) (p > 0.05) when using their optimal diagnostic criteria. CEUS missed 12 recurrent HCCs, CT missed one, and MRI missed none. The detection rate of recurrent HCC on CEUS (94.8%, 218/230) was lower than that on CT/MRI (99.6%, 259/260) (p = 0.001). Lesions located on the US blind spots and visualization score C would hinder the ability of CEUS to detect recurrent HCC. CONCLUSION: CEUS demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance but an inferior detection rate for recurrent HCC. CEUS and CT/MRI played a complementary role in the detection and characterization of recurrent HCC.

US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the performance of US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after curative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 644 patients between January 2018 and August 2018 as a derivation cohort, and 397 patients from September 2018 to December 2018 as a validation cohort. The US surveillance after HCC curative treatment was performed. The US LI-RADS observation categories and visualization scores were analyzed. Four criteria using US LI-RADS or Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as the surveillance algorithm were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 212 (32.9%) patients in derivation cohort and 158 (39.8%) patients in validation cohort were detected to have RHCCs. The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L had higher sensitivity (derivation, 96.7% vs 92.9% vs 81.1% vs 90.6%; validation, 96.2% vs 90.5% vs 80.4% vs 89.9%) and NPV (derivation, 95.7% vs 93.3% vs 88.0% vs 91.8%; validation, 94.6% vs 89.4% vs 83.6% vs 89.0%), but lower specificity (derivation, 35.9% vs 48.2% vs 67.6% vs 51.9%; validation, 43.5% vs 52.7% vs 66.1% vs 54.0%) than criterion of US-2/3, US-3, and US-3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L. Analysis of the visualization score subgroups confirmed that the sensitivity (89.2-97.6% vs 81.0-83.3%) and NPV(88.4-98.0% vs 80.0-83.3%) of score A and score B groups were higher than score C group in criterion of US-2/3 in both two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In the surveillance for RHCC, US LI-RADS with AFP had a high sensitivity and NPV when US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L was considered a criterion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The criterion of US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L improves sensitivity and NPV for RHCC surveillance, which provides a valuable reference for patients in RHCC surveillance after curative treatment. KEY POINTS: • US LI-RADS with AFP had high sensitivity and NPV in surveillance for RHCC when considering US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L as a criterion. • After US with AFP surveillance, patients with US-2/3 or AFP ≥ 20 µg/L should perform enhanced imaging for confirmative diagnosis. Patients with US-1 or AFP < 20 µg/L continue to repeat US with AFP surveillance. • Patients with risk factors for poor visualization scores limited the sensitivity of US surveillance in RHCC.

Surveillance for malignant progression of LI-RADS version 2017 category 3/4 nodules using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for predicting the malignant progression of LR-3/4 observations on the baseline and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: In total, 245 liver nodules assigned to LR-3/4 in 192 patients from January 2010 to December 2016 were followed up by baseline US and CEUS. The differences in the rate and time of progression to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among subcategories (defined as P1-P7) of LR-3/4 in CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) were analyzed. The risk factors to predict progression to HCC were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40.3% of LR-3 nodules and 78.9% of LR-4 nodules eventually progressed to HCC. The cumulative incidence of progression was significantly higher for LR-4 than LR-3 (p < 0.001). The rate of progression was 81.2% in nodules with arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), 64.7% in nodules with late and mild washout, and 100% in nodules with both characteristics. The overall progression rate and median progression time of subcategory P1 nodules (LR-3a) were lower (38.0% vs. 47.6-100.0%) and later (25.1 months vs. 2.0-16.3 months) than those of other subcategories. The cumulative incidence of progression of LR-3a (P1), LR-3b (P2/3/4), and LR-4 (P5/6/7) categories were 38.0%, 52.9%, and 78.9%. The risk factors of HCC progression were Visualization score B/C, CEUS characteristics (APHE, washout), LR-4 classification, echo changes, and definite growth. CONCLUSION: CEUS is a useful surveillance tool for nodules at risk of HCC. CEUS characteristics, LI-RADS classification, and changes in nodules provide useful information for the progress of LR-3/4 nodules. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CEUS characteristics, LI-RADS classification, and nodule changes provide important predictions for LR-3/4 nodule progression to HCC, which may stratify the risk of malignant progression to provide a more optimized and refined, more cost-effective, and time-efficient management strategy for patients. KEY POINTS: • CEUS is a useful surveillance tool for nodules at risk of HCC, CEUS LI-RADS successfully stratified the risks that progress to HCC. • CEUS characteristics, LI-RADS classification, and changes in nodules can provide important information on the progression of LR-3/4 nodules, which may be helpful for a more optimized and refined management strategy.

Integration of Artificial Intelligence Decision Aids to Reduce Workload and Enhance Efficiency in Thyroid Nodule Management.

Importance: To optimize the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) decision aids and reduce workload in thyroid nodule management, it is critical to incorporate personalized AI into the decision-making processes of radiologists with varying levels of expertise. Objective: To develop an optimized integration of AI decision aids for reducing radiologists' workload while maintaining diagnostic performance compared with traditional AI-assisted strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study, a retrospective set of 1754 ultrasonographic images of 1048 patients with 1754 thyroid nodules from July 1, 2018, to July 31, 2019, was used to build an optimized strategy based on how 16 junior and senior radiologists incorporated AI-assisted diagnosis results with different image features. In the prospective set of this diagnostic study, 300 ultrasonographic images of 268 patients with 300 thyroid nodules from May 1 to December 31, 2021, were used to compare the optimized strategy with the traditional all-AI strategy in terms of diagnostic performance and workload reduction. Data analyses were completed in September 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The retrospective set of images was used to develop an optimized integration of AI decision aids for junior and senior radiologists based on the selection of AI-assisted significant or nonsignificant features. In the prospective set of images, the diagnostic performance, time-based cost, and assisted diagnosis were compared between the optimized strategy and the traditional all-AI strategy. Results: The retrospective set included 1754 ultrasonographic images from 1048 patients (mean [SD] age, 42.1 [13.2] years; 749 women [71.5%]) with 1754 thyroid nodules (mean [SD] size, 16.4 [10.6] mm); 748 nodules (42.6%) were benign, and 1006 (57.4%) were malignant. The prospective set included 300 ultrasonographic images from 268 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [14.1] years; 194 women [72.4%]) with 300 thyroid nodules (mean [SD] size, 17.2 [6.8] mm); 125 nodules (41.7%) were benign, and 175 (58.3%) were malignant. For junior radiologists, the ultrasonographic features that were not improved by AI assistance included cystic or almost completely cystic nodules, anechoic nodules, spongiform nodules, and nodules smaller than 5 mm, whereas for senior radiologists the features that were not improved by AI assistance were cystic or almost completely cystic nodules, anechoic nodules, spongiform nodules, very hypoechoic nodules, nodules taller than wide, lobulated or irregular nodules, and extrathyroidal extension. Compared with the traditional all-AI strategy, the optimized strategy was associated with increased mean task completion times for junior radiologists (reader 11, from 15.2 seconds [95% CI, 13.2-17.2 seconds] to 19.4 seconds [95% CI, 15.6-23.3 seconds]; reader 12, from 12.7 seconds [95% CI, 11.4-13.9 seconds] to 15.6 seconds [95% CI, 13.6-17.7 seconds]), but shorter times for senior radiologists (reader 14, from 19.4 seconds [95% CI, 18.1-20.7 seconds] to 16.8 seconds [95% CI, 15.3-18.3 seconds]; reader 16, from 12.5 seconds [95% CI, 12.1-12.9 seconds] to 10.0 seconds [95% CI, 9.5-10.5 seconds]). There was no significant difference in sensitivity (range, 91%-100%) or specificity (range, 94%-98%) between the 2 strategies for readers 11 to 16. Conclusions and Relevance: This diagnostic study suggests that an optimized AI strategy in thyroid nodule management may reduce diagnostic time-based costs without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy for senior radiologists, while the traditional all-AI strategy may still be more beneficial for junior radiologists.

Value of Multimodal Data From Clinical and Sonographic Parameters in Predicting Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the work described here was to assess the value of the combination of pre-operative multimodal data-including clinical data, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) information and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) based on 2-D shear wave elastography (SWE)-in predicting early (within 1 y) and late (after 1 y) recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively included 101 patients with HCC who met the Milan criteria and received curative treatment. The multimodel data from clinical parameters, LSM by 2-D SWE and CEUS enhancement patterns were collected. The association between different variables in HCC recurrence was accessed using a Cox proportional hazard model. On the basis of the independent factors of early recurrence, models with different source variables were established (Clinical Model, CEUS-Clinical Model, SWE-Clinical Model, CEUS-SWE-Clinical Model). The goodness-of-fit of models was evaluated and the performance trends of different models were calculated by time-dependent area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Two-dimensional SWE, CEUS enhancement patterns and clinical parameters (spleen length, multiple tumors, α-fetoprotein, albumin and prothrombin time) were independently associated with early recurrence (all p values <0.05). Multiple tumors and a decrease in albumin independently contributed to the late recurrence. The model fit of CEUS-SWE-Clinical Model was superior to other models in predicting early recurrence (all p values <0.05). The AUCs of the CEUS-Clinical Model were higher from 2 mo to 7 mo, while the SWE-Clinical Model had higher AUCs from 9 mo to 12 mo. CONCLUSION: CEUS enhancement patterns and 2-D SWE were independent predictors of HCC early recurrence as the two factors contributed to the predictive performance at different times. The multimodal model, which included diverse data in predicting early HCC recurrence, had the best goodness-of-fit.

Shear-wave elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound algorithm for noninvasive characterization of focal liver lesions.

PURPOSE: To establish shear-wave elastography (SWE) combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) algorithm (SCCA) and improve the diagnostic performance in differentiating focal liver lesions (FLLs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively selected patients with FLLs between January 2018 and December 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Histopathology was used as a standard criterion except for hemangiomas and focal nodular hyperplasia. CEUS with SonoVue (Bracco Imaging) and SCCA combining CEUS and maximum value of elastography with < 20 kPa and > 90 kPa thresholds were used for the diagnosis of FLLs. The diagnostic performance of CEUS and SCCA was calculated and compared. RESULTS: A total of 171 FLLs were included, with 124 malignant FLLs and 47 benign FLLs. The area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity in detecting malignant FLLs were 0.83, 91.94%, and 74.47% for CEUS, respectively, and 0.89, 91.94%, and 85.11% for SCCA, respectively. The AUC of SCCA was significantly higher than that of CEUS (P = 0.019). Decision curves indicated that SCCA provided greater clinical benefits. The SCCA provided significantly improved prediction of clinical outcomes, with a net reclassification improvement index of 10.64% (P = 0.018) and integrated discrimination improvement of 0.106 (P = 0.019). For subgroup analysis, we divided the FLLs into a chronic-liver-disease group (n = 88 FLLs) and a normal-liver group (n = 83 FLLs) according to the liver background. In the chronic-liver-disease group, there were no differences between the CEUS-based and SCCA diagnoses. In the normal-liver group, the AUC of SCCA and CEUS in the characterization of FLLs were 0.89 and 0.83, respectively (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: SCCA is a feasible tool for differentiating FLLs in patients with normal liver backgrounds. Further investigations are necessary to validate the universality of this algorithm.

Identification of the origin of tumor in vein: comparison between CEUS LI-RADS v2017 and v2016 for patients at high risk.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Report and Data System (LI-RADS) v2016 and v2017 in identifying the origin of tumor in vein (TIV). METHODS: From April 2014 to December 2018, focal liver lesions (FLLs) accompanied by TIV formation in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were enrolled. Histologic evaluation or composite imaging reference standard were served as the reference standard. Each case was categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS v2016 and v2017, respectively. Diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS v2016 and v2017 in identifying the originated tumor of TIV was validated via sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value. RESULTS: A total of 273 FLLs with TIV were analyzed finally, including 266 HCCs and 7 non-HCCs. In v2016, when adopting all TIV as LR-5V, the accuracy and PPV in identifying the originated tumor were both 97.4%. In v2017, when assigning TIV according to contiguous FLLs CEUS LI-RADS category, the accuracy and PPV were 61.9% and 99.4% in subclass of LR-5 as the diagnostic criteria of HCC, and 64.1% and 99.4% in subclass of LR-4/5 as the criteria of HCC diagnosis. There were significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between CEUS LI-RADS v2016 and v2017 in identifying the originated tumor of TIV (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS LI-RADS v2016 could be better than v2017 in identifying the originated tumor of TIV.

Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study.

Purpose: The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is still in development. The aim of this study was to explore whether the CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS in evaluating the liver locoregional therapy (LRT) response. Patients and Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing ablation between July 2017 and December 2018. The standard criteria for a viable lesion were a histopathologically confirmed or typical viable appearance in the follow-up CT/MRI. Performance of the LI-RADS TRA assessing tumor viability was then compared between CEUS and CT/MRI. Inter-reader association was calculated. Results: A total of 244 patients with 389 treated observations (118 viable) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA viable categories for predicting viable lesions were 55.0% (65/118) versus 56.8% (67/118) (P = 0.480) and 99.3% (269/271) versus 96.3% (261/271) (P = 0.013), respectively. The PPV of CEUS was higher than that of CT/MRI (97.0% vs 87.0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity was low in the 1-month assessment for both CEUS (38.1%, 16/42) and CT/MR (47.6%, 20/42) and higher in the 2-6-month assessment for both CEUS (65.7%, 23/35) and CT/MR (62.9%, 22/35). Interobserver agreements were substantial for both CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA (κ, 0.74 for both). Conclusion: The CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy. The CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy has sufficiently high specificity and PPV to diagnose the viability of lesions after ablation.

Differentiation between combined hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic performance between ultrasomics-based model and CEUS LI-RADS v2017.

BACKGROUND: The imaging findings of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) may be similar to those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CEUS LI-RADS may not perform well in distinguishing CHC from HCC. Studies have shown that radiomics has an excellent imaging analysis ability. This study aimed to establish and confirm an ultrasomics model for differentiating CHC from HCC. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2016, we retrospectively identified 53 eligible CHC patients and randomly included 106 eligible HCC patients with a ratio of HCC:CHC = 2:1, all of whom were categorized according to Contrast-Enhanced (CE) ultrasonography (US) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017. The model based on ultrasomics features of CE US was developed in 74 HCC and 37 CHC and confirmed in 32 HCC and 16 CHC. The diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS or ultrasomics model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: In the entire and validation cohorts, 67.0% and 81.3% of HCC cases were correctly assigned to LR-5 or LR-TIV contiguous with LR-5, and 73.6% and 87.5% of CHC cases were assigned to LR-M correctly. Up to 33.0% of HCC and 26.4% of CHC were misclassified by CE US LI-RADS. A total of 90.6% of HCC as well as 87.5% of CHC correctly diagnosed by the ultrasomics model in the validation cohort. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity of the ultrasomics model were higher though without significant difference than those of CE US LI-RADS in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The proposed ultrasomics model showed higher ability though the difference was not significantly different for differentiating CHC from HCC, which may be helpful in clinical diagnosis.

Reproducibility of radiomics features from ultrasound images: influence of image acquisition and processing.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically assess the reproducibility of radiomics features from ultrasound (US) images during image acquisition and processing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized phantom was scanned to obtain US images. Reproducibility of radiomics features from US images, also known as ultrasomics features, was explored via (a) intra-US machine: changing the US acquisition parameters including gain, focus, and frequency; (b) inter-US machine: comparing three different scanners; (c) changing segmentation locations; and (d) inter-platform: comparing features extracted by the Ultrasomics and PyRadiomics algorithm platforms. Reproducible ultrasomics features were selected based on coefficients of variation. RESULTS: A total of 108 US images from three scanners were obtained; 5253 ultrasomics features including seven categories of features were extracted and evaluated for each US image. From intra-US machine analysis, 37.0-38.8% of features showed good reproducibility. From inter-US machine analysis, 42.8% (2248/5253) of features exhibited good reproducibility. From segmentation location analysis, 55.7-57.6% of features showed good reproducibility. No significant difference in the normalized feature ranges was found between the 100 features extracted by the Ultrasomics and PyRadiomics platforms with the same algorithm (p = 0.563). A total of 1452 (27.6%) ultrasomics features were reproducible whenever intra-/inter-US machine or segmentation location were changed, most of which were wavelet and shearlet features. CONCLUSIONS: Different acquisition parameters, US scanners, segmentation locations, and feature extraction platforms affected the reproducibility of ultrasomics features. Wavelet and shearlet features showed the best reproducibility across all procedures. KEY POINTS: • Different acquisition parameters, US scanners, segmentation locations, and feature extraction platforms affected the reproducibility of ultrasomics features. • A total of 1452 (27.6%) ultrasomics features were reproducible whenever intra-/inter-US machine or segmentation location were changed. • Wavelet and shearlet features showed the best reproducibility across all procedures.

Using new criteria to improve the differentiation between HCC and non-HCC malignancies: clinical practice and discussion in CEUS LI-RADS 2017.

PURPOSE: Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2017 and to explore potential ways to improve the efficacy. METHODS: A total of 315 nodules were classified as LR-1 to LR-5, LR-M, and LR-TIV. New criteria were applied by adjusting the early washout onset (< 45 s) and the time of marked washout (within 3 min). Two subgroups of the LR-M nodules were recategorized as LR-5, respectively. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: By adjusting early washout onset to < 45 s, the LR-5 as a standard for diagnosing HCC had an improved sensitivity (74.1% vs. 56.1%, P < 0.001) without significant change in PPV (93.3% vs. 96.1%, P = 0.267), but the specificity was decreased (48.3% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.018). The LR-M as a standard for the diagnosis of non-HCC malignancies had an increase in specificity (89.2% vs. 66.2%, P < 0.001) but a decrease in sensitivity (31.5% vs. 68.4%, P = 0.023). After reclassification according to the time of marked washout, the sensitivity of the LR-5 increased (80% vs. 56.1%, P < 0.001) without a change in PPV (94.9% vs. 96.1%, P = 0.626) and specificity (80% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.879). For reclassified LR-M nodules, the specificity increased (87.5% versus 66.2%, P < 0.001) with a non-significant decrease in sensitivity (47.3% vs. 68.4%, P = 0.189). CONCLUSIONS: The CEUS LI-RADS showed good confidence in diagnosing HCC while tended to misdiagnose HCC as non-HCC malignancies. Adjusting the marked washout time within 3 min would reduce the possibility of this misdiagnosis.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Differentiation Between Poorly Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of LR-5 for diagnosing poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (p-HCC). To build a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) signature for improving the differential diagnostic performance between p-HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: The B-mode ultrasound (BUS) and CEUS features of 60 p-HCCs and 56 ICCs were retrospectively analyzed. The CEUS LI-RADS category was assigned according to CEUS LI-RADS v2017. A diagnostic CEUS signature was built based on the independent significant features. An ultrasound (US) signature combining both BUS and CEUS features was also built. The diagnostic performances of the CEUS signature, US signature, and LR-5 were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: One (1.7%) p-HCC and 26 (46.4%) ICC patients presented cholangiectasis or cholangiolithiasis (P < .001). Fifty-four (90.0%) p-HCCs and 8 (14.3%) ICCs showed clear boundaries in the artery phase (P < .001). The washout times of p-HCCs and ICCs were 81.0 ± 42.5 s and 34.7 ± 8.6 s, respectively (P < .001). The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the CEUS signature, US signature, and LR-5 were 0.955, 91.67%, and 90.57% versus 0.976, 96.67%, and 92.45% versus 0.758, 51.67%, and 100%, respectively. The AUC and sensitivity of CEUS LI-RADS were much lower than those of the CEUS and US signatures (P < .001). CONCLUSION: LR-5 had high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosing p-HCC. When the washout time and tumor boundary were included in the CEUS signature, the sensitivity and AUC were remarkably increased in the differentiation between p-HCC and ICC.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based ultrasomics score: a potential biomarker for predicting early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to construct a prediction model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) ultrasomics features and investigate its efficacy in predicting early recurrence (ER) of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection or ablation. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 215 patients with primary HCC, who were divided into a developmental cohort (n = 139) and a test cohort (n = 76). Four representative images-grayscale ultrasound, arterial phase, portal venous phase and delayed phase-were extracted from each CEUS video. Ultrasomics features were extracted from tumoral and peritumoral area inside the region of interest. Logistic regression was used to establish models, including a tumoral model, a peritumoral model and a combined model with additional clinical risk factors. The performance of the three models in predicting recurrence within 2 years was verified. RESULTS: The combined model performed best in predicting recurrence within 2 years, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.845, while the tumoral model had an AUC of 0.810 and the peritumoral model one of 0.808. For prediction of recurrence-free survival, the 2-year cumulative recurrence rate was significant higher in the high-risk group (76.5%) than in the low-risk group (9.5%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These CEUS ultrasomics models, especially the combined model, had good efficacy in predicting early recurrence of HCC. The combined model has potential for individual survival assessment for HCC patients undergoing resection or ablation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CEUS ultrasomics had high sensitivity, specificity and PPV in diagnosing early recurrence of HCC, and high efficacy in predicting early recurrence of HCC (AUC > 0.8). The combined model performed better than the tumoral ultrasomics model and peritumoral ultrasomics model in predicting recurrence within 2 years. Recurrence was more likely to occur in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group, with 2-year cumulative recurrence rates, respectively, 76.5% and 9.5% (p < 0.0001).

RGB Three-Channel SWE-Based Ultrasomics Model: Improving the Efficiency in Differentiating Focal Liver Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To explore a new method for color image analysis of ultrasomics and investigate the efficiency in differentiating focal liver lesions (FLLs) by Red, Green, and Blue (RGB) three-channel SWE-based ultrasomics model. METHODS: One hundred thirty FLLs were randomly divided into training set (n = 65) and validation set (n = 65). The RGB three-channel and direct conversion methods were applied to the same color SWE images. Ultrasomics features were extracted from the preprocessing images establishing two feature data sets. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model was applied for feature selection and model construction. Two models, named RGB model (based on RGB three-channel conversion) and direct model (based on direct conversion), were used to differentiate FLLs. The diagnosis performance of the two models was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curves, and net reclassification index (NRI). RESULTS: In the validation cohort, the AUC of the direct model and RGB model in characterization on FLLs were 0.813 and 0.926, respectively (p = 0.038). Calibration curves and decision curves indicated that the RGB model had better calibration efficiency and provided greater clinical benefits. NRI revealed that the RGB model correctly reclassified 7% of malignant cases and 25% of benign cases compared to the direct model (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The RGB model generated by RGB three-channel method yielded better diagnostic efficiency than the direct model established by direct conversion method. The RGB three-channel method may be promising on ultrasomics analysis of color images in clinical application.

Tumor size-based validation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (CEUS LI-RADS) 2017 for hepatocellular carcinoma characterizing.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) and its major features in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of different sizes in high-risk patients. METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2015, a total of 545 untreated liver nodules were included. These liver nodules were divided into two groups (<20 mm and ≥20 mm). Each nodule was classified based on CEUS LI-RADS. The diagnostic performance comparison was assessed by the chi-square test, with pathology results as the golden criterion. RESULTS: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of CEUS LR-5 criteria in <20 mm group vs ≥20 mm group in diagnosing HCC were 60.5% vs 59.8%, 55.6% vs 57.6%, 85.7% vs 88.6 and 95.2% vs 98.5%, respectively, without significant difference (all p > 0.05). The accuracy, sensitivity and PPV of LR5/M for malignancy in <20 mm group were lower than in ≥20 mm group, with values of 79.1% vs 95.0%, 84.2% vs 95.7 and 91.4% vs 99.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The CEUS LI-RADS has a comparable performance for diagnosing HCC between lesions ≥ 20 mm and <20 mm. For diagnosing malignancy including HCC, it has a higher efficacy for lesions ≥ 20 mm than <20 mm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 1.For diagnosing HCC, CEUS LI-RADS has comparable performances between lesions ≥ 20 mm and <20 mm.2. For diagnosing malignancy including HCC, CEUS LI-RADS has a higher efficacy for lesions ≥ 20 mm than <20 mm.

Pathological considerations of CEUS LI-RADS: correlation with fibrosis stage and tumour histological grade.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of pathological factors, such as fibrosis stage and histological grade, on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 category of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2015 and December 2016, 441 consecutive patients at high risk of HCC with 460 pathologically proven HCCs were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a CEUS examination. The major features (arterial phase hyperenhancement, late and mild washout) were assessed, and LI-RADS categories were assigned according to CEUS LI-RADS v2017. CEUS LI-RADS categories and major features were compared in different histological grades and fibrosis stages. RESULTS: The CEUS LR-5 category was more frequently assigned in the low-grade group (151/280) than in the high-grade group (66/159) (p = 0.013), whereas the LR-TIV category was more frequently assigned in the high-grade group (36/159) than in the low-grade group (40/280) (p = 0.035). CEUS LI-RADS category was not significantly different among different fibrosis stages (p ≥ 0.05). Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and the hepatic fibrosis stage showed a significant correlation in HCCs ≥ 2 cm and the low-grade group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.003, respectively). No major features of CEUS LI-RADS showed statistically significant differences between the low- and high-grade groups (p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hepatic fibrosis stage can influence APHE but showed no impact on the CEUS LI-RADS classification, whereas the histological grade of HCC influenced the LR-5 and LR-TIV categories. KEY POINTS: • Histological grade influenced CEUS LR-5 and LR-TIV category (p = 0.013 and p = 0.035 respectively). Low-grade HCCs occurred more frequently in LR-5 category whereas high-grade HCCs occurred more frequently in LR-TIV category. • Fibrosis stage shows significant influence on APHE on HCCs of the size ≥ 2 cm and low-grade group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.003, respectively). • Hepatic fibrosis stage and HCC histological grade exhibited limited impact on CEUS LI-RADS. CEUS LI-RADS may be feasible for diagnosing HCC in patients regardless of histological grade and fibrosis stage.

Application of ultrasound-guided biopsy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in 2 cases with phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor and literature review.

Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a vanishingly rare paraneoplastic syndrome which is usually caused by phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMTs). The conventional treatment for PMTs is total resection, and ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can also be used for the treatment of PMTs patients, especially for patients in whom complete resection may lead to serious complications. We report two cases with PMT who presented syndrome with progressive musculoskeletal complaints and performed ultrasound-guided biopsy and RFA. Ultrasound-guided RFA, which is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment option, appears to be a valuable alternative to surgery for patients presenting with PMT. We are the first reported case of RFA guided by ultrasonography in the treatment of PMT.

Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative and Qualitative Elastography for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography for axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography (divided into quantitative and qualitative elastography) for ALNM in patients with breast cancer. Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies exploring the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography for ALNM in patients with breast cancer. The included studies were divided into quantitative and qualitative elastography groups to perform separate meta-analyses. The diagnostic performance was investigated with pooled sensitivity and specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Results: Seven and 11 studies were included in the quantitative and qualitative elastography meta-analyses, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity, DOR, and AUC with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were 0.82 (0.75, 0.87), 0.88 (0.78, 0.93), 33 (13, 83), and 0.89 (0.86, 0.91), respectively, for quantitative elastography and 0.81 (0.69, 0.89), 0.92 (0.79, 0.97), 46 (12, 181), and 0.92 (0.89, 0.94), respectively, for qualitative elastography. No significant publication bias existed. Fagan plots demonstrated good clinical utility. However, substantial heterogeneity existed among studies. Study design, measurement, and reference standard served as potential sources of heterogeneity for quantitative studies, which were measurement and reference standard for qualitative studies. Conclusions: Both quantitative and qualitative elastography seem to be feasible, non-invasive diagnostic tools for ALNM in breast cancer. Nevertheless, the results must be interpreted carefully, paying attention to heterogeneity issues, especially for quantitative elastography studies.