PREDICT prioritisation study: establishing the research priorities of paediatric emergency medicine physicians in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: The Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) performs multicentre research in Australia and New Zealand. Research priorities are difficult to determine, often relying on individual interests or prior work. OBJECTIVE: To identify the research priorities of paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) specialists working in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: Online surveys were administered in a two-stage, modified Delphi study. Eligible participants were PEM specialists (consultants and senior advanced trainees in PEM from 14 PREDICT sites). Participants submitted up to 3 of their most important research questions (survey 1). Responses were collated and refined, then a shortlist of refined questions was returned to participants for prioritisation (survey 2). A further prioritisation exercise was carried out at a PREDICT meeting using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation. This determined the priorities of active researchers in PEM including an emphasis on the feasibility of a research question. RESULTS: One hundred and six of 254 (42%) eligible participants responded to survey 1 and 142/245 (58%) to survey 2. One hundred and sixty-eight (66%) took part in either or both surveys. Two hundred forty-six individual research questions were submitted in survey 1. Survey 2 established a prioritised list of 35 research questions. Priority topics from both the Delphi and Hanlon process included high flow oxygenation in intubation, fluid volume resuscitation in sepsis, imaging in cervical spine injury, intravenous therapy for asthma and vasopressor use in sepsis. CONCLUSION: This prioritisation process has established a list of research questions, which will inform multicentre PEM research in Australia and New Zealand. It has also emphasised the importance of the translation of new knowledge.

Bystander basic life support: an important link in the chain of survival for children suffering a drowning or near-drowning episode.

Eight children suffered drowning or near-drowning in Sydney pools over an 11-day period in January 2007. Four received basic life support (BLS) within 5 minutes of immersion and survived with good functional neurological outcomes. The other four were not discovered for >or= 5 minutes and all died. This cluster serves as a reminder that timely effective bystander BLS is crucial to survival and good clinical outcomes in near-drowning episodes.

Femoral nerve block for femoral shaft fractures in a paediatric Emergency Department: can it be done better?

BACKGROUND: The relatively simple technique of administering a femoral nerve block is known to be quick, safe and effective in providing prolonged analgesia to children with femoral shaft fracture. Although medical literature supports its use in the emergency setting, no studies have been conducted on how this is undertaken in practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe the practice of femoral nerve block in previously well children who present to our Emergency Department with femoral shaft fracture. SETTING: This study was conducted at the Emergency Department of a tertiary paediatric hospital in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted by gathering data on all patients presenting to the Emergency Department between 1 January 1996 and 1 July 2001 with traumatic fracture to the femoral shaft. Whether femoral nerve block had been performed in the emergency setting; the time taken for femoral nerve block to be performed; the type of local anaesthetic used; the dose of local anaesthetic administered, and the level of training and area of expertise of doctors performing the femoral nerve block were determined from the clinical records. One-way analysis of variance and Student's t-tests were conducted to compare the average dosages of local anaesthetic used by the different medical sub-specialities involved. Student's t-tests were applied to analyse the time differences for performing femoral nerve block between emergency- and non-emergency-based medical staff. RESULTS: The majority (111) of the 117 patients who met the inclusion criteria for the study had isolated femoral shaft fractures (94.9%). Femoral nerve blocks were performed in 97 of our study patients (82.9%). No correlation was found between the age of the child and the time taken for a femoral nerve block. In 76 cases in which a femoral nerve block was given (64.9%), a member of staff external to the Emergency Department performed the procedure. The average time taken for a femoral nerve block to be performed for non-Emergency Department medical staff was significantly longer than for Emergency Department medical staff. In only 37 cases (31.9%), was a femoral nerve block administered within an hour of the time of triage. Doses used by non-anaesthetists were lower than those used by anaesthetists. CONCLUSION: There is unnecessary delay in carrying out this procedure for children with fractures to the femoral shaft. A significant degree of reliance on staff external to the Emergency Department was reported. This paper supports increased training and supervision to promote the more widespread and prompt use of femoral nerve blocks as an important standard of care for the Emergency Department.