Colonic diverticulosis as a risk factor for peritonitis in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of development of enteric peritonitis in Chinese peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with colonic diverticulosis is not known. There have been no reports on whether colonic diverticulosis may affect peritonitis outcomes. The objectives of this study were to examine whether colonic diverticulosis is a risk factor for the development of enteric peritonitis and to study its influence on the outcome of enteric peritonitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All continuous ambulatory PD patients that had barium enema and colonoscopic examinations performed between January 1994 and January 2006 were included. They were divided into 2 groups: patients with diverticulosis and patients without diverticulosis. Their demographic and clinical characteristics, colonic examination findings, and peritonitis data were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: 104 Chinese patients received 110 colonoscopies and 51 barium enema examinations. 25 patients (24.0%) had colonic diverticulosis. Patients with diverticulosis were older (65.4 +/- 14.7 vs 58.4 +/- 14.0 years, p = 0.033). The most common site of involvement of diverticulosis was the ascending colon (56%). 128 episodes of enteric peritonitis were recorded in 49 patients. Compared with patients without enteric peritonitis, more patients in the enteric peritonitis group had diverticulosis (38.8% vs 10.9%, p = 0.001) and diverticulosis most often involved the ascending colon (20.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.082). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of diverticulosis (hazard ratio 5.17, 95% confidence interval 1.86 - 14.40; p = 0.002) and diverticulosis involving the ascending colon (hazard ratio 6.89, 95% confidence interval 1.43 - 33.32, p = 0.016) were independent risk factors for the development of enteric peritonitis. Enteric peritonitis in patients with diverticulosis had a higher but nonsignificant treatment failure rate (26.9% vs 18.4%, p = 0.282). CONCLUSION: In this selected cohort of PD patients with indications of colonic examinations, diverticulosis, especially involving the ascending colon, may be a risk factor for the development of enteric peritonitis. Colonic diverticulosis does not appear to affect the outcome of enteric peritonitis. Further studies are warranted to determine ways to prevent enteric peritonitis in PD patients with diverticulosis.

A prospective randomized study comparing tenckhoff catheters inserted using the triple incision method with standard swan neck catheters.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The downward directed exit of the swan neck catheter may decrease the risk of exit-site infection (ESI). The percentage of migrations of the swan neck catheter seems to be less than the conventional Tenckhoff catheter and the swan neck catheter is more expensive and cannot be manipulated by guidewire technique if tip migration occurs. In this study, the conventional Tenckhoff catheter was used. The straight tunnel was converted to an arcuate one using the triple incision method, resulting in a downward directed exit. The arcuate tunnel was created by passing the catheter through an additional incision located between the paramedian incision and the exit site. We compared the infective and mechanical complications of the Tenckhoff catheter with a downward exit, implanted using the triple incision method, with the swan neck catheter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 101 new peritoneal dialysis patients were prospectively randomized to receive either the Tenckhoff catheter with a downward exit, implanted using the triple incision method, or the swan neck catheter. Each patient was followed up for 24 months. 50 patients were in the triple incision method group (TIMG) and 51 were in the swan neck catheter group (SNCG). RESULTS: Over a mean period of 18.9 +/- 8.0 months of follow-up, ESI occurred in 35 patients (70%) in TIMG and 37 patients (72.5%) in SNCG (p = 0.83). The ESI rates were 0.71 and 1.0 episodes/catheter-year in TIMG and SNCG respectively (p = 0.21). The peritonitis rates were similar in the 2 groups (0.64 episodes/year in TIMG and 0.68 episodes/year in SNCG, p = 0.47). More patients in TIMG had tip migration [15 patients (30%) in TIMG vs 10 patients (19.6%) in SNCG] but the difference was not statistically significant. Repositioning of the catheter by guidewire manipulation was successful in patients in TIMG but not in SNCG. Overall catheter survival at 12 and 24 months was 95% and 83% in TIMG and 93% and 79% in SNCG respectively (p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: By using the conventional Tenckhoff catheter with a downward exit created using the triple incision method, high catheter survival rates with infective and mechanical complication rates similar to those of the swan neck catheter can be achieved. The triple incision method has the additional advantages of lower cost and the catheter can be manipulated by guidewire technique if tip migration occurs.

Risks and outcomes of peritonitis after flexible colonoscopy in CAPD patients.

OBJECTIVE: The ISPD 2005 guidelines for peritonitis recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy while on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) but there is little literature to support this recommendation. This study aimed to look into the risks and outcomes of peritonitis after colonoscopy in CAPD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All records of flexible colonoscopy performed on our CAPD patients from January 1994 to January 2006 were retrieved. Demographic and clinical data, use of antibiotics before colonoscopy, endoscopic findings, procedure performed, and peritonitis data were analyzed. RESULTS: 77 CAPD patients underwent 97 colonoscopies. No peritonitis developed in the 18 cases where antibiotics were given before colonoscopy. Among those without antibiotic prophylaxis, 4 episodes of peritonitis occurred within 24 hours after the procedure and 1 occurred 5 days later. All responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. Colonic biopsy and polypectomy were not associated with more peritonitis (2 in 41 with biopsy vs 3 in 38 without biopsy, p = 0.67; 1 in 30 with polypectomy vs 4 in 49 without polypectomy, p = 0.64). CONCLUSION: The risk of peritonitis after colonoscopy without antibiotic prophylaxis was 6.3%. All peritonitis episodes responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. Colonic biopsy or polypectomy did not appear to increase the risk of peritonitis. Although statistically not significant when compared with patients without antibiotic prophylaxis, we observed no peritonitis after colonoscopy in patients that were given antibiotics for prophylactic purposes or for other reasons. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics would be better defined by large randomized trials.

Cefazolin plus netilmicin versus cefazolin plus ceftazidime for treating CAPD peritonitis: effect on residual renal function.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) treatment guidelines for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) peritonitis 2000 recommended the use of cefazolin plus ceftazidime as the initial empirical therapy in patients with residual renal function (RRF). However, this treatment regimen has not been compared with the conventional regimen of cefazolin plus netilmicin in prospective, randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Stable CAPD patients who developed clinical evidence of peritonitis were randomized to receive intraperitoneal (i.p.) cefazolin plus netilmicin or cefazolin plus ceftazidime once daily in the long dwell for 14 days. For patients with RRF (>1 mL/minute) before entry into the study (N= 50), RRF and 24-hour urine volume were measured at days 1, 14, and 42 after commencement of i.p. antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were recruited into the study. The primary cure rates of i.p. cefazolin plus netilmicin and cefazolin plus ceftazidime were 66.7% and 64.7%, respectively. The overall cure rate for the 2 treatment regimens was 82.3% for both. Seven patients (14%) from each treatment group required removal of the dialysis catheters due to treatment failure. Relapse of peritonitis occurred in 2 patients (4%) in both treatment groups. Thirty-six patients with RRF at baseline achieved primary cure of their peritonitis by the assigned antibiotics. In this subgroup of patients, their RRF and daily urine volume showed significant reduction at day 14 and returned to near baseline values at day 42. The degree of reduction in RRF and urine volume did not differ significantly between the patients treated with cefazolin plus netilmicin and cefazolin plus ceftazidime. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal cefazolin plus netilmicin and cefazolin plus ceftazidime have similar efficacy as empirical treatment for CAPD peritonitis. In CAPD patients with RRF, significant but reversible reduction in RRF and 24-hour urine volume could occur after an episode of peritonitis, despite successful treatment by i.p. antibiotics. The effect of i.p. cefazolin plus netilmicin, or i.p. cefazolin plus ceftazidime on RRF in CAPD patients with peritonitis does not appear to be different. Our findings do not support the routine use of cefazolin and ceftazidime as the empirical treatment for CAPD peritonitis.

A prospective randomized study on three different peritoneal dialysis catheters.

OBJECTIVE: We compared outcomes for catheters with different configurations: conventional straight, swan-neck straight tip, and swan-neck curled tip. DESIGN: The study was conducted as a prospective randomized controlled trial in the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) unit of a university center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomized 93 new regular CAPD patients without prior peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion to receive a conventional straight, double-cuffed catheter (CS), a swan-neck straight catheter (SNC), or a swan-neck curled tip catheter (SNC) in 2:1:1 ratio. RESULTS: The exit-site infection (ESI) rate was slightly lower with swan-neck catheters as compared with straight catheters, but the difference was not statistically significant. The peritonitis rate and overall catheter survival were similar. In Staphylococcus aureus nasal non carriers as compared with carriers, ESI-free catheter survival was significantly better with swan-neck catheters (p = 0.0302 and p = 0.82 respectively). As compared with SC catheters, SNC catheters had a significantly higher migration rate (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Swan-neck catheters were associated with a slightly better ESI rate, but SNC catheters are not routinely recommended because of a high migration rate. The SNS catheter is therefore recommended as the first-line catheter of choice, particularly in populations with a low rate of S. aureus nasal carriage.

Screening by trained nurses for peripheral vascular disease in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients with and without diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: We studied the effectiveness of a screening program for peripheral vascular disease (PVD) carried out by trained renal nurses in patients with and without diabetes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 30 stable diabetic and 30 stable non diabetic CAPD patients into this cross-sectional study. Trained renal nurses measured the patients' ankle-to-brachial systolic pressure index (ABI) using a Doppler ultrasound machine and their foot vibration perception (VPT) using a biothesiometer, and administered a questionnaire on foot symptoms. An ABI < 1.0 was regarded as abnormal and suggestive of the presence of PVD. An ABI < 0.7 or > 1.3 was regarded as severely abnormal. Findings for VPT were classified as normal or abnormal. Patients were then followed for 1 year for any overt development of clinical PVD, leg complications, and other vascular complications and for clinical outcome. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63 +/- 9 years, and the ratio of men to women was 1:1.3. An abnormal ABI was seen in 22 patients (37%). The questionnaire detected clinical PVD symptoms in 3 patients. Abnormal ABI and VPT findings were more frequent in diabetic patients. After 12 months of follow-up, patients with an abnormal ABI (and particularly those with a severely abnormal ABI) were more likely to develop leg complications and any type of cardiovascular disease than were patients with a normal ABI. Foot vibration perception had no predictive value on subsequent development of leg complications. When risk factors including age, ABI, and VPT were analyzed by logistic regression, only ABI was a significant independent predictor of subsequent lower-limb vascular complications [odds ratio (OR): 21.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.35 to 187.0; p = 0.00064]. The OR for moderately abnormal ABI was 13.0 (95% CI: 1.015 to 166.3); for severely abnormal ABI, it was 27.4 (95% CI: 2.35 to 187.0, p = 0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of ABI by Doppler ultrasound is a useful and effective screening test for PVD in CAPD patients. In this study, VPT was not shown to be predicative of future leg complications, indicating that peripheral neuropathy plays a less important role in the development of such complications. Our results proved that trained renal nurses can play an active role in detecting foot problems in renal patients by ABI measurement.