ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To compare the quality of life outcome between nurse-led and non-nurse-led interventions for patients with cancer using a meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed by searching randomized controlled trials about nurse-led interventions in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2017. Pooled summary estimates for quality of life outcome was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) either on a fixed- or random-effect model via Stata 13.0 software. RESULTS: Seven literatures involving 1110 patients (554 in the nurse-led group and 556 in the control group) were included. Pooled analysis showed there were no differences in the global quality of life, cognitive, emotional, role, social and physical functions, appetite loss, diarrhea, and dyspnea scales of Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 version 3.0 core (QLQ-C30) questionnaires between the nurse-led and control groups. However, the nurse-led management program significantly decreased the occurrence of constipation (SMDâ=â-0.36, 95% CIâ=â-0.71 to -0.00; Pâ=â.001) and insomnia (SMDâ=â-0.33, 95% CIâ=â-0.99 to 0.32; Pâ=â.011) and reduced the financial difficulty (SMDâ=â-0.34, 95% CIâ=â-0.65 to -0.03; Pâ=â.033) for patients with cancer. CONCLUSION: The nurse-led disease management strategy seemed to be effective to improve constipation, insomnia, and financial impacts for patients with cancer in quality of life assessment.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/nursing , Patient Outcome Assessment , Practice Patterns, Nurses' , Quality of Life , Disease Management , HumansABSTRACT
Increasing evidence indicates that the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in myocardium correlates with the severity of cardiac dysfunction in septic shock. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) on the expression of TNF-α in myocardium in septic shock pigs. Sixteen male Landrace pigs weighing 31 ± 5 kg were randomly assigned to control group (n = 4), septic shock group (n = 6), and HVHF group (septic shock + HVHF, n = 6). All animals were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. After baseline examinations, septic shock group and HVHF group underwent induction of peritonitis. One hour later, the animals in HVHF group received treatment with HVHF and the treatment was continued for 12 h. As the control of HVHF group, the animals in septic shock group received the same support but hemofiltration. Twelve hours after HVHF therapy, all the animals were sacrificed. TNF-α and nitric oxide (NO) levels in both circulation and myocardium were measured. Compared with those of septic shock animals, the levels of cardiac output, stroke volume, and mean arterial pressure were better maintained in HVHF group. The expression of TNF-α in myocardium in HVHF group was lower than that in septic shock group (44.17 ± 18.70 vs. 92.50 ± 33.89 pg/mg protein, P = 0.015). The difference of TNF-α in circulation between HVHF group and septic shock group was no significance at different time. However, circulating NO in HVHF group was lower than that in septic shock group. These results suggest that HVHF improves hemodynamics and heart dysfunction in septic shock pigs, which may be attributed to reduction of TNF-α in myocardium but not in circulation.
Subject(s)
Hemofiltration , Myocardium/immunology , Shock, Septic/therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , Animals , Arterial Pressure , Disease Models, Animal , Down-Regulation , Male , Nitric Oxide/metabolism , Shock, Septic/blood , Shock, Septic/immunology , Shock, Septic/physiopathology , Stroke Volume , Swine , Time Factors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/bloodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term and long-term safety of using single-dose escalation of recombinant humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3) in kidney transplantation recipients. METHODS: A total of 29 recipients of cadaveric kidney transplant from June 2008 to December 2008 were sequently assigned to receive single-dose intravenous injection of OKT3 with different doses of 2.5 mg (n = 9), 5.0 mg (n = 10) and 10.0 mg (n = 10) at Days 7 - 14 post-operation. Meanwhile, a control group was established by selecting kidney transplant recipients, who did not participate in the trial in the same period. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. During this period, liver function, kidney function, hemoglobin and other biochemical indicators were monitored and adverse events recorded over time. RESULTS: No obvious first dose effect was observed, except low heat (7/29), chills (4/29), mild liver damage (2/29), upper respiratory tract infection and headache (1/29) across all doses. Other adverse reactions were mild, unrelated with doses. The 2-year patients/grafts survival rates of treatment group and control group were 100%/100%, and 100%/97%, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection confirmed by renal biopsy was 6.9% (2/29) and 10.0% (3/30) in treatment group and control group, respectively. The incidence of lung infection was 10.3% (3/29) and 13.3% (4/30), respectively. The values of serum creatinine at 1 week and 3, 6, 12, 24 months showed no statistically significance in two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is safe to use single-shot OKT3 intravenously in kidney transplant recipients. The recombinant humanized OKT3 may be an effective immunosuppressive agent with milder toxicity for solid organ transplantation.
