Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 59(11): 982-991, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33821724

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to the latest medical evidence, Methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone (Suboxone®) are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). While the evidence basis for the use of these medications is favorable, less is known about the perceptions of the general public about them. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use Twitter to assess the public perceptions about methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone, and to compare their discussion contents based on themes/topics, subthemes, and sentiment. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive analysis of a small and automatic analysis of a large volume of microposts ("tweets") that mentioned "methadone" or "suboxone". In the manual analysis, we categorized the tweets into themes and subthemes, as well as by sentiment and personal experience, and compared the information posted about these two medications. We performed automatic topic modeling and sentiment analysis over large volumes of posts and compared the outputs to those from the manual analyses. RESULTS: We manually analyzed 900 tweets, most of which related to access (15.3% for methadone; 14.3% for buprenorphine-naloxone), stigma (17.0%; 15.5%), and OUD treatment (12.8%; 15.6%). Only a small proportion of tweets (16.4% for Suboxone® and 9.3% for methadone) expressed positive sentiments about the medications, with few tweets describing personal experiences. Tweets mentioning both medications primarily discussed MOUD broadly, rather than comparing the two medications directly. Automatic topic modeling revealed topics from the larger dataset that corresponded closely to the manually identified themes, but sentiment analysis did not reveal any notable differences in chatter regarding the two medications. CONCLUSIONS: Twitter content about methadone and Suboxone® is similar, with the same major themes and similar sub-themes. Despite the proven effectiveness of these medications, there was little dialogue related to their benefits or efficacy in the treatment of OUD. Perceptions of these medications may contribute to their underutilization in combatting OUDs.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Methadone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Public Opinion , Social Media , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination/adverse effects , Humans , Methadone/adverse effects , Narcotic Antagonists/adverse effects , Natural Language Processing , Opiate Substitution Treatment/adverse effects
2.
J Med Toxicol ; 16(3): 262-268, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31898154

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The height of the opioid epidemic in the USA has led to an increasing call for access to medication assisted treatment for opioid use disorder, including buprenorphine initiation from the emergency department (ED). However, only a small percentage of emergency physicians feel prepared or have the necessary training to prescribe buprenorphine. Twitter has increasingly been used as a tool for medical education, and there is growing interest in using this forum to actively engage medical providers and the public. This study examined the views regarding ED initiation of buprenorphine treatment among contributors to the quarterly American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) tweetchat, #firesidetox, and the demographics of the participants. METHODS: A mixed methods descriptive study was conducted to analyze individual responses and self-identified demographics among Twitter users participating in the #firesidetox tweetchat regarding the ACMT position statement about ED initiation of buprenorphine treatment. RESULTS: This tweetchat included 86 participants, the majority of whom were clinicians in the USA. Physicians accounted for 46% of participants primarily emergency medicine physician toxicologists and authored 75% of the tweets. It consisted of 317 tweets which most frequently described clinical vignettes or experience (46%) or medical education (25%) related to buprenorphine and had themes related to treatment initiation location (ED vs outpatient vs home) (8.6%) and challenges and solutions to buprenorphine administration (8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: A tweetchat can be used to disseminate and discuss the adoption of buprenorphine in the ED. Importantly, the tweetchat provides a forum for experts to share narratives and expertise on implementation and barriers and successes in operationalizing buprenorphine administration in emergency departments.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid Epidemic , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Social Media , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Buprenorphine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Information Dissemination , Male , Opiate Substitution Treatment/adverse effects , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Scholarly Communication , Treatment Outcome
3.
Curr Diab Rep ; 19(10): 106, 2019 09 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31529405

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetic macular edema (DME) and complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are the primary causes of vision loss in patients with diabetic retinopathy. As the incidence of diabetes increases worldwide, new, cost-effective treatments for DME and PDR will become paramount. Currently, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications are considered first-line treatment. However, multiple visits for injections and the economic and time burden they entail make this treatment modality less than ideal. Early vitrectomy as well as depot delivery systems for medications could potentially reduce the treatment burden of patients with diabetes, prevent visual loss, and provide long-term stabilization of retinopathy in patients with diabetes. Newer port delivery systems for anti-VEGF medications could one day make this treatment modality better suited for patients across the globe. RECENT FINDINGS: Real-world data shows poor compliance with treatment among patients with diabetes. Recent publications show catastrophic results when anti-VEGF treatments are stopped abruptly. The port delivery system for ranibizumab shows maintenance of adequate anti-VEGF levels in the vitreous cavity for many months. Early vitrectomy can provide cost-effective long-term stabilization in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. Microincisional vitrectomy as a treatment for DME and PDR remains controversial and larger trials are needed to definitively prove its superiority over other modalities; however, small-scale data point towards its usefulness in specific populations. Newer port delivery systems of anti-VEGF show promise in decreasing the number of office visits in patients with diabetic retinopathy.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/surgery , Macular Edema/surgery , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Humans , Inventions , Laser Coagulation , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Vitrectomy
4.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res ; 12(1): 93-97, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28299011

ABSTRACT

Giant retinal tears (GRTs) are full-thickness circumferential tears of more than 90 degrees of the retina that are associated with vitreous detachment. They are related to ocular trauma, high myopia, aphakia, pseudophakia, genetic mutations involving collagen and young age. GRTs comprise 1.5% of all rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and the average age of incidence is 42 years. GRTs are more common in males, as 72% of all cases occur in males. The incidence of GRTs in the general population is estimated to be 0.05 per 100,000 individuals. Common techniques used in the management of GRTs include fluid-air exchange, pneumatic retinopexy, scleral buckling, primary vitrectomy with gas or silicone oil tamponade, and combined scleral buckle-vitrectomies. However, management of GRTs poses a great challenge to physicians due to the high risk of intra- and post-operative complications and the many technical difficulties involved. The advent of perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCL) and the use of micro-incisional surgery for the treatment of GRTs has provided new opportunities for the management of GTRs. Today, retinal reattachment can be achieved in 94-100% of cases.

5.
Optom Vis Sci ; 93(9): 1181-6, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27309526

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Terson's syndrome is a condition where a preretinal hemorrhage forms as a result of increased intracranial pressure. The elevated intracranial pressure is thought to be transmitted through the veins and the optic nerve sheath to the optic disc and retina, causing the thin capillary walls to rupture. The authors present a unique case of Terson's syndrome in a patient who underwent recent surgical management for cerebellar hemangioblastomas related to von Hippel-Lindau disease. CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old African American female patient with a history of von Hippel-Lindau disease presented with pain in her right eye. She had recently undergone surgery to remove cerebellar hemangioblastomas. Preliminary fundus imaging was performed, but before formal ophthalmic testing could be conducted, the patient seized and was taken directly to the emergency room. When the patient returned for a formal evaluation 3 weeks later, a new preretinal "boat-shaped" hemorrhage was now present. Additionally, reports from the emergency room suggested that she had bled into the cavity where the previous cerebellar resection had taken place. This hemorrhage likely led to an increase in intracranial pressure, causing a Terson's-like event. CONCLUSIONS: A Terson's event may be caused by high intracranial pressure secondary to the surgical removal of von Hippel-Lindau syndrome-associated cerebellar tumors and should be included as a possible complication of surgical management.


Subject(s)
Retinal Hemorrhage/etiology , von Hippel-Lindau Disease/complications , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Retinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Syndrome , von Hippel-Lindau Disease/physiopathology
6.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 100(4): 478-83, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26294101

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the functional and anatomic outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with juxtapapillary laser photocoagulation (JLP) versus vitrectomy without JLP in optic disc pit maculopathy. METHODS: This was a multicentre, retrospective study of 46 consecutive patients with optic disc pit maculopathy presenting at tertiary eye centres between 1992 and 2012. Indications for surgery included distorted or decreased vision. Surgical intervention included PPV, posterior vitreous detachment, with or without gas tamponade. Twenty-four patients received laser photocoagulation at the temporal edge of the optic disc pit (group A) and 22 patients had no laser (group B). Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography findings were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 44 months (range 12-98 months). BCVA in group A improved significantly from 0.7 logMAR (20/100) preoperatively to 0.5 logMAR (20/60) postoperatively (p=0.017). In group B, BCVA improved from 0.7 logMAR (20/100) preoperatively to 0.4 logMAR (20/40) postoperatively (p=0.014). The difference in final BCVA between groups was not statistically significant (p=0.693). The mean central macular thickness (CMT) in group A improved significantly from 750 µm preoperatively to 309 µm at last follow-up (p<0.0001). The mean CMT in group B improved from 616 µm preoperatively to 291 µm at last follow-up (p=0.028). The difference in final CMT between groups was not statistically significant (p=0.747). CONCLUSIONS: PPV with JLP for optic disc pit maculopathy had similar functional and anatomic outcomes compared with vitrectomy without JLP.


Subject(s)
Eye Abnormalities/surgery , Laser Coagulation , Optic Disk/abnormalities , Retinal Diseases/surgery , Vitrectomy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Eye Abnormalities/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intraoperative Complications , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retinal Diseases/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Subretinal Fluid , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Visual Acuity
7.
Retina ; 35(12): 2489-97, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26110597

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes from the largest case series of choroidal neovascularization secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 46 eyes of 43 consecutive subjects. Collected data included demographic details, history of presenting illness, clinical examination details including visual acuity at presentation and follow-up with imaging and treatment details. Main outcome measures were the proportion of eyes that had improved (3 or more lines), stable (within ±1 line), or decreased (3 or more lines) vision at the final visit as compared with baseline examination. Secondary efficacy outcomes included change in visual acuity at final follow-up, number of injections, treatment-free interval, and adverse events. RESULTS: Mean age was 57.56 years (range 29-79 years). Mean follow-up duration was 38.3 months ± 58.9 months. More than 3 lines of improvement in 12 eyes (26%), vision was stable (within ±1 line) in 19 eyes (41.3%), and >3 lines of loss was noted in 6 eyes (13%). Mean change in the number of lines was 1.16 ± 3.74. Mean number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections during the follow-up was 4.45 ± 4.1. The longest treatment-free interval was 8.9 months ± 7.5 months. There were no adverse events noted. CONCLUSION: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy as a primary therapy for choroidal neovascularization secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy is safe and efficacious, without any serious adverse events.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/complications , Choroidal Neovascularization/drug therapy , Ranibizumab/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/drug therapy , Choroidal Neovascularization/etiology , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Visual Acuity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...