ABSTRACT
Objectives: Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score is a common prognostication tool in peritoneal metastases (PM). We hypothesize that the distribution of PCI score and involvement of specific regions affects survival and morbidity outcomes. Methods: Data was collected from a prospective database of patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PM at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. We evaluate the relationship between PCI, PCI distribution, and survival and morbidity outcomes. Results: One hundred and fifty-two patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with a median PCI score of nine (range 0-31). Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 43 and 17 months, respectively. Region six (pelvis) was most commonly involved and had the highest frequency of heavy disease burden. Presence of PM in the lower abdomen, flanks, and small bowel were associated with poorer OS (p=0.01, 0.03, <0.001) and PFS (p=0.04, 0.02, <0.001). Involvement of porta hepatitis predicted poorer OS but not PFS (p=0.03). Involvement of the gastric antrum resulted in higher rates of postoperative complications. Conclusions: The pattern of PCI distribution may be associated with varying survival and morbidity outcomes.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The Emergency Surgery and Trauma (ESAT) team is a dedicated consultant-led service to streamline the emergency surgical workload in Singapore. As acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical conditions, we aim to compare outcomes of patients with appendicitis in the ESAT model as compared to the traditional on-call model. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients admitted to Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, with acute appendicitis between two periods: May-October 2014 (6 months pre-ESAT) versus January-June 2017 (post-ESAT). Patient demographics, operative details, efficiency, clinical outcomes, and hospital bill savings were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 192 patients in the pre-ESAT period and 179 patients in the post-ESAT period. Patient demographics and comorbidities were comparable (P > 0.05). Time from emergency department referral to surgical review was significantly reduced in the ESAT period: 77.8 ± 46.9 min versus 127 ± 102 in the pre-ESAT period (P = 0.002). Time from case booking to operating theatre was significantly shorter in the ESAT period: 72.4 ± 55.2 min compared to 157.3 ± 209.1 (P < 0.01). More cases were carried out in the daytime during the ESAT period, 50.2% versus 39.1% (P = 0.029). The majority underwent laparoscopic appendectomy 156/179 (87.2%) in the ESAT period, with fewer open appendectomies 3/179 (1.7%) as compared to the pre-ESAT period (P = 0.062). There were higher intraoperative consultant supervision rates during the ESAT period, 38/166 (22.9%) as compared to 12/166 (6.7%) in the pre-ESAT period (P = 0.001). There were fewer complications (Clavien-Dindo grade II and above) in the ESAT period, 1 (0.6%) as compared to 6 (3.4%) pre-ESAT (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: The ESAT service is associated with better efficiency outcomes for patients with acute appendicitis.
