Modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy with a single burr hole in the alternative sphenoid ridge keyhole.

BACKGROUND: One-piece modified orbitozygomatic approach (OZA) is an extended version of the pterional approach that also includes orbital walls and frontal process of the zygomatic bone. For this craniotomy one burr hole must be placed in MacCarty keyhole and another - in the temporal region. OBJECTIVE: To develop a technique of the one-piece modified OZA with single a burr hole in the alternative sphenoid ridge keyhole that allows access to orbit, anterior cranial fossa and middle cranial fossa and apply it intraoperatively. METHODS: A single human head specimen was used. The dissection was performed using standard surgical instruments high-speed Stryker drill. Every stage of the approach was photographed. We also report a surgical case of a patient with orbital cavernous hemangioma that was resected using the described technique. RESULTS: The technique of the one-piece modified OZA with a single burr hole in the alternative sphenoid ridge keyhole is described, and its advantages and limitations are analyzed. The technique is used to totally resect an orbital cavernous hemangioma with good functional and cosmetic result. CONCLUSION: Modified OZA with a single burr hole in the sphenoid ridge keyhole is possible and may be an alternative to the classic technique. The advantages of this variation are the placement of just one burr hole and the preservation of a larger portion of the orbital roof. The latter facilitates better bone reconstruction and better cosmetic outcome. Disadvantages are the difficulty of identifying the location of the sphenoid ridge keyhole and risk of damaging the dura.

Assessing the reliability of zygomatic bone landmarks as guides to reach the inferior orbital fissure in orbitozygomatic osteotomy: anatomical study of 83 human skulls.

To perform an adequate orbitozygomatic craniotomy, it is very important that the bone cut which passes through the body of the zygoma reaches the inferior orbital fissure (IOF). To reach the IOF, two surface landmarks on the body of the zygoma are described: a point located directly superior to the malar eminence and the zygomaticofacial foramen. The article explores the reliability of these landmarks and three other alternative points to reach the IOF. Eighty-three adult skulls were used in this study. The IOF dimensions and the relationship with the malar eminence, the point superior to the malar eminence, the zygomaticofacial foramen, and 3 alternative points (E, C, F) were analyzed. The malar eminence was unacceptable for use as a guide to the IOF. The point superior to the malar eminence was also unacceptable as a guide as only 9.4% and 10.9% were in the projection of the IOF on the right and left, respectively. 59.7% of the total zygomaticofacial foramina fell in the IOF projection. The point F fell in the projection of the IOF in 98.8% and 100.0% on the right and left, respectively. The use of the malar eminence as a guide to reach the IOF is unreliable in one third of cases as it is not easily identified intraoperatively in these cases. The zygomaticofacial foramen cannot be considered a reliable surgical landmark to reach the IOF. The authors recommend using a novel landmark which may be identified as a midpoint between intersections of the anterior and posterior margins of the zygomatic frontal process on a line extending from the inferior margin of the zygomatic arc. This point is reliable in 98.8-100% of cases.