High sensitivity and specificity rates of cobas® HPV test as a primary screening test for cervical intraepithelial lesions in a real-world setting.

Cervical carcinoma (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy among women. Screening with Papanicolau smear is linked to a reduction in CC incidence rates when screening programs have been developed. However, this technique has several limitations, including moderate sensitivity rates for detection of cervical preneoplastic HPV-related lesions. In this real-world study, we proposed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity rates of cobas® test, which amplifies target DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction and hybridization of nucleic acids for the detection of 14 HR-HPV types in a single analysis) used as primary screening test for CC and preneoplastic lesions in women aged 25-65 years in a large University Hospital in Buenos Aires. A total of 1044 patients were included in the sample (median age: 46 years); sensitivity and specificity rates for the HR-HPV test used as primary screening test were 98.66% (95% confidence interval [95CI]: 97.67-99.3%) and 87.15% (95CI: 84.93-89.15%), respectively. The positive predictive value was 88.47% (95CI: 86.54%-90.42%) and the negative predictive value was 98.48% (95CI: 97.75%-99.23%). The cobas® HR-HPV testing was highly sensitive and specific for the detection of CC and preneoplastic lesions in real practice.

The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease Vaginal Wet Mount Microscopy Guidelines: How to Perform, Applications, and Interpretation.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to assess the available literature concerning the indications, performance, technique, and classification of wet mount microscopy (WMM) and to establish evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: Literature review from the main scientific databases was performed by the ad hoc "Vaginitis and Microbiome Committee" of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease. The document was approved by the executive council and membership of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease. RESULTS: Available data are limited and usually of low level of evidence. Nevertheless, it shows that WMM is capable of reducing misdiagnosis, overtreatment, and undertreatment of vaginal conditions. It has an excellent performance for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and variable performance for trichomoniasis and candidiasis. It is the gold standard for aerobic vaginitis/desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. Currently, there is no recommendation to use WMM in the screening of asymptomatic women.The use of phase contrast is recommended to improve performance and reproducibility. Sampling location, devices, and technique have an impact on the results.Available scoring and classification scores have significant limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Wet mount microscopy is a point-of-care, inexpensive, and fast technique that, with practice, can be mastered by office clinicians. It should be considered a basic skill in the curricula of gynecology and obstetrics residencies. Recommendations are provided on sampling, reading, and scoring.

The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease Surgical Oncological Procedure Definitions Committee "Surgical Terminology for Vulvar Cancer Treatment".

OBJECTIVES: The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) Surgical Oncological Procedure Definitions Committee propose a consistent terminology based on well-defined and reproducible anatomic landmarks that can be used by all who are involved in care of patients with vulvar conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The fundamental principles behind the new terminology contained descriptions of the area extension and depth of the surgical procedure. RESULTS: Vulvar Surgical Topographic Anatomy LandmarksExtension. The internal border of the vulva is the hymenal ring. The genitocrural folds are the external lateral borders.The vertical line through the clitoris and the anus defines lateral portions of the vulva.The horizontal line from the upper border of the hymenal ring defines anterior and posterior portion of the vulva.Depth. The floor of the vulva is represented by the median perineal fascia or perineal membrane of the urogenital diaphragm.A. Vulvectomy1. Extension: partial/total vulvectomy. Removal of part/entire vulvar/perineal integument independent of the depth.2. Depth: superficial/deep. Removal of the most superficial layer/removal of the vulvar tissue to the superficial aponeurosis of the urogenital diaphragm and/or pubic periosteum.B. Inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy1. Superficial inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Removal of the nodes located beside the inguinal ligament and along the great saphenous vein.2. Deep femoral lymphadenectomy. Removal of the nodes below the cribriform lamina and medial to the femoral vein. CONCLUSIONS: This terminology helps avoid confusion and promote better understanding and exchange of experiences among gynecologic oncologists involved in vulvar carcinoma care.