Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Behav Genet ; 31(1): 125-39, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11529269

ABSTRACT

A previous paper assessed a "Molecular Mapping of Twenty-Four Features of Down Syndrome on Chromosome 21" (Delabar et al., 1993), by analyzing the genotypes/phenotypes of patients suffering from partial trisomy. The mapping was defined through implications--each feature was mapped to the conjunction of cytogenetic bands that were shared by all patients having that feature. In the present paper, we extend that approach to determine how far those implications depart from defining equivalences. Finding equivalences is important. Local equivalences permit a genetic characterization of a feature. And if global equivalences held for all features, that set of bands would be sufficient to characterize the various phenotypes observed in individuals with partial trisomy 21. To extend the earlier approach, we examine the structure of equivalences as well as the structure of implications. We examine both conjunctions of bands and conjunctions of features. The use of Galois lattices permits simultaneous evaluation of both kinds of structures. Each Galois lattice is labeled with a basis (minimal generating set) of implications going from conjunctions of features into bands and those going from conjunctions of bands into features. Analysis reveals that about half of the conjunctions of bands that characterize the genetic structure embody equivalences. This allows us to improve the genetic description of features and to specify minimal sets of questions that need to be investigated to make the global genetic description more precise.


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/genetics , Genotype , Models, Genetic , Phenotype , Chromosome Banding , Chromosome Mapping , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21 , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Humans
2.
Behav Genet ; 30(5): 367-73, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11235982

ABSTRACT

Phenotypic differences among mice with disrupted genes and those with wild-type alleles have not provided the necessary evidence for desired gene/phenotype correlations. These differences could be due to "passenger genes" from the donor 129 strains that are used to produce stem cells. Three variations of attack behavior were measured, using mice carrying a disruption of the neural nitric oxide synthase gene. In the first population, the disrupted gene had been maintained on a mixed background including C57BL/6J and 129 alleles. We have developed a second population in which the disrupted gene was transferred onto a C57BL/6J background during five backcross generations. On the mixed C57BL/6J-129 background, mice homozygous for disrupted Nos1 alleles attacked more frequently, had shorter attack latencies, and presented a greater number of attacks than mice carrying nondisrupted alleles. On the C57BL/6J background, no significant difference persisted between the carriers of the disrupted gene and their noncarrier siblings. The noncarriers on the mixed C57BL/6J-129 background, and the carriers or noncarriers on the C57BL/6J background, did not differ from C57BL/6J. The frequency of attacking males was identical in the homozygous carriers of the disrupted gene, in the mixed C57BL/6J-129 background, and in the 129/SvPas, which approximates the 129/SvJae strain from which the stem cells were derived to produce the disrupted Nos1 gene. These results suggest that Nos1 disruption was not implicated in attack behavior. A possible passenger-gene effect from the 129 donor strain is discussed.


Subject(s)
Aggression/physiology , Gene Transfer, Horizontal/genetics , Mice, Inbred C57BL/genetics , Nitric Oxide Synthase/genetics , Agonistic Behavior/physiology , Alleles , Animals , Crosses, Genetic , Female , Homozygote , Male , Mice , Neurons/enzymology
3.
Dev Psychobiol ; 34(2): 139-58, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10086232

ABSTRACT

Chromosomal mapping of genes linked with 19 measures of sensorial, motor, and body weight development were investigated. Chromosomal mapping is the first step towards gene identification. When a genomic region is shown to be linked to a trait, it is possible to select a reduced number of candidate genes that have been previously mapped on this region. The involvement of every gene can be individually tested either by molecular (transgenesis, homologous recombination) or traditional methods (congenicity). Mapping was performed using 389 males and females from two inbred strains of laboratory mice C57BL/6By and NZB/BlNJ, their reciprocal F1s and F2s. Thirty-six Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) were mapped, 12 reached the 3.13 lod score, being thus considered as confirmed. These QTL were tentatively labeled: Cliff Drop Aversion (Cliff Qtl), Geotaxia (Geot Qtl), Vertical Clinging (VertCling Qtl), Bar Holding with the 4 paws (BH4P Qtl), Age at Eyelid Opening (Aeyo Qtl), Visual Placing (Vispl Qtl), Startle Response (Start Qtl1, Start Qtl2), Body Weight at Day 10 in Males pooled with Females (Bwefmd10 Qtl), and Body Weight at Day 30 in males (Bwemd30 Qtl). For the majority of the developmental measures, the QTL that were mapped contributed little to the phenotypic variance, even when mitochondrial DNA contribution was included: Righting Response (12.7%), Cliff Drop Aversion (10%), Crossed Extensor Response (18.1%), Geotaxia (16.2%), Bar Holding Response for 10 s (12.1%), Bar Holding Response with 4 paws (8.1%), Vertical Clinging (9.3%), Vertical Climbing (5%), Startle Response (21.2%), Eyelid Opening (14.6%), Visual Placing (22%), Body Weight at Day 10 (27%), Body Weight at Day 15 in Females (52.5%), Body Weight at Day 15 in Males (17%), Body Weight at Day 30 in Females (42%), and Body Weight at Day 30 in Males (48%). A factorial analysis of the correlations between the measures of development did not provide evidence of a general factor. A general genetic factor of development was also rejected because few common genetic correlates were discovered for the 19 measures of development (Body Weight at Days 15 and 30 in Females on Chromosome 2, Eyelid Opening and Body Weight at Day 10 on Chromosome 5 and mitochondrial genome for five measures). Co-identification of genes, the function of which were previously known thanks to newly discovered QTL, should help to explain the function of QTL. Present data help to highlight candidate regions including several genes that could be candidates for the QTL function. Large confidence intervals were obtained as usual from the F2 intercrossed population. More stringent methods are suggested for more efficient co-identification.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Mapping , Locomotion/genetics , Minisatellite Repeats/genetics , Quantitative Trait, Heritable , Sensation/genetics , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Behavior, Animal , Body Weight/genetics , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Genetic Linkage/genetics , Genetic Variation/genetics , Genomic Imprinting , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Reflex, Startle/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...