Illness impact and adjustment to Parkinson's disease: before and after treatment with tolcapone.

Research on the impact of disease and treatment on health status and quality of life in patients with movement disorders is limited. We studied quality of life in 46 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to determine whether the impact of illness and psychosocial adjustment to illness were improved by 42 days of adjunctive therapy with tolcapone (50 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg three times a day). This study was conducted in parallel with a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the safety and efficacy of tolcapone in combination with levodopa/carbidopa therapy. Only a subset of individuals from the larger study participated. In the quality of life study, illness impact and adjustment to illness were measured subjectively by the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale-Self-Report (PAIS-SR). Patient ratings of total illness impact (p = 0.003), physical illness impact (p = 0.05), and psychosocial illness impact (p = 0.007) improved significantly in individuals receiving tolcapone compared with those receiving placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in adjustment to illness when the tolcapone and placebo groups were compared; however, 17 of 21 adjustment to illness indicators showed improvement.

Strategies for revealing dangerous concentrations of radon in buildings.

In this paper a technological and instrumental concept is given for solving the problem of rapidly determining significantly high radon concentrations in residential buildings.

Tolcapone improves motor function and reduces levodopa requirement in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Tolcapone Fluctuator Study Group I.

Tolcapone is a potent catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor that prolongs the plasma half-life of levodopa. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study used two 10-hour clinical evaluations to compare the efficacy and safety of three doses of tolcapone (50, 200, and 400 mg tid) with placebo in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations from levodopa/carbidopa. One hundred fifty-one patients completed the study. Clinical evaluations lasting 10 hours were performed on day -1 and day 42 using United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale and "on/off" and dyskinesia assessments every 30 minutes. Tolcapone significantly reduced "off" time an average of 40% and increased total "on" time by about 25% at all dose levels, as compared to placebo treatment. Levodopa/carbidopa dosage and frequency were significantly reduced. Tolcapone was well tolerated, with patients experiencing typical dopaminergic side effects that could be reduced or eliminated by lowering levodopa/carbidopa dosages. Tolcapone was effective at prolonging the clinical benefit of levodopa and reducing total levodopa requirements in PD patients with motor fluctuations.

Utility of an objective dyskinesia rating scale for Parkinson's disease: inter- and intrarater reliability assessment.

Although dyskinesia is a frequent and important problem in Parkinson's disease (PD), a reliable assessment measure has not been thoroughly developed and tested. We modified the Obeso dyskinesia scale to create an objective rating scale for dyskinesia assessment during activities of daily living. Thirteen physicians and 15 study coordinators involved in a clinical trial independently reviewed videotape segments of PD patients performing three tasks: walking, putting on a coat, and lifting a cup to the lips for drinking. Raters evaluated the severity of worst dyskinesia seen, the types of all dyskinesias seen, and the type of dyskinesia most associated with motoric disability. For all assessments, the total group showed statistically significant inter- and intrarater reliability. Physicians had a higher consistency than did coordinators, but for most measures the difference was not statistically significant. Physicians and coordinators found the scale easy to use and especially practical for rating dyskinesia severity and for identifying the most disabling dyskinesia. Dyskinesias can be assessed in clinical trials and warrant regular documentation.

Validity and reliability of the Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale.

The Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale (NAS) was developed to measure the full range of behavioral functioning from fully alert to deep coma. This investigator-rated scale was evaluated in 60 patients undergoing conscious sedation for maxillofacial procedures. The results obtained on the NAS were reliable, as evidenced by high correlations between the rating of the two raters. The scale is also valid as determined by high correlations between the NAS and a standard scale, the Glasgow Coma Scale (criterion validity) and between the NAS and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (behavioral validity). The NAS clearly distinguished between two levels of sedation (heavy and light). Furthermore, the NAS appears to be better able to discriminate among the different degrees of sedation in lightly sedated patients than the Glasgow Coma Scale.

Sleep, performance, and plasma levels in chronic insomniacs during 14-day use of flurazepam and midazolam: methodology.

Methods are described for a five-center study of flurazepam and midazolam, in which 107 patients with histories of benzodiazepine use for chronic insomnia were enrolled. Data were available for 99 of these patients. Staff and patient manuals and a behavior-based computer system were specially designed to measure and delineate clearly the study procedures and parameters. Patients were carefully followed and supported during a 20-day washout period and underwent extensive training on psychomotor performance tasks. They received placebo for 2 nights and were then randomly assigned to one of four study treatments--flurazepam 15 or 30 mg, midazolam 15 mg, or placebo--for 14 consecutive nights. All-night sleep electroencephalographic recordings were obtained on study nights--1 and 0 (placebo) and 1, 2, 7, 13, and 14 (treatment nights). Results of four computer-generated psychomotor performance tasks and three cognitive tasks, plus subjective evaluations of sleep, performance, and mood, were recorded in the morning after each night spent in the sleep laboratory. Blood and urine samples were analyzed for drug concentrations in plasma and for compliance with the protocol. A pilot study, using a high (nonclinical) dose of flurazepam (45 mg), preceded the multi-center study and was designed to evaluate tests in healthy volunteers and to familiarize staff with equipment and tests.

Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam.

The Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) Scale was developed to measure the level of alertness in subjects who are sedated. This scale was tested in 18 subjects in a three-period crossover study to assess its reliability and its criterion, behavioral, and construct validity. After receiving either placebo or a titrated dose of midazolam to produce light or heavy sedation, each subject was administered two sedation scales (OAA/S Scale and a Visual Analogue Scale) and two performances tests (Digit Symbol Substitution Test and Serial Sevens Subtraction). Two raters individually evaluated the subject's level of alertness on each of the two sedation scales. The results obtained on the OAA/S Scale were reliable and valid as measured by high correlations between the two raters and high correlations between the OAA/S Scale and two of the three standard tests used in this study. The OAA/S Scale was sensitive to the level of midazolam administered; all pairwise comparisons were significant (p less than 0.05) for all three treatment levels at both test periods.

Sleep, performance, and plasma levels in chronic insomniacs during 14-day use of flurazepam and midazolam: an introduction.

A review of the published literature reveals many unanswered questions regarding the effects of sedative-hypnotics on sleep, performance, and mood. The relationship between plasma half-life and hypnotic efficacy is also not clear. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-groups, multicenter study was designed to examine sleep, performance, and mood in patients with insomnia. A large, heterogeneous sample of patients with a history of benzodiazepine use for chronic insomnia was chosen to reflect the adult population for which sedative-hypnotics are often prescribed and to ensure statistical reliability. Although the major focus of the current study was on the effects of two benzodiazepine hypnotics on performance, this study also provided information on the following important issues: (1) effect of dose level; (2) short-versus long-term administration; and (3) significance of plasma half-life as it relates to hypnotic efficacy.

Efficacy without tolerance or rebound insomnia for midazolam and temazepam after use for one to three months.

Midazolam (15 mg) was compared with temazepam (30 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. An initial screening period was followed by 3 days of placebo baseline, 4 to 12 weeks of nightly oral use of the medication and a 4-day placebo withdrawal period. One hundred seventy-five patients with chronic insomnia participated in this multicenter outpatient study. Because the elimination half-life of midazolam, a new trizolobenzodiazepine hypnotic, is short (1.3-2.2 hr) compared to temazepam's (12-16 hr), more problems with tolerance and rebound insomnia were expected to occur. Hypnotic efficacy (increased total sleep time, decreased wake time, and decreased sleep latency) was demonstrated for both medications over the entire 3-month period without the development of tolerance. In fact, if anything, efficacy increased with time on medication, suggesting possible facilitation or "inverse tolerance" effect. On withdrawal, sleep was improved compared with baseline, suggesting partial resolution of the insomniac condition rather than rebound insomnia. These effects were both statistically and clinically significant for midazolam, with 16% to 50% improvement in sleep measures. The results of this study suggest that patients with chronic insomnia may benefit from 30 to 90 days of treatment. A three-factor model that separates pharmacologic from behavioral and psychologic effects of hypnotics was proposed to explain these results in part.

Sedative-hypnotics and human performance.

In 52 studies, performance data were obtained the next day following bedtime ingestion of a sedative-hypnotic or a placebo. Only eight of these studies used insomniac patients. Most studies used young adult males. Benzodiazepine hypnotics were most frequently administered and psychomotor performance was most often measured. Little consistent data are available on cognitive functioning and more complex behavior. Drug-related improvement in performance was not found, and, in comparing active drug to placebo, it is clear that all hypnotics, at some doses, produce decrements in performance the next day. Higher doses consistently showed a decrement, and this decrement was usually persistent over the entire day. Although long-acting drugs generally showed more performance decrement, half-life data were not consistent.