Prevalence and determinants of poor glycaemic control: a cross-sectional study among Moroccan type 2 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes remains poorly controlled in a high proportion of diabetes patients. This study examines the prevalence of poor glycaemic control and associated factors in type 2 diabetes patients in the Beni-Mellal Khenifra region in Morocco. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2017 among 1456 diabetes patients attending primary health centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected through face-to-face interviews using structured and pre-tested questionnaires. Anthropometric measurements, including body weight, height and waist circumference were taken using standardized techniques and calibrated equipment. Glycaemic control was assessed in terms of the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level and poor glycaemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥7% and a level <7% reflects good glycaemic control. RESULTS: Of the total participants, 66.3% had poor glycaemic control. Bivariate analysis showed that sex (p=0.010), education level (p=0.013), body mass index (p=0.048), duration of diabetes (p<0.0001) and type of therapeutic regimen (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with HbA1c level. However, multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that only a longer duration of diabetes (OR 1.525 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.183-1.967], p=0.001) and receiving insulin therapy alone (OR 1.589 [95% CI 1.157-2.183], p=0.004) or a combination of oral antidiabetics with insulin (OR 2.554 [95% CI 1.786-3.653], p<0.001) were significantly associated with inadequate glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the particularities of the region, the findings about glycaemic control and its cross-sectionally associated factors are in line with findings from other regions of Morocco. In this subgroup, the longer duration of diabetes and insulin treatment could constitute a cause leading to poor glycaemic control. However, inverse causality cannot be excluded.

Prevalence of overweight/obesity and its associated factors among a sample of Moroccan type 2 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: Obesity constitutes a major risk factor for the development of diabetes, and has been linked with poor glycaemic control among type 2 diabetic patients. AIMS: This study examines the prevalence of overweight/obesity and associated factors in type 2 diabetic patients in the Beni-Mellal Khenifra region in Morocco. METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017 among 975 diabetes patients attending primary health centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected through face-to-face interviews. Anthropometric measurements, including body weight, height and waist circumference, were taken using standardized techniques and calibrated equipment. RESULTS: The prevalence of overweight was 40.4%, the general obesity was 28.8% and the abdominal obesity was 73.7%. Using multivariate analysis, we noted that the general obesity was associated with female sex (AOR= 3,004, 95% CI: 1.761-5.104, P<0.001), increased age (AOR=2.192, 95% CI: 1.116-4.307, P<0.023) and good glycaemic control (AOR=1.594, 95% CI: 1.056-2.407, P=0.027), whereas abdominal obesity was associated wih female sex (AOR=2.654, 95% CI: 1.507-4.671, P<0.001) and insulin treatment (AOR=2.927, 95% CI: 1.031-8.757, P=0.048). CONCLUSION: Overweight, general obesity and abdominal obesity were high among participants, especially among women. Taken together, these findings urge the implementation of a roadmap for this diabetic subpopulation to have a new lifestyle.

Assessement of stress induced by high-fidelity simulation sessions among medical students.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation is a growing pedagogical method in training health professionals. The use of high-fidelity simulators may be associated with significant stress. OBJECTIVE: to measure self-assessed intensity of stress before and after a planned simulation training session of a third degree atrio-ventricular block  among  medical students. METHODS: A sample of 30 students participating in a high-fidelity simulation training course (10 playing the role of team leader and 20 in the role of medical intern) was studied. Stress was evaluated by self-assessment using a numerical scale before and after the session. The peri-traumatic distress inventory was used to measure the level of distress experienced by the participants. RESULTS: The median stress score was 3, 5±2, 4 before and 6, 2±2, 4 after the simulation session (p<0.001). Stress intensity increased significantly after the session in students playing the role of the team leader than those playing the role of medical intern (8, 4±0, 8 versus 5, 2±2, 3 p<0.001).The average score for peri-traumatic distress inventory was also significantly higher in the team leaders (18, 8±10, 4 Vs 9, 2±3, 7 p=0,022). CONCLUSION: Simulation-induced stress, as measured by self-assessment, increased significantly after the session and was influenced by the role to be played during the scenario.  Stress should be taken into account before debriefing.