Hybrid NOTES colectomy for right-sided colonic tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Given the limitation of surgical access and instrumentation, pure NOTES technique currently appears challenging for colorectal surgery. As such, we would like to determine the technical feasibility and clinical results of hybrid NOTES right hemicolectomy with transrectal extraction of specimen. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: After the right-sided colon was fully mobilized and vessels ligated, bowel resection and intracorporeal side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis were performed with endostaplers. The Transanal Endoscopic Operations device was inserted transanally. The resected specimen was removed via the Transanal Endoscopic Operations device through an enterotomy made over the anterior wall of the upper rectum. DISCUSSION: The operation was performed on a 42-year-old woman and lasted 120 minutes; blood loss was 30 mL. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 5. The median pain score was 2 (range, 2-3). Our preliminary experience shows that hybrid NOTES right hemicolectomy is safe and feasible. The technique eliminates the need for mini-laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, and it offers promise in this era of minimally invasive surgery.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus total laparoscopic right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer is associated with definite short-term benefits, and is increasingly practised worldwide. The limitations of a pure laparoscopic approach include a relative lack of tactile feedback and long procedural time. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery was introduced in an attempt to facilitate operation by improving the tactile sensation. To date, there is no consensus as to which approach is better. Herein we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with total laparoscopic colectomy (TLC) in the management of right-sided colonic cancer. METHODS: Adult patients with carcinoma of the caecum and ascending colon were recruited and randomized to undergo either HALC or TLC. Measured outcomes included operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative morbidities, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence and patient survival. RESULTS: Sixty patients (HALC=30, TLC=30) were recruited. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, gender distribution, body mass index and final histopathological staging. No difference was observed between the groups in terms of operating time, conversion rate, operative blood loss, pain score and length of hospital stay. With a median follow-up of 27 to 33 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5-year survival rates remained similar (83%vs 80%, P=0.923). CONCLUSION: HALC is safe and feasible, but it does not show any significant benefits over TLC in terms of operating time and conversion rate. Routine use of the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique in right hemicolectomy is therefore not recommended.

The outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection in T4 cancer.

AIM: Laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced tumours with extramural involvement is still controversial. It is believed that laparoscopic excision of T4 cancers is technically difficult and may result in prolonged operative time, increased conversion rate, added postoperative morbidity, and suboptimal oncological clearance. METHOD: Our unit has been practising laparoscopic colorectal surgery since 1992, and all data are entered into a database prospectively. Since 1999 we have routinely used the laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resections. Data regarding patients with a histologically T4 cancer operated on between 1999 and 2008 were analysed. Outcomes included operating time, conversion rate, postoperative complications and oncological outcome. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, 146 patients (male 75) with a T4 cancer underwent laparoscopic resection. The median operating time was 125 (range, 46-285) min and the median blood loss was 50 (0-1800) ml. The conversion rate was 16%. Six (4.1%) patients experienced anastomotic leakage. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 13 (2-40). One hundred and two (70%) patients underwent curative resection. The recurrence rates were 41% and 53% for stage II and III patients, respectively. Four (3.9%) patients had local recurrence. At a median follow up of 18 (1-118) months, the overall survival was 25 months, with median overall survival for patients with stage II, III and IV disease being 63, 36 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colectomy in histologically T4 cancer is safe. Oncological outcomes remain satisfactory. Based on our data, provided expertise is available, patients with locally advanced tumours should not be excluded from a laparoscopic approach.

Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: 10-year report.

AIM: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently the gold standard for resection of mid or low rectal cancer and is associated with a low local recurrence rate. However, few studies have reported the long-term oncological outcome following use of a laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncological outcome after laparoscopic sphincter-preserving TME with a median follow up of about 4 years. METHOD: Patients with mid or low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic sphincter-preserving TME with curative intent between March 1999 and March 2009 were prospectively recruited for analysis. RESULTS: During the 10-year study period, 177 patients underwent laparoscopic sphincter-preserving TME with curative intent for rectal cancer. Conversion was required in two (1%) patients. There was no operative mortality. At a median follow-up period of 49 months, local recurrence had occurred in nine (5.1%) patients. The overall metastatic recurrence rate after curative resection was 22%. The overall 5-year survival and 5-year disease-free survival in the present study were 74% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that laparoscopic sphincter-preserving TME is safe with long-term oncological outcomes comparable to those of open surgery.

A case report of small bowel perforation at colonoscopy.

The most dreaded complication of a colonoscopy is colonic perforation. Perforation of the small bowel following colonoscopy is extremely rare, especially if the procedure was performed without any therapeutic intervention. Herein we report a case of jejunal perforation following a routine surveillance colonoscopy. A literature review focusing on the proposed mechanism of perforation is included.

Laparoscopic anterior resection.

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is increasingly practiced worldwide in the last 2 decades. However, due to procedural complexity, laparoscopic rectal cancer excision had not proceeded at a similar pace. This article deals with the technique of laparoscopic anterior resection. Resection of rectosigmoid or upper rectal tumors is first described, followed by the more difficult sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision. We have been using and modifying this technique of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer since 1990 s. In our recent review, the local recurrence rate was 7.4%, and the overall 5-year survival was 70%. Our data suggest laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is safe and is the procedure of choice in selected patients.

Obstructive complications of laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy.

PURPOSE: The use of defunctioning ileostomy is a common practice to reduce the septic complications after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. In open surgery, the fashioning of ileostomy is a straightforward procedure. However, in the laparoscopic approach, this can be a difficult task and obstructive complications can occur postoperatively. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken for all patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection and defunctioning loop ileostomy over a 15-year period. RESULTS: In this period, 161 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery with defunctioning ileostomy. Eight patients developed obstructive complications in the early postoperative period requiring surgical intervention (5 percent). All patients presented with intestinal obstruction from the fourth to the sixth postoperative day. The median time to reoperation was 9.5 days (range, 5 to 19). The causes of obstructive complications were twisting of the ileostomy (n = 3), adhesive kinking proximal to the ileostomy (n = 3), tight fascia (n = 1), and both tight fascia and twisting of ileostomy (n = 1). Six patients underwent laparotomy for diagnosis and refashioning of ileostomy. The seventh patient had endoscopic decompression of small bowel and refashioning of ileostomy. The last patient was successfully managed with combined endoscopic and laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Various pitfalls can occur in laparoscopically created defunctioning ileostomy. Measures can be taken to minimize these technical errors. Various surgical reinterventions can be attempted to determine the cause. With combined uses of enteroscope and laparoscope, a laparotomy can be avoided.

Stapled technique for acute thrombosed hemorrhoids: a randomized, controlled trial with long-term results.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare stapled vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy for patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids. METHODS: Forty-one patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids were randomized into: 1) stapled hemorrhoidectomy (PPH group; n = 21), and 2) open hemorrhoidectomy (open group; n = 20). Emergency surgery was performed with perioperative data and complications were recorded. Patients were followed up by independent assessors to evaluate pain, recurrence, continence function, and satisfaction at regular intervals. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the PPH group and open group were 59 and 56 weeks, respectively. There was no significant difference in terms of the hospital stay, complication rate, and continence function; however, the mean pain intensity in the first postoperative week was significantly less in the PPH group (4.1 vs. 5.7, P = 0.02). Patients in the PPH group recovered significantly faster in terms of the time to become analgesic-free (4 vs. 8.5 days, P < 0.01), time to become pain-free (9 vs. 20.5 days, P = 0.01), resumption of work (7 vs. 12.5 days, P = 0.01), and time for complete wound healing (2 vs. 4 weeks, P < 0.01). On long-term follow-up, significantly fewer patients in the PPH group complained of recurrent symptoms (0 vs. 5, P = 0.02). The overall symptom improvement and patients' satisfaction were significantly better in the PPH group (90 vs. 80 percent, P = 0.03 and +3 vs. +2, P < 0.01 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is safe and effective for acute thrombosed hemorrhoids. Similar to elective stapled procedure, emergency stapled excision has greater short-term benefits compared with conventional excision: diminished pain, faster recovery, and earlier return to work. Long-term results and satisfaction were excellent.

Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in a scuba diver.

Pneumomediastinum usually occurs following an airleak from the lungs, or from a perforated oesophagus. We report on a 30-year-old man who developed pneumomediastinum after scuba diving. The patient presented with acute onset of throat pain, odynophagia, and hoarseness of voice. The literature is reviewed for this condition.

Immediate preoperative laparoscopic staging for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Conventional preoperative staging for esophageal carcinoma could be inaccurate. Laparoscopy has been applied for the staging of various upper gastrointestinal malignancies. It can identify peritoneal and liver deposits not shown by imaging, and could reduce the number of nontherapeutic laparotomies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic staging for the management of squamous cell carcinoma involving the mid and distal esophagus. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients with esophageal cancer evaluated for surgical resection from January 1998 to January 2004. Laparoscopy was performed for all the patients with mid and distal esophageal cancer immediately before open gastric mobilization. The efficacy of laparoscopy for the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 63 patients with potentially resectable disease shown on conventional imaging, 54 (84%) underwent esophagectomy with curative intent after laparoscopic staging. Seven patients (11%) underwent laparoscopy alone because of abdominal metastases (n = 5) or other medical conditions (n = 2) that precluded esophagectomy. Two patients (3%) had exploratory right thoracotomy without esophagectomy despite normal laparoscopic findings. The sensitivity and specificity of laparoscopic staging were 100% in this series of patients (100% sensitivity and specificity means no false-positives or -negatives). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic staging is valuable for the management of patients with mid and distal squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Patients with metastatic disease and those with prohibitive surgical risk can thus avoid unnecessary laparotomy and be offered other treatment methods.

Acute gastric volvulus: an unusual cause of gastric outlet obstruction.

Gastric outlet obstruction initiated by acute gastric volvulus is rare but potentially fatal. An unusual case of intrathoracic acute gastric volvulus complicated by distal stomach and transverse colon herniation into retrocardial space is reported. Prompt clinical diagnosis was followed by emergency laparoscopic de-rotation and gastropexy.