Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 2015, 2023 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37037813

ABSTRACT

Strong tsunami excitation from slow rupture of shallow subduction zone faults is recognized as a key concern for tsunami hazard assessment. Three months after the 22 July 2020 magnitude 7.8 thrust earthquake struck the plate boundary below the Shumagin Islands, Alaska, a magnitude 7.6 aftershock ruptured with complex intraplate faulting. Despite the smaller size and predominantly strike-slip faulting mechanism inferred from seismic waves for the aftershock, it generated much larger tsunami waves than the mainshock. Here we show through detailed analysis of seismic, geodetic, and tsunami observations of the aftershock that the event implicated unprecedented source complexity, involving weakly tsunamigenic fast rupture of two intraplate faults located below and most likely above the plate boundary, along with induced strongly tsunamigenic slow thrust slip on a third fault near the shelf break likely striking nearly perpendicular to the trench. The thrust slip took over 5 min, giving no clear expression in seismic or geodetic observations while producing the sizeable far-field tsunami.

3.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 39(11): 1654-1657, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27380870

ABSTRACT

Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) system is a new concept and technology of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Elective EVAS using Nellix device was performed for a 83-year-old man with AAA. 2-month post-EVAS CTA surveillance demonstrated mild enlargement of aneurysmal sac and separation of the EndoBags, but without detectable endoleak. The patient developed sudden AAA rupture with retroperitoneal hematoma at about 4 months after EVAS. We postulated that early enlargement of aneurysmal sac and separation of EndoBags of Nellix devices after EVAS, even without detectable endoleak, might indicate significant aneurysmal wall weakening with increased risk of later AAA rupture. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this was the first reported case of aortic rupture after EVAS without detectable endoleak during and after the procedure.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Aged, 80 and over , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Aortography/methods , Humans , Male , Risk , Stents , Time , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...