The Stresses of Surrogate Decision-Making: Contributing Factors and Clinicians' Role in Mitigation.

BACKGROUND: Surrogate Decision-Makers (surrogates) are frequently employed in decision-making for critically ill adults. There are insufficient data considering the surrogate experience, stress, and potential for mitigation. METHODS: An anonymous online survey queried (1) medical situation (2) total stress (3) demographics (4) potential factors, including sources of information about patient wishes, external sources of support or competing stressors, and their interactions with the medical team through the experience. RESULTS: 108 respondents were included; 91 completed all items. Most respondents ranked their experience as a surrogate as one of the most stressful experiences of their lives; this was associated with whether it was an end-of-life decision (P = .003), Respondent Religion (P = .015), or religious or spiritual beliefs (P = .024), and having their own health problems (P = .008). On individual Likert responses, surrogates reported significant stress mitigation when they felt they had been helpful (P < .001), knew the patient's wishes (P = .0011), specifically discussed patient wishes (P < .001), or patient's wishes were documented (P < .001). Items about surrogate-team interaction also met significance, including the physician being communicative and available (P < .001), respectful (P = .007), honest (P < .001), and validating (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate stress is an evolving area for research. Significant factors included relationship with the medical team, making this an important area for HPM to play a key role in mitigating surrogate stress.

Consultation-Liaison Telepsychiatry: A Coded Thematic Analysis of Clinicians' Reported Experiences.

BACKGROUND: Telepsychiatry is now common practice. Within consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP), previous work has shown that telepsychiatry is feasible and satisfactory. To date, there has not been qualitative work done within CLP to describe the clinician's experience with telepsychiatry. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a thematic analysis of clinicians' perceived benefits and limitations of providing telepsychiatry in CLP. METHODS: An anonymous clinician survey querying demographics, education, training, technological experience, and practice characteristics was distributed via social media and professional listservs, the quantitative results of which are presented elsewhere. Two questions (What was the best/worst aspect of adapting to telepsychiatry?) required free-text responses; comments were allowed elsewhere. We performed a thematic analysis of the text responses because of its flexibility and ability to develop new insights. We synthesized and generated a codebook iteratively. Initial coding was completed by 3 co-authors independently, followed by discussion to build consensus. We used qualitative content analysis to better understand common trends and frequencies in the data. Saturation of themes was reached. RESULTS: A total of 333 behavioral health clinicians completed the survey, including 197 CLP participants. Most respondents (98.5%) responded to at least 1 open-answer question, with 314 reporting the worst aspects of telepsychiatry and 315 reporting the best aspects. Respondents made insightful comments about boundaries, public health implications, and the need for training. We categorized the results into implications for practice, therapeutic relationship, and uniquely affected populations. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that telepsychiatry has both unique benefits and limitations within CLP. Our work examines and describes these nuances. We believe that future use of telepsychiatry will be synergistic with in-person care and that the 2 modalities will be used together to maximize benefits. A public health focus on improving Internet access and simplifying interstate licensure would improve equitable access and utilization of outpatient telepsychiatry. Telepsychiatry can be successful for inpatient Consultation-Liaison work but requires thoughtful triage and teamwork.

Pilot Assessment of Patient and Provider Characteristics Associated With Satisfactory Consultation-Liaison Telepsychiatry Encounters.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic created pressure to attempt remote consultation, but there are limited data on the use of telepsychiatry in general, and almost none about the experience of telepsychiatry in a consultation-liaison context. OBJECTIVE: We looked for attributes that correlated with satisfactory tele-encounters. METHODS: Eleven consultation-liaison attending surveys and 8 attendings' tele-encounter logs from March to June 2020 were completed and reviewed to assess for patient and provider characteristics associated with barriers to using telepsychiatry. RESULTS: A vast majority of 223 tele-psychiatric encounters were acceptable to providers in terms of technology (82%) and their ability to form a connection with the patient (78%). In multivariable logistic regression models, an unresolvable difficulty in using the platform was less common for female patients (odds ratio = 0.239, P = 0.002) and more common for patients who prefer a non-English language (odds ratio = 9.059, P < 0.001); achieving a personal connection that felt right was also less likely for patients who prefer a non-English language (odds ratio = 0.189, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Telepsychiatry has previously been limited to outpatient use and, generally, for providers and patients who specifically preferred it. However, abrupt transition to the use of telepsychiatry to limit contagion risk was mostly satisfactory in our center; identifying for which patient encounters it is most and least appropriate will help guide future use.

Systematic Review of Gut Microbiota and Major Depression.

Background: Recently discovered relationships between the gastrointestinal microbiome and the brain have implications for psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD). Bacterial transplantation from MDD patients to rodents produces depression-like behaviors. In humans, case-control studies have examined the gut microbiome in healthy and affected individuals. We systematically reviewed existing studies comparing gut microbial composition in MDD and healthy volunteers. Methods: A PubMed literature search combined the terms "depression," "depressive disorder," "stool," "fecal," "gut," and "microbiome" to identify human case-control studies that investigated relationships between MDD and microbiota quantified from stool. We evaluated the resulting studies, focusing on bacterial taxa that were different between MDD and healthy controls. Results: Six eligible studies were found in which 50 taxa exhibited differences (p < 0.05) between patients with MDD and controls. Patient characteristics and methodologies varied widely between studies. Five phyla-Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Protobacteria-were represented; however, divergent results occurred across studies for all phyla. The largest number of differentiating taxa were within phylum Firmicutes, in which nine families and 12 genera differentiated the diagnostic groups. The majority of these families and genera were found to be statistically different between the two groups in two identified studies. Family Lachnospiraceae differentiated the diagnostic groups in four studies (with an even split in directionality). Across all five phyla, nine genera were higher in MDD (Anaerostipes, Blautia, Clostridium, Klebsiella, Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis, Parabacteroides, Parasutterella, Phascolarctobacterium, and Streptococcus), six were lower (Bifidobacterium, Dialister, Escherichia/Shigella, Faecalibacterium, and Ruminococcus), and six were divergent (Alistipes, Bacteroides, Megamonas, Oscillibacter, Prevotella, and Roseburia). We highlight mechanisms and products of bacterial metabolism as they may relate to the etiology of depression. Conclusions: No consensus has emerged from existing human studies of depression and gut microbiome concerning which bacterial taxa are most relevant to depression. This may in part be due to differences in study design. Given that bacterial functions are conserved across taxonomic groups, we propose that studying microbial functioning may be more productive than a purely taxonomic approach to understanding the gut microbiome in depression.

"What We Have Here is a Failure to Communicate": Association of Preferred Language With the Rate of Psychiatric Consultation.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, people with limited English proficiency (LEP) receive poorer medical care than those proficient in English. Few studies demonstrate how linguistic barriers complicate psychiatric care; in consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry, there are no published data about care disparities for patients with LEP or for whom English is not the preferred language (PL). OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if PL affects the psychiatric consultation rate. METHODS: Among adult patients admitted during 1 year to a large urban academic medical center, we compared psychiatric consultation rates in English PL patients with non-English PL patients. PL was ascertained from demographics during the medical record. The occurrence of psychiatric consultation was ascertained from C-L service logs. RESULTS: There were 54,534 admissions: the no-consultation group (N = 53,196) and the consultation group (N = 1,398). English as PL was more common in the consult group (72.0% of consult group, 62.0% of no-consult group, χ2 = 92.98, p < 0.0001). Spanish speakers were underrepresented in the consult group (14.2% of consult, 25.8% of no-consult, χ2 = 98.78, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Primary teams requested more consultations for patients whose PL was English than for patients with other PLs, suggesting that psychiatric needs of patients with non-English PL may be unaddressed. This is the first study to demonstrate a disproportionately low rate of general hospital psychiatric consultations in this population. Further study is necessary to confirm and understand this disparity. We recommend routine use of professional interpreters and low threshold for consultation in patients with non-English PL.