Diagnostic Utility of Computed Tomography Perfusion in the Telestroke Setting.

BACKGROUND: Definitive diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke is challenging, particularly in telestroke settings. Although the prognostic utility of CT perfusion (CTP) has been questioned, its diagnostic value remains under-appreciated, especially in cases without an easily visible intracranial occlusion. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of routine CTP in the acute telestroke setting. METHODS: Acute and follow-up data collected prospectively from consecutive suspected patients with stroke assessed by a state-wide telestroke service between March 2020 and August 2021 at 12 sites in Australia were analyzed. All patients in the final analysis had been assessed with multimodal CT, including CTP, which was post-processed with automated volumetric software. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated for multimodal CT and each individual component (noncontrast CT [NCCT], CT angiogram [CTA], and CTP). Final diagnosis determined by consensus review of follow-up imaging and clinical data was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: During the study period, complete multimodal CT examination was obtained in 831 patients, 457 of whom were diagnosed with stroke. Diagnostic sensitivity for ischemic stroke increased by 19.5 percentage points when CTP was included with NCCT and CTA compared with NCCT and CTA alone (73.1% positive with NCCT+CTA+CTP [95% CI, 68.8-77.1] versus 53.6% positive with NCCT+CTA alone [95% CI, 48.9-58.3], P<0.001). No difference was observed between specificities of NCCT+CTA and NCCT+CTA+CTP (98.7% [95% CI, 98.5-100] versus 98.7% [95% CI, 96.9-99.6], P=0.13). Multimodal CT, including CTP, demonstrated the highest negative predictive value (75.0% [95% CI, 72.1-77.7]). Patients with stroke not evident on CTP had small volume infarcts on follow-up (1.2 mL, interquartile range 0.5-2.7mL). CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition of CTP as part of a telestroke imaging protocol permits definitive diagnosis of cerebral ischemia in 1 in 5 patients with normal NCCT and CTA.

Diagnostic value of clinical examination for identifying patients with large- and small-fibre neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of polyneuropathy usually requires neurophysiological investigation, necessitating specialised testing and interpretation thereby increasing the time to final diagnosis. AIMS: To investigate the predictive value of the clinical examination in patients with potential neuropathies. METHODS: Patients were recruited based on their referral requesting neurophysiological testing. Two examiners tested ankle jerk reflexes and gradient to temperature sensation prior to the patient undergoing neurophysiology investigations, blinded to subsequent testing results. The neurophysiology investigations were either standard nerve conduction study (NCS) or thermal threshold testing (TTT) or both. These data were then analysed to determine the Kappa between examiners as well as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. RESULTS: There was a modest level of agreement between examiners for ankle jerk testing (Kappa = 0.6) but poor agreement for gradient temperature testing (Kappa = 0.3). Bilateral absence of ankle jerk reflexes was moderately associated with abnormal NCS, with the following characteristics: sensitivity 72%, specificity 91%, positive likelihood ratio 7.6 and negative likelihood ratio 0.3. The presence of a temperature gradient was poorly diagnostic for abnormal TTT: sensitivity 87%, specificity 14%, with positive and negative likelihood ratios close to 1. CONCLUSION: The absence of ankle jerks performed moderately well in identifying patients likely to have large-fibre neuropathy and could potentially be used to help decide who should be sent for NCS. Gradient temperature testing was much more subjective and did not change the likelihood of abnormal TTT.