ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe and highlight the current use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treatment landscape, particularly focusing on the perioperative setting. We provide a comprehensive review of key trials of the use of ICI in the perioperative setting, discussing trial outcomes and limitations and reviewing the role of biomarkers. INTRODUCTION: ICIs have recently been integrated into the treatment algorithm for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. More than 30 published studies have investigated the role of these agents in the radical treatment of MIBC. Some studies have demonstrated conflicting results, affecting widespread adoption in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a narrative overview of the literature from databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, European society of Medical Oncology/American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Proceedings, and clinicaltrials.gov databases up until December 2021. DISCUSSION: We described the results of key trials in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, some of the reasons for conflicting study results, and the implications for clinical practice. Relevant biomarkers in the field are discussed, alongside a brief overview of the immune microenvironment in bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative ICIs have shown promising efficacy with low toxicity in the neoadjuvant setting. The two large trials in the adjuvant setting have been contradictory. The efficacy of perioperative ICIs combined with favorable tolerability and better toxicity profile compared with chemotherapy, with the potential for biomarker-driven patient selection, may lead to a change in future practice. There is, however, a lack of long-term survival and toxicity data for those treated with ICIs, and this needs to be developed further to demonstrate an added survival benefit by using ICIs.
ABSTRACT
Glioblastoma, a WHO grade IV astrocytoma, is a highly aggressive and heterogeneous tumour that infiltrates deeply into surrounding brain parenchyma, making complete surgical resection impossible. Despite chemo-radiotherapy, the residual cell population within brain parenchyma post-surgery causes inevitable recurrence. Previously, the tumour core has been the focus of research and the basis for targeted therapeutic regimes, which have failed to improve survival in clinical trials. Here, we focus on the invasive margin as defined by the region with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5ALA) (GliolanTM) fluorescence at surgery beyond the T1 enhancing region on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This area is hypothesized to constitute unique microenvironmental pressures, and consequently be molecularly distinct to tumour core and enhancing rim regions. We conducted hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), array real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and immunohistochemistry staining on various intra-tumour regions of glioblastoma to determine molecular heterogeneity between regions. We analyzed 73 tumour samples from 21 patients and compared cellular density, cell proliferation, and the degree of vascularity. There is a statistically significant difference between the core, invasive margin and other regions for cell density (p < 0.001), cell proliferation (p = 0.029), and vascularity (p = 0.007). Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) and Nestin immunohistochemistry were used as a measure of stem-like properties, showing significantly decreased Nestin expression (p < 0.0001) in the invasive margin. Array PCR of the core, rim, and invasive regions showed significantly increased fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and ALDH1 expression in the invasive zone, with elevated hypoxia inducing factor 1-alpha (HIF1α) in the rim region, adjacent to the hypoxic core. The influence of varying microenvironments in the intra-tumour regions is a major key to understanding intra-tumour heterogeneity. This study confirms the distinct molecular composition of the heterogeneous invasive margin and cautions against purported therapy strategies that target candidate glioblastoma stem-like genes that are predominantly expressed in the tumour core. Full characterization of tumour cells in the invasive margin is critical, as these cells may more closely resemble the residual cell population responsible for tumour recurrence. Their unique nature should be considered when developing targeted agents for residual glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
