Male contraception: What do women think?

INTRODUCTION: Women currently bear the most responsibility in contraception, with a wide choice of methods, while only a few existing male contraceptives are available. However, it has been shown that men are willing to get involved in birth control and to control their own fertility. Our research was focused on female population and a survey was carried out to explore women's perceptions of male contraception. METHODS: An observational quantitative cross-sectional study using a self-administered-questionnaire was carried out between November 2019 and February 2020. All women aged from 16-years-old to menopause completing the questionnaire were included. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted, qualitative variables were expressed as counts and frequency. RESULTS: In total, 379 interpretable completed questionnaires were included. Among the women, 69.7% were in favour of letting men deal with contraception, without referring to a specific method. After having been made aware of the medical information concerning existing male contraceptives and those in development, the proportion of women in favour dropped to 46.7%. The most acceptable method for a majority of women was the male pill, which is still being developed. The majority (78.4%) of the women in our survey felt insufficiently informed about male contraception. DISCUSSION: In our study, women seemed to want to share contraceptive responsibility with men, but the lack of information and of acceptable contraception methods available remained an obstacle. Although larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these results, the development of a wider range of male contraception methods seems to be what both men and women have long been expecting.

Amsler's sign associated significantly with Fuch's heterochromic cyclitis (FHC).

To investigate the frequency and diagnostic significance of Amsler's sign in patients with Fuch's heterochromic cyclitis (FHC), we performed a diagnostic AC puncture of the eyes of 31 patients with this disease and looked for the same sign in 104 patients with intermediate uveitis and 373 patients with various other types of uveitis who underwent the same procedure. AS was significantly more frequent in the FHC patients than in either of the other two groups of patients, and occurred infrequently in all other types of chronic uveitis. We therefore consider its occurrence to have important differential diagnostic value. We would also emphasize the pathophysiologic significance of AS and suggest that this aspect be investigated in the future.