Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 139
Filter
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(5)2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cases of autoimmune bullous dermatosis (AIBD) have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide an overview of clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of AIBDs following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and searched the Embase, Cochrane Library, and Medline databases from their inception to 27 March 2024. We included all studies reporting ≥ 1 patient who developed new-onset AIBD or experienced flare of AIBD following at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. RESULTS: We included 98 studies with 229 patients in the new-onset group and 216 in the flare group. Among the new-onset cases, bullous pemphigoid (BP) was the most frequently reported subtype. Notably, mRNA vaccines were commonly associated with the development of AIBD. Regarding the flare group, pemphigus was the most frequently reported subtype, with the mRNA vaccines being the predominant vaccine type. The onset of AIBD ranged from 1 to 123 days post-vaccination, with most patients displaying favorable outcomes and showing improvement or resolution from 1 week to 8 months after treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Both new-onset AIBD and exacerbation of pre-existing AIBD may occur following COVID-19 vaccination. Healthcare practitioners should be alert, and post-vaccination monitoring may be essential.

3.
JAMA Dermatol ; 160(5): 525-534, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568509

ABSTRACT

Importance: Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and cotrimoxazole (CTX), a fixed-dose combination of SMX and trimethoprim in a 5:1 ratio, are antibacterial sulfonamides commonly used for treating various diseases. A substantial prevalence of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) following the administration of these drugs has been reported. However, the association between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes and SMX/CTX-induced SCARs has remained unclear. Objective: To investigate the association between HLA genotypes and SMX/CTX-induced SCARs. Data sources: A comprehensive search was conducted in CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to January 17, 2023. Study Selection: Case-control studies that recruited patients who had experienced SCARs following SMX or CTX were included, and HLA alleles were analyzed. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent authors extracted data on study characteristics and outcome data. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies was used to assess study quality. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model for meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified outcome was the OR comparing SMX/CTX-induced SCARs with healthy or SMX/CTX-tolerant controls based on different HLA alleles. Results: Six studies involving 322 patients with SCAR were included, including 236 patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, 86 with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, 8448 healthy controls, and 229 tolerant controls. Significant associations were found in HLA-A*11:01 (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.11-4.00), HLA-B*13:01 (OR, 5.96; 95% CI, 1.58-22.56), HLA-B*15:02 (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.20-4.14), HLA-B*38:02 (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.42-8.48), and HLA-C*08:01 (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.07-6.44) compared with tolerant controls. In the Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis subgroup, significant associations were found in HLA-B*15:02 (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.56-5.80) and HLA-B*38:02 (OR, 5.13; 95% CI, 1.96-13.47). In the drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms subgroup, significant associations were found in HLA-A*68:01 (OR, 12.86; 95% CI, 1.09-151.34), HLA-B*13:01 (OR, 23.09; 95% CI, 3.31-161.00), HLA-B*39:01 (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.31-15.82). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that multiple HLA alleles (HLA-A*11:01, HLA-B*13:01, HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*38:02, and HLA-C*0801) are associated with SMX/CTX-induced SCARs.


Subject(s)
Drug Eruptions , HLA Antigens , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination , Humans , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/adverse effects , HLA Antigens/genetics , HLA Antigens/immunology , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Eruptions/epidemiology , Drug Eruptions/immunology , Sulfamethoxazole/adverse effects , Genotype , Severity of Illness Index , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies
4.
Clin Kidney J ; 17(1): sfad292, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38186874

ABSTRACT

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI has not been systematically examined. Additionally, exposure to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were considered as risk factors for AKI, but with inconclusive results in ICI-related AKI. Our aim was to analyse the occurrence rate of all-cause AKI and ICI-related AKI and the occurrence rates of severe AKI and dialysis-requiring AKI, and to determine whether exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs poses a risk for all-cause and ICI-related AKI. Methods: This study population was adult ICI recipients. A systematic review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed through October 2023. We included prospective trials and observational studies that reported any of the following outcomes: the occurrence rate of all-cause or ICI-related AKI, the relationship between PPI or NSAID exposure and AKI development or the mortality rate in the AKI or non-AKI group. Proportional meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Results: A total of 120 studies comprising 46 417 patients were included. The occurrence rates of all-cause AKI were 7.4% (14.6% from retrospective studies and 1.2% from prospective clinical trials). The occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI was 3.2%. The use of PPIs was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.18] for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.96-2.97) for ICI-related AKI. The use of NSAIDs was associated with an OR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.10-2.83) for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.57 (95% CI 1.68-3.93) for ICI-related AKI. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed that approximately 1 in 13 adult ICI recipients may experience all-cause AKI, while 1 in 33 adult ICI recipients may experience ICI-related AKI. Exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs was associated with an increased OR risk for AKI in the current meta-analysis.

5.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(3): 737-745, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Filler injection is among the most popular nonsurgical aesthetic procedures worldwide. Though relatively noninvasive, filler injection can lead to severe vascular adverse events. Even though the incidence is rare, it may cause devastating and irreversible outcomes. A Swiss cheese model has been widely applied for risk analysis and management approach in medical field. AIMS: In this review article, we adopt the Swiss cheese model and create a structured approach to prevent severe vascular complications caused by filler injections. METHODS: We reviewed the current literature regarding the knowledge and techniques of preventing vascular adverse events in the filler injection. RESULTS: We propose four structured strategies in this model to reduce the risk of severe vascular adverse events of filler injections, including clinical facial anatomy, safe filler injection principles, real time imaging and auxiliary instruments, and implication of checklist. CONCLUSION: This review provides clinicians a structured approach before and during the filler injection procedure to reduce the risk of vascular adverse events and improve its safety and outcome.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Humans , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Injections , Face , Esthetics
6.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(1): 12, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38038780

ABSTRACT

Relevant evidence regarding the risk of incident breast cancer in patients with psoriasis is lacking. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the risk of breast cancer in patients with psoriasis. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to December 31, 2021, for relevant cohort studies without language limitations. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to determine the quality of the selected papers. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to obtain the pooled hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for breast cancer in relation to psoriasis. We also performed a subgroup analysis of patients with mild-to-moderate-to-severe psoriasis. We included seven cohort studies, all of which were considered high quality, and three of them provided data for meta-analysis. The risk for breast cancer did not increase among patients with psoriasis (pooled HR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.97-1.27; I2 = 67%). In the subgroup analysis, the risk for breast cancer did not significantly increase among patients with mild psoriasis (pooled HR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12; I2 = 6%), and the risk for breast cancer did not significantly increase among those with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (pooled HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.72-1.28; I2 = 0%). Patients with mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis are not at an elevated risk of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Psoriasis , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Patients
8.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 16(9)2023 Sep 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37765136

ABSTRACT

Higher rates of postoperative complications have been found in preoperative chronic steroid users. However, the effects of preoperative chronic steroid use on outcomes in orthopedic surgery were unclear. We performed a systematic review of cohort studies examining the effects of chronic steroid use on postoperative outcomes following orthopedic surgery and searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL through 29 April 2023. We included 17 studies with 1,546,562 patients. No increase in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-3.09) and composite thromboembolic events (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 0.99-2.63) but increases in 30-day overall complications (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.75), wound dehiscence (aOR 2.91, 95% CI 1.49-5.66), infectious complications (any infection (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.44-1.80), sepsis (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.34-3.21), superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.03-2.89) and deep SSI (aOR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.05)), re-admission (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.48-1.77), both 30-day (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.59) and 1-year re-operation (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.92), pulmonary embolism (aOR 5.94, 95% CI 1.52-23.29), and deep vein thrombosis (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.24-3.46) were detected in preoperative steroid users. An increased risk of adverse outcomes following orthopedic surgery in chronic steroid users was found.

9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 8: CD002292, 2023 08 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37572360

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease. Oral steroids are the standard treatment. We have updated this review, which was first published in 2002, because several new treatments have since been tried. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of treatments for bullous pemphigoid. SEARCH METHODS: We updated searches of the following databases to November 2021: Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We searched five trial databases to January 2022, and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs of treatments for immunofluorescence-confirmed bullous pemphigoid. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors, working independently, evaluated the studies against the review's inclusion criteria and extracted data from included studies. Using GRADE methodology, we assessed the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in each comparison. Our primary outcomes were healing of skin lesions and mortality. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 14 RCTs (1442 participants). The main treatment modalities assessed were oral steroids, topical steroids, and the oral anti-inflammatory antibiotic doxycycline. Most studies reported mortality but adverse events and quality of life were not well reported. We decided to look at the primary outcomes 'disease control' and 'mortality'. Almost all studies investigated different comparisons; two studies were placebo-controlled. The results are therefore based on a single study for each comparison except azathioprine. Most studies involved only small numbers of participants. We assessed the risk of bias for all key outcomes as having 'some concerns' or high risk, due to missing data, inappropriate analysis, or insufficient information. Clobetasol propionate cream versus oral prednisone Compared to oral prednisone, clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body probably increases skin healing at day 21 (risk ratio (RR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.13; 1 study, 341 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Skin healing at 21 days was seen in 99.8% of participants assigned to clobetasol and 92.4% of participants assigned to prednisone. Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body compared to oral prednisone may reduce mortality at one year (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.01; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Death occurred in 26.5% (45/170) of participants assigned to clobetasol and 36.3% (62/171) of participants assigned to oral prednisone. This study did not measure quality of life. Clobetasol propionate cream may reduce risk of severe complications by day 21 compared with oral prednisone (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.86; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Mild clobetasol propionate cream regimen (10 to 30 g/day) versus standard clobetasol propionate cream regimen (40 g/day) A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen probably does not change skin healing at day 21 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.03; 1 study, 312 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Both groups showed complete healing of lesions at day 21 in 98% participants. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change mortality at one year (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.32; 1 study, 312 participants; low-certainty evidence), which occurred in 118/312 (37.9%) participants. This study did not measure quality of life. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change adverse events at one year (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14; 1 study, 309 participants; low-certainty evidence). Doxycycline versus prednisolone Compared to prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day), doxycycline (200 mg/day) induces less skin healing at six weeks (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92; 1 study, 213 participants; high-certainty evidence). Complete skin healing was reported in 73.8% of participants assigned to doxycycline and 91.1% assigned to prednisolone. Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably decreases mortality at one year (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 14; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Mortality occurred in 2.4% (3/132) of participants with doxycycline and 9.7% (11/121) with prednisolone. Compared to prednisolone, doxycycline improved quality of life at one year (mean difference 1.8 points lower, which is more favourable on the Dermatology Life Quality Index, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.58 lower; 1 study, 234 participants; high-certainty evidence). Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably reduces severe or life-threatening treatment-related adverse events at one year (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Prednisone plus azathioprine versus prednisone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus prednisone compared to prednisone alone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from two trials (98 participants). These studies did not measure quality of life. Adverse events were reported in a total of 20/48 (42%) participants assigned to azathioprine plus prednisone and 15/44 (34%) participants assigned to prednisone. Nicotinamide plus tetracycline versus prednisone It is unclear whether nicotinamide plus tetracycline compared to prednisone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (18 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. Fewer adverse events were reported in the nicotinamide group. Methylprednisolone plus azathioprine versus methylprednisolone plus dapsone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus methylprednisolone compared to dapsone plus methylprednisolone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (54 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. A total of 18 adverse events were reported in the azathioprine group and 13 in the dapsone group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as, and may cause less mortality than, oral prednisone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Lower-dose clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as standard-dose clobetasol propionate cream and has similar mortality. Doxycycline is less effective but causes less mortality than prednisolone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Other treatments need further investigation.


Subject(s)
Azathioprine , Pemphigoid, Bullous , Humans , Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Clobetasol/therapeutic use , Pemphigoid, Bullous/drug therapy , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Dapsone/therapeutic use , Niacinamide/therapeutic use
10.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(17): e029740, 2023 09 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37642024

ABSTRACT

Background Bullous pemphigoid (BP) and pemphigus vulgaris (PV) share similar pathophysiology with venous thromboembolism (VTE) involving platelet activation, immune dysregulation, and systemic inflammation. Nevertheless, their associations have not been well established. Methods and Results To examine the risk of incident VTE among patients with BP or PV, we performed a nationwide cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and enrolled 12 162 adults with BP or PV and 12 162 controls. A Cox regression model considering stabilized inverse probability weighting was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) for incident VTE associated with BP or PV. To consolidate the findings, a meta-analysis that incorporated results from the present cohort study with previous literature was also conducted. Compared with controls, patients with BP or PV had an increased risk for incident VTE (HR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.55-2.26]; P<0.001). The incidence of VTE was 6.47 and 2.20 per 1000 person-years in the BP and PV cohorts, respectively. The risk for incident VTE significantly increased among patients with BP (HR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.52-2.24]; P<0.001) and PV (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.02-3.91]; P=0.04). In the meta-analysis of 8 studies including ours, BP and PV were associated with an increased risk for incident VTE (pooled relative risk, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.82-2.62]; P<0.001). Conclusions BP and PV are associated with an increased risk for VTE. Preventive approaches and cardiovascular evaluation should be considered particularly for patients with BP or PV with concomitant risk factors such as hospitalization or immobilization.


Subject(s)
Pemphigoid, Bullous , Pemphigus , Venous Thromboembolism , Adult , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Pemphigoid, Bullous/epidemiology , Pemphigus/diagnosis , Pemphigus/epidemiology , Risk Factors
11.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(10): 3213-3220.e11, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37451615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management of urticaria can be optimized with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, the quality of recent urticaria CPGs remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify and appraise urticaria CPGs worldwide published in the last 5 years. METHODS: A search for relevant urticaria CPGs was conducted between January 1, 2017, and May 31, 2022, using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Evidence Search, Guidelines International Network, ECRI Guidelines Trust, Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines, Trip Medical Database, and DynaMed. The included CPGs were critically appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, Lenzer et al's red flags, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria of trustworthiness. RESULTS: We included 21 urticaria CPGs. Most guidelines reviewed treatment recommendations of chronic spontaneous urticaria. The majority of guidelines were from European and Asian countries with high and high-middle sociodemographic index, written in English, and openly accessible. Seventeen guidelines (81%) had at least 1 AGREE II domain rated poor quality. Applicability, rigor of development, and stakeholder involvement were the 3 AGREE II domains that scored the lowest across guidelines. Appraisal with Lenzer et al's red flags showed that 18 guidelines (86%) raised at least 1 red flag indicating potential bias. The top 3 domains raising red flags were: no inclusion of nonphysician experts/patient representative/community stakeholders, no or limited involvement of a methodologist in the evaluation of evidence, and lack of external review. Based on IOM's criteria of trustworthiness, 20 guidelines (95%) had 1 or more criteria that did not meet best practice standards. The 3 domains with the highest number of best practice standards not met were updating procedures, rating strength of recommendations, and external review. Guidelines scored highest for the AGREE II domains of defining scope and purpose and clarity of presentation, and had the most fully met IOM's best practice standard for articulation of recommendations. However, only 1 urticaria CPG by NICE was identified as rigorously developed across all 3 appraisal tools. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of urticaria CPGs in the last 5 years varied widely. Only the NICE urticaria guideline consistently demonstrated excellent quality, high trustworthiness, and low risk of bias. Use of a rigorous framework to rate certainty of evidence and grade strength of recommendation, involvement of methodologists, stakeholder engagement with external review, and clear guidance for updating can help improve the quality of future CPGs.


Subject(s)
Dermatology , Urticaria , Humans , Australia , Databases, Factual , Stakeholder Participation , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/therapy
12.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(7): 1451-1454, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37347824

ABSTRACT

Nannizzia polymorpha is a dermatophyte that rarely infects humans. We describe 2 case-patients from Asia who had an inflammatory type of tinea capitis and tinea manuum caused by infection with this fungus. The diagnosis was confirmed on the basis of the morphologic and molecular characteristics of the microorganism.


Subject(s)
Arthrodermataceae , Hand Dermatoses , Tinea , Humans , Tinea/diagnosis , Tinea/drug therapy , Tinea/microbiology , Skin/microbiology , Asia
14.
JAMA Dermatol ; 159(7): 720-727, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37256633

ABSTRACT

Importance: The associations of atopic dermatitis (AD) with multiple cardiovascular comorbidities have been investigated because of its pathomechanisms regarding chronic systemic inflammation and potential vascular effects. Nevertheless, the association between AD and incident venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adulthood is largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate the association of AD with incident VTE. Objective: To examine the risk of incident VTE among patients with AD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based nationwide cohort study included adults 20 years or older (adults with AD newly diagnosed between 2003 and 2017 and matched controls) from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with AD were subgrouped according to the severity of the disease. A Cox regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for VTE. Stratified analyses according to age and sex, and a sensitivity analysis excluding systemic steroid users were performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident VTE associated with AD. Results: This analysis included a total of 284 858 participants, with 142 429 participants each in the AD (mean [SD] age, 44.9 [18.3] years; 78 213 women) and non-AD cohorts (mean [SD] age, 44.1 [18.1] years; 79 636 women). During the follow-up, 1066 patients (0.7%) in the AD cohort and 829 patients (0.6%) in the non-AD cohort developed VTE, with incidence rates of 1.05 and 0.82 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Adults with AD had a significantly increased risk of incident VTE (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40) compared with adults without AD. Individual outcome analyses suggested that AD was associated with higher risks of deep vein thrombosis (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14-1.40) and pulmonary embolism (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.57). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that AD in adulthood is associated with an increased risk of VTE; however, the absolute risk difference of VTE between adults with and without AD appears small. Nevertheless, cardiovascular examination and imperative management may be considered for adults with AD who present with symptoms suggestive of VTE. Future research is warranted to elucidate the pathophysiology underlying the association between AD and VTE.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Incidence
15.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 27(4): 330-339, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37231542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relation between psoriasis and hearing loss has been unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of psoriasis with hearing loss. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase on 12th November 2022 for studies on the association between psoriasis and hearing loss. We conducted a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate pooled mean difference (MD) in the pure tone thresholds, pooled odds ratio for sensorineural hearing loss, and pooled hazard ratio for sudden sensorineural hearing loss related to psoriasis. RESULTS: We included 12 case-control/cross-sectional and 3 cohort studies with 202,683 subjects. Psoriasis was associated with hearing loss at 500 Hz (pooled MD 2.21, 95% CI (CI) 0.13 to 4.29), 1000 Hz (pooled MD 2.97, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.93), 2000 Hz (pooled MD 5.13, 95% CI 2.45 to 7.82), 4000 Hz (pooled MD 9.3, 95% CI 5.1 to 13.51), and 6000 Hz (pooled MD 11.04, 95% CI 5.05 to 17.03). Patients with psoriasis had increased odds for sensorineural hearing loss (pooled odds ratio 3.85, 95% CI 1.07-13.9) and risk for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (pooled hazard ratio 1.45; 95% CI 1.22-1.71). CONCLUSION: Psoriasis is associated with hearing loss, especially at high frequencies.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Psoriasis , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/epidemiology
16.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 24(5): 721-730, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37010780

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cases of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) following isotretinoin use have been reported previously, but whether isotretinoin exposure is associated with IBD has been unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate whether isotretinoin use is associated with IBD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception to January 27, 2023 for relevant case-control and cohort studies. Our outcome was the pooled odds ratio (OR) for IBD and its two subtypes (Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis) in relation to isotretinoin exposure. We conducted a random-effects model meta-analysis and a sensitivity analysis by excluding low-quality studies. A subgroup analysis was undertaken by including studies considering antibiotic use. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to test the robustness of the conclusiveness of our results. RESULTS: We included eight studies (four case-control and four cohort studies) with a total of 2,522,422 participants. The meta-analysis found no increased odds for IBD among patients receiving isotretinoin (OR 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.27). Nor did the meta-analysis find increased odds for either Crohn disease (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.65-1.15) or ulcerative colitis (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.94-1.73) associated with isotretinoin exposure. The sensitivity and subgroup analyses produced similar results. In TSA, the Z-curve reached the futility boundaries when using relative risk reduction thresholds ranging from 5% to 15%. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis with TSA found no evidence of an association of isotretinoin use with IBD. Isotretinoin should not be withheld because of unnecessary concerns for the development of IBD. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO: CRD42022298886.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Isotretinoin/adverse effects , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/epidemiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/chemically induced , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/chemically induced , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Odds Ratio
17.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21(5): 493-502, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37066816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between psoriasis and migraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant observational studies from their respective inception to May 1, 2022. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to calculate the risk estimates quantifying the associations between psoriasis and migraine. We also performed a sensitivity analysis by including only studies with adjusted risk estimates and a subgroup analysis according to the severity of psoriasis. RESULTS: We included 9 studies with 6,742,075 participants. The meta-analysis illustrated increased odds for prevalent migraine among patients with psoriasis (pooled OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.26-2.28) and increased odds for prevalent psoriasis among those with migraine (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.32-3.67). A subgroup analysis of cohort studies demonstrated an increasingly higher risk of incident migraine in patients with mild psoriasis and severe psoriasis (IRR being 1.37 (95% CI 1.30-1.44) and 1.55 (95% CI 1.29-1.86), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed significant bidirectional associations between migraine and psoriasis. Greater severity of psoriasis appears to be associated with a higher risk of developing migraine. Clinicians should evaluate symptoms of migraine in patients with psoriasis and provide proper treatments.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Psoriasis , Humans , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Migraine Disorders/complications , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Psoriasis/complications , Cohort Studies
18.
Dermatology ; 239(4): 523-532, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37094565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated melanocyte-related pathogenesis in alopecia areata (AA) may cause sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, the relation between AA and SNHL has been unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate this association between AA and SNHL. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and searched MEDLINE and Embase on July 25, 2022, for cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies that examined the association of AA with SNHL. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate their risk of bias. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to obtain the mean differences in frequency-specific hearing thresholds between AA patients and age-matched healthy controls and the pooled odds ratio for SNHL in relation to AA. RESULTS: We included 5 case-control studies and 1 cohort study, with none of them rated with high risk of biases. The meta-analysis showed AA patients had significantly higher mean differences in pure-tone hearing thresholds at 4,000 Hz and 12,000-12,500 Hz. The meta-analysis also found increased odds for SNHL among patients with AA (OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 2.06-4.89; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: AA is associated with an increase of SNHL, especially at high frequencies. Otologic consultation may be indicated if AA patients present with hearing loss or tinnitus.


Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Humans , Alopecia Areata/complications , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications
19.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 122(6): 442-457, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36347733

ABSTRACT

Psoriatic disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder with skin and joint manifestations. Due to the persistent inflammatory state exhibited by patients with psoriasis, multiple systemic comorbidities occur more frequently in patients with psoriasis than in the general population, and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) diseases is significantly increased. As the pathophysiology of psoriatic disease is becoming better understood, the sharing of underlying pathogenic mechanisms between psoriatic and CV diseases is becoming increasingly apparent. Consequently, careful attention to CV comorbidities that already exist or may potentially develop is needed in the management of patients with psoriasis, particularly in the screening and primary prevention of CV disease and in treatment selection due to potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Furthermore, as the use of effective biologic therapy and more aggressive oral systemic treatment for psoriatic disease is increasing, consideration of the potential positive and negative effects of oral and biologic treatment on CV disease is warranted. To improve outcomes and quality of care for patients with psoriasis, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association, the Taiwanese Association for Psoriasis and Skin Immunology, and the Taiwan Society of Cardiology established a Task Force of 20 clinicians from the fields of dermatology, cardiology, and rheumatology to jointly develop consensus expert recommendations for the management of patients with psoriatic disease with attention to CV comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic , Cardiology , Cardiovascular Diseases , Psoriasis , Humans , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Taiwan/epidemiology , Consensus , Psoriasis/therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...