Robotic-assisted proctosigmoidectomy for Hirschsprung's disease: A multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is a cutting-edge minimally invasive technique that overcomes many shortcomings of laparoscopic techniques, yet few studies have evaluated the use of robotic surgery to treat Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR). AIM: To analyze the feasibility and medium-term outcomes of robotic-assisted proctosigmoidectomy (RAPS) with sphincter- and nerve-sparing surgery in HSCR patients. METHODS: From July 2015 to January 2022, 156 rectosigmoid HSCR patients were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study. Their sphincters and nerves were spared by dissecting the rectum completely from the pelvic cavity outside the longitudinal muscle of the rectum and then performing transanal Soave pull-through procedures. Surgical outcomes and continence function were analyzed. RESULTS: No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. The median age at surgery was 9.50 months, and the length of the removed bowel was 15.50 ± 5.23 cm. The total operation time, console time, and anal traction time were 155.22 ± 16.77, 58.01 ± 7.71, and 45.28 ± 8.15 min. There were 25 complications within 30 d and 48 post-30-d complications. For children aged ≥ 4 years, the bowel function score (BFS) was 17.32 ± 2.63, and 90.91% of patients showed moderate-to-good bowel function. The postoperative fecal continence (POFC) score was 10.95 ± 1.04 at 4 years of age, 11.48 ± 0.72 at 5 years of age, and 11.94 ± 0.81 at 6 years of age, showing a promising annual trend. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, BFS, and POFC scores related to age at surgery being ≤ 3 mo or > 3 mo. CONCLUSION: RAPS is a safe and effective alternative for treating HSCR in children of all ages; it offers the advantage of further minimizing damage to sphincters and perirectal nerves and thus providing better continence function.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cyst in children: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Most commonly, cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy reconstruction are the optimal treatment for choledochal cysts (CC). Robotic surgery (RS) is being conducted with increasing frequency to treat CC. It is unclear whether RS can overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and improve the prognosis of patients. In terms of efficacy, evidence concerning which minimally invasive surgery is preferred is, however, sparse. Our objective is to further compare the efficacy of RS and LS in children with CC and draw a useful clinical conclusion. METHODS: Studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified from a series of databases, consisting of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and their reference list of articles up to May 2022. Eligible articles comprised at least five objects that were younger than 18 years of age and the language was limited to English. Two authors independently evaluated selected studies and extracted data for analysis. RESULTS: Forty studies were selected for analysis, with thirty-six reporting data on LS and eight containing data on RS. The pooled conversion rate and pooled postoperative complication rate of RS were lower than those of LS, but none of them was statistically significant. Moreover, comparisons of the following detailed postoperative complication rates were not statistically significant, such as intestinal obstruction or ileus, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic or bile leakage, and anastomotic stenosis. However, the intraoperative blood loss and the postoperative hospital stay in RS group were significantly lower than those in LS group. CONCLUSIONS: RS is a safe and feasible option for children with CC. Further studies with more cases, long-term efficacy and health economics analysis are needed to confirm whether RS is more advantageous.

Outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted choledochal cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy in children.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is becoming more popular because of the excellent performance in anastomosis and knot tying, especially in complex surgical procedures such as hepaticojejunostomy. As for operative time and costs, laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) seem to be more advantageous. To date, there are only limited studies focusing on the comparison between RAS and LAS. This study aims to investigate differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic approaches. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study of 140 patients operated via mini-invasive approaches for choledochal cyst (CC) excision and hepaticojejunostomy at the Wuhan Union Hospital from Jun 2014 to Dec 2019. A multivariable logistic regression model for odds to having complications was built. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in age, sex, follow-up time, and Todani modification of the Alonso-Lej classification distribution. Patients undergoing RAS had longer overall operative time, shorter cyst excision time, shorter hepaticojejunostomy time, less estimated blood loss, a smaller postoperative high fever rate, shorter postoperative LOS, and a lower postoperative complication rate. Moreover, the intraoperative anatomy structures were more explicit in group RAS, such as the exposure of left or right hepatic duct opening and intrapancreatic bile duct. Multivariable logistic regression showed that longer hepaticojejunostomy time was the only risk factor of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted CC excision and hepaticojejunostomy was associated with better intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes when compared to laparoscopic-assisted surgery.

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic plication for diaphragmatic eventration.

BACKGROUND: Though conventional thoracoscopic plication is a favorable option of diaphragmatic eventration (DE), ribs limited the movement of trocars, making it difficult to suturing, knot-tying and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate delicate surgical maneuvers and suturing time for the management of DE in robot-assisted thoracoscopic plication (RATP). METHODS: From January 2015 to November 2019, 20 patients (14 males; mean age: 10.5 ±â€¯5.2 months; mean weight: 8.6 ±â€¯4.5 kg) who underwent diaphragmatic plication for DE were reviewed at our institution. There were 13 patients with congenital diaphragmatic eventration and 7 patients with acquired diaphragm eventration after congenital heart surgery. RATP was performed on 9 patients (3 on the left and 6 on the right), and conventional thoracoscopic plication (CTP) was applied to 11 patients (5 on the left and 6 on the right). Demographics, the suturing time and complications were respectively evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference between 2 groups with respect to gender, age at surgery and weight (p > 0.05). No conversion to thoracotomy was needed. The suturing time in RATP group was shorter than CTP group (27.7 ±â€¯3.4 min vs 48.1 ±â€¯4.2 min, p < 0.001). One patient (9.09%) experienced recurrence in CTP group and none was found in RATP group. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic plication with robot-assisted thoracoscopy or conventional thoracoscopy in DE has minimally invasive and good effect on children. RATP overcome the intercostal limitations to complete delicate suturing and free knot-tying, and has better ergonomics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Transumbilical enterostomy for Hirschsprung's disease with a two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through procedure.

BACKGROUND: A one-stage laparoscopic operation has recently been considered a favorable option for the management of patients with Hirschsprung's disease (HD) due to its superior cosmetic results. One-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for the treatment of rectosigmoid HD has been widely used in newborns without complications. However, enterostomy is required in some HD cases for enterocolitis and dilated colon. Our transumbilical enterostomy (TUE) and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty were effective and achieved a similar cosmetic effect to one-stage laparoscopy on the abdominal wall in patients with anorectal malformation, but the effect in patients with HD is unclear. AIM: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and cosmetic results of TUE in two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD. METHODS: From June 2013 to June 2018, 53 patients (40 boys, 13 girls; mean age at enterostomy: 5.5 ± 2.2 mo) who underwent enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through for HD with stoma closure were reviewed at our institution. Two enterostomy approaches were used: TUE in 24 patients, and conventional abdominal enterostomy (CAE) in 29 patients. Eleven patients with rectosigmoid HD had severe preoperative enterocolitis or a dilated colon. 26 patients had long-segment HD, and 16 patients had total colonic aganglionosis (TCA). The patients with left-sided HD underwent the two-stage laparoscopic Soave procedure, and the patients with right-sided HD and TCA underwent the laparoscopic Duhamel procedure. Demographics, enterostomy operative time, complications and cosmetic results were respectively evaluated. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups with respect to gender, age at enterostomy, weight and clinical type (P > 0.05). No conversion to open technique was required. Two patients experienced episodes of stomal mucosal prolapse in the TUE group and 1 patient in the CAE group (8.33% vs 3.45%, P > 0.05). No parastomal hernia was observed in either of the two groups. Wound infection at the stoma was seen in 1 case in the TUE group, and 2 cases in the CAE group (4.17% vs 6.90%, P > 0.05). No obstruction was noted in any of the patients in the TUE group, whereas obstruction was found in 1 patient in the CAE group. Enterocolitis was observed in 3 and 5 patients in the TUE and CAE group, respectively (12.50% vs 17.24%, P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the TUE group and CAE group in terms of the incidence of soiling and constipation (P > 0.05). The cosmetic result using the scar score in the TUE group was better than that in the CAE group (6.83 ± 0.96 vs 13.32 ± 1.57, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TUE is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of HD, and the staged enterostomy and two-stage laparoscopy-assisted pull-through achieved a similar cosmetic effect to the one-stage laparoscopic procedure.

Effect of virtual reality on balance and gait ability in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality interventions for improving balance and gait in people with Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Databases of MEDLINE, Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PEDro, Web of Science and China Biology Medicine disc were searched from their inception up to 1 March 2019. Two reviewers individually appraised literatures for inclusion, extracted data and evaluated trial quality. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with a median PEDro score of 6.4 and involving 419 participants were included. This review first demonstrated significant improvements in Berg Balance Scale (mean difference = 2.69; 95% confidence interval = 1.37 to 4.02; p < 0.0001), Timed Up and Go Test (mean difference = -2.86; 95% confidence interval = -5.60 to -0.12; p = 0.04) and stride length (mean difference = 9.65; 95% confidence interval = 4.31 to 14.98; p = 0.0004) in Parkinson patients who received virtual reality compared with controls. However, there was no significant difference in gait velocity and walk distance. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis supports the use of virtual reality to enhance the balance of patients with Parkinson's disease. However, the review does not find any definite effect upon gait by the use of virtual reality.