Investigation of treadmill and overground running: implications for the measurement of oxygen cost in children with developmental coordination disorder.

Differences in the kinematics and kinetics of overground running have been reported between boys with and without developmental coordination disorder (DCD). This study compared the kinematics of overground and treadmill running in children with and without DCD to determine whether any differences in technique are maintained, as this may influence the outcome of laboratory treadmill studies of running economy in this population. Nine boys with DCD (10.3 ± 1.1 year) and 10 typically developing (TD) controls (9.7 ± 1 year) ran on a treadmill and overground at a matched velocity (8.8 ± 0.9 km/h). Kinematic data of the trunk and lower limb were obtained for both conditions using a 12-camera Vicon MX system. Both groups displayed an increase in stance time (p < 0.001), shorter stride length (p < 0.001), higher cadence (p < 0.001) and reduced ankle plantar flexion immediately after toe-off (p < 0.05) when running on the treadmill compared with overground. The DCD group had longer stance time (p < 0.009) and decreased knee flexion at mid-swing (p = 0.04) while running overground compared to their peers, but these differences were maintained when running on the treadmill. Treadmill running improved ankle joint symmetry in the DCD group compared with running overground (p = 0.019). Overall, these findings suggest that there are limited differences in joint kinematics and lower limb symmetry between overground and treadmill running in this population. Accordingly, laboratory studies of treadmill running in children with DCD are likely representative of the energy demands of running.

A comparison of the oxygen cost and physiological responses to running in children with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder.

The aim of this study was to compare the oxygen cost of running in boys with and without Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). Fourteen boys with DCD (9.1 ± 1.4 yr) and 16 typically developing (TD) controls (9.4 ± 1.3 yr) were tested on two separate occasions at least a week apart. On the first visit, motor proficiency, body composition and maximal aerobic capacity were established. On the second visit, oxygen consumption was determined via indirect calorimetry while participants ran at three submaximal speeds (7.2 km/h, 8.0 km/h and 8.8 km/h) on a motorised treadmill for 4 min each. Additional physiological responses such as blood lactate, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), heart rate, salivary alpha amylase and pain threshold were monitored at baseline and after each submaximal effort. Although there were no differences in the oxygen cost of running at all three speeds, the boys with DCD had higher blood lactate concentration (7.2 km/h, p=0.05; 8.0 km/h p=0.019), heart rate (p ≤ 0.001), RER (8.0 km/h, p=0.019; 8.8 km/h, p=0.001), salivary alpha amylase (8.0 km/h, p=0.023; 8.8 km/h, p=0.020) and a lower pain threshold (p<0.01). The higher overall metabolic cost of running in boys with DCD as indicated by the higher RER, heart rate and blood lactate concentrations, together with the higher levels of sympathoadrenal medullary activity and sensitivity to pain, may be deterring factors for participation in physical activity in this population.

A comparison of running kinematics and kinetics in children with and without developmental coordination disorder.

The aim of this study was to compare running gait in children with and without developmental coordination disorder (DCD). Fourteen boys with DCD (9.5 ± 1 yr) and 14 typically developing (TD) controls (9.6 ± 1 yr) ran at a velocity of 2.44 ± 0.25 m/s along a 15m track, with kinematic and kinetic data of the trunk and lower limb obtained for three cycles of each limb using a 12-camera Vicon MX system and AMTI force plate. Although features of the kinematic and kinetic trajectories were similar between groups, the DCD group displayed decreased peak knee extension compared with the TD group prior to initial foot contact (p = 0.016). Furthermore, the DCD group displayed increased variability in sagittal plane kinematics at the hip and ankle during toe off compared with the TD group. Kinetic analysis revealed that children with DCD displayed significantly reduced knee extensor moments during the stance phase of the running cycle (p = 0.033). Consequently, peak knee power absorption and ankle power generation was significantly lower in the DCD group (p = 0.041; p = 0.017). Furthermore, there was a trend for children with DCD to have shorter strides (p = 0.052, ES = 0.499) and a longer stance period than the TD controls (p=0.06, ES = 0.729). These differences may have implications for the economy of running and subsequently the planning of targeted intervention programs to improve running gait in children with DCD.