Virtual monitoring for stable chronic hepatitis B patients does not reduce adherence to medications: A randomised controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains common in endemic regions, causing significant healthcare burden. Patients with CHB may need to be adherent to nucleoside analogue (NA) for a long period of time to prevent complications. This study aims to investigate the safety, efficacy and patient experience of a virtual monitoring clinic (VMC) in monitoring stable patients taking NA for CHB. METHODS: Patients on NA and regular follow-up were randomised to either VMC alternating with doctors' clinic visit or to a control group in which they continued standard follow-up by doctors. Therapy adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) for NA therapy, incidence of virological breakthrough and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development at two years of follow-up. Patient acceptance was measured on a Likert scale of 1-10. RESULTS: A total 192 patients completed follow-up: 94 and 98 patients in the VMC and control groups, respectively. Mean age was 60.6 ± 10.8 years, with 95.3% Chinese ethnicity and 64.1% males. Age, gender, race, educational, employment and financial status were similar in both groups. Upon study completion, the majority of patients - 76 (80.9%) in VMC group and 74 (75.5%) in control group - had MPR ≥0.8; 88.8% were satisfied and rated VMC better than a traditional follow-up clinic with doctors only. More than 85% of patients rated ≥8/10 on the Likert scale for VMC, and preferred VMC over traditional clinic visits. Clinical outcomes observed were HCC development in one (1.1%) in the VMC group and four (4.1%) in the control group (p = 0.369). Two (2.1%) and one (1.0%) virological breakthroughs were observed in the VMC and control groups, respectively (p = 0.615). No incidence of HCC or abnormal blood tests were missed in the VMC arm. DISCUSSION: VMC is a viable and safe clinical model for monitoring stable CHB patients on NA therapy without compromising patients' adherence to medications and is preferred by patients.

Clinical validation of the chronic liver disease questionnaire for the Chinese population in Singapore.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Assessment of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) requires the use of validated instruments that are understood by patients in their native language. We previously translated the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire into the Singapore-Mandarin version (CLDQ-SG). This study aims to examine the internal consistency and validity of the CLDQ-SG in patients with CLD. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult patients with CLD seen in a tertiary center in Singapore who completed both the CLDQ-SG and Short Form Health Survey 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaires. Internal consistency of the CLDQ-SG was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Convergent and divergent validity of the SF-36v2 was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient, while discriminant validity was assessed using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test for trend. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to evaluate the factor structure of the CLDQ-SG. RESULTS: We enrolled 242 subjects (68.2% males, median age 67 years). Predominant etiology of CLD was chronic hepatitis B. Severity of CLD was divided into noncirrhotic (67.3%), compensated cirrhosis (24.0%), and decompensated cirrhosis (8.7%). Item convergent and discriminant validity of the CLDQ-SG was excellent, with 100% scaling success in all six domains. All domains exhibited good internal consistency, with Cronbach's α > 0.70. We observed a consistent trend of a reduction in mean CLDQ-SG score in the three groups reflecting the discriminant validity of the CLDQ-SG to assess changes in HRQOL in different severities of CLD. Factor analysis of the CLDQ-SG demonstrated an independent factor assessing sleep. CONCLUSION: The Singapore-Mandarin version of CLDQ-SG is a valid and reliable instrument to measure HRQOL in patients with CLD.