[Endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal non-variceal bleeding]. / Terapia endoscopica del sanguinamento non varicoso del tratto digestivo superiore.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic hemostasis is the method of choice for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate its effectiveness in routine endoscopic practice. METHODS: The records of all patients with gastrointestinal bleeding undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDS) at the Endoscopy Center of Ferrara in the last year were retrospectively evaluated. For each patient with peptic lesions, the following data were recorded: demographic characteristics, use of NSAIDs, co-morbidity, hemodynamic conditions, blood transfusions before EGDS, time between onset of symptoms and EGDS, endoscopic findings, method of endoscopic haemostasis carried out, Rockall score and outcome. If re-bleeding occurred, the data concerning the second therapeutic intervention were recorded as well. RESULTS: Seventy-six males and 45 females (age 34-92 years) entered the study. In 22% of cases no co-morbidity was present. Active bleeding was observed in 38% of cases, features consistent with recent bleeding in 54% of cases, and no sign of bleeding in 6.6% of cases. Peptic ulcer was observed in 89% of cases. Hemostasis was carried out in 81 patients (76 had adrenalin infiltration, 2 had argon plasma coagulator [APC], and 3 had both treatments); 26 patients had re-bleeding. The probability of re-bleeding was related to female gender (p<0.05; OR: 3.74), time between onset of symptoms and EGDS >24 hours (p<0.01; OR: 8.67), and presence of non-ulcer peptic pathology (p<0.05; OR: 0.15). Seven re-bleeding patients underwent surgery, 19 had endoscopic treatment. In 11 of these patients second hemostasis was resolutive, 8 bled again. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic lesions is effective also in routine clinical practice. Adrenalin infiltration is safe, easy to perform, cheap and repeatable, and in our opinion it should be considered the technique of first choice in endoscopic hemostasis.

Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a hospital-based study.

Aims of this study were to evaluate: (1) whether upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is used appropriately according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines in a hospital setting and (2) whether there is any relationship between appropriateness of UGE and the presence of lesions detected by endoscopy. Indications and endoscopic findings for 734 consecutive UGE performed in 697 inpatients were retrospectively evaluated using ASGE and BSG guidelines to determine appropriateness of referrals. UGE showing endoscopic findings that had direct therapeutic or prognostic consequences were classified as "positive"; the other UGEs were classified as "negative." In all, 46% of UGEs were "positive," 54% "negative," and 61.7% and 23.2% of UGEs were inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG guidelines, respectively (P < 0.001). The probability of finding a positive endoscopy was significantly higher in UGE rated as appropriate than in those rated as inappropriate on the basis of ASGE guidelines (P < 0.001), but not on the basis of BSG guidelines. Endoscopies rated as inappropriate according to ASGE and BSG criteria showed a positive finding in 37.3% and 42.3% of cases, respectively (not significant difference). Multivariate analysis showed that the positive finding is directly related to age (P < 0.05), male gender (P < 0.001), prior UGE (P < 0.05), hematemesis (P < 0.001), and inversely related with upper abdominal pain (P < 0.01) and dyspepsia (P < 0.05). In hospitalized patients, UGE is frequently used for inappropriate indications, according to both ASGE and BSG guidelines. However, the actual clinical usefulness of appropriateness criteria, such as those proposed by ASGE and BSG, is questionable, as their strict observance could lead to missing a large number of significant endoscopic findings.

Evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for detecting Helicobacter pylori in feces: a prospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: There is an increasing interest in noninvasive tests for detecting Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Unlike serological and urea breath tests, the possibility of searching for H. pylori in feces has been scarcely investigated. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the usefulness of a new enzyme immunoassay for detecting H. pylori antigens in feces, as a predictor of H. pylori status in the pre- and posttreatment settings. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four symptomatic, anti-H. pylori untreated patients (Group A) and 116 anti-H. pylori treated patients (Group B) underwent gastroscopy with biopsies of the antrum and corpus for histology (H) and rapid urease test (RUT). In the anti-H. pylori treated group, a 13C-urea breath test (UBT) was also performed. In Group A, H. pylori status was defined as positive or negative when both H and RUT gave concordant positive or negative results. In Group B, the patients were considered eradicated if all three tests were negative. A stool specimen was collected from all patients the day after gastroscopy, and tested by using an enzyme immunoassay commercial kit for detecting H. pylori antigens in feces (HpSAT). RESULTS: Eighty-five patients in Group A (55%) and 44 in Group B (38%) were H. pylori infected. On the whole, HpSAT showed a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 86%. In Group A and Group B, sensitivity and specificity were 94% versus 93%, and 90% versus 82%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HpSAT seems to be a reliable method for predicting H. pylori status in anti-H. pylori untreated patients. Conversely, the test appears less suitable to evaluate the outcome of the eradicating treatment. Consequently, it is likely to be accepted for the primary diagnosis of H. pylori status, particularly in dyspeptic young patients.

Histologic findings and Helicobacter pylori in duodenal biopsies.

We have studied the morphologic aspects of the duodenal bulb in relation to Helicobacter pylori infection in a large group of patients with endoscopically assessed duodenitis to learn more about the pathogenesis of nonspecific duodenitis (bulbitis) and to clarify the specific role of H. pylori. Eight duodenal biopsy specimens in the four quadrants of the first part of the bulb and four gastric antral biopsy specimens were taken in 208 patients. Specimens were fixed in formalin, or in glutaraldehyde, then slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff, and Alcian-Giemsa, and with toluidine blue for semithin sections. Duodenal histology revealed inflammation in 155 (74.5%) and H. pylori-like bacterial bodies in 153 (73.5%) of the patients; H. pylori infection in the gastric antrum was diagnosed in 173 (83.1%) of the patients. Distinguishing histologic aspects appeared to be related to the presence of H. pylori infection. We believe that the present histologic grading of duodenitis correlates better with the natural history of H. pylori infection in the duodenal bulb, and better fits the requirements of a modern classification than the classification commonly used in duodenitis. We conclude that the term H. pylori-linked bulbitis should be adopted as the proper term to identify the particular kind of duodenitis predisposing to peptic ulcer.

[Intra-oral cancer: immediate reconstruction using a free radial forearm flap]. / Le neoplasie del cavo orale: ricostruzione immediata con lembo libero antibrachiale.

The radial forearm flaps is ideal for intra-oral reconstruction. In that it offers thin, pliable, hairless skin to replace oral mucosa removed during wide resection in surgical treatment of cancer. The vascularity of the area allows considerable variation in design and size of the flap and offers the possibility of covering structures on different levels and, when bone is included, of carrying out immediate reconstruction of the mandible. The Authors used this flap in 24 patients for intra-oral reconstruction. The ages of the subjects ranged from 30 to 70 years. The arteries and the veins of the flap used for microsurgical anastomosis were radial arteries and superficial veins of the elbow. Neck vessels were superior arteries of the thyroid and jugularis externa vein. Operating time was slightly prolonged when compared to repair employing a myocutaneous island flap. This reconstruction method was completely successful in all 24 patients; in one patient a DIC partially compromised the vascularity of the flap on day 8. Morbidity was observed, resouled, however, with minor surgical procedures. Our results support the choice of this method for intraoral reconstruction.