Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(2): 728-736, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36734736

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare two positioning techniques of 12-French (Fr) thoracic drains in terms of efficacy, safety, and patient comfort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, non-randomized, competitive, non-inferiority study comparing the Seldinger vs. Trocar technique. The primary endpoint was an analysis of the factors that led to unsuccessful drainage positioning. Between the two groups, clinical variables, procedure times, pain, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in group 1 (Seldinger) and 45 in group 2 (Trocar). The mean procedural time was 7.93±3.02 min vs. 7.09±3.67 min, respectively (p: 0.33). The mean VAS for procedural pain was 2.22±1.47 vs. 2.80±1.88, p: 0.07, and the mean at day 2 was 3.6±1.2 in the SBWGD group vs. 2.7±1.1 in the Unico Group (p: 0.04). There was no difference in terms of complications, residual effusion, and pneumothorax at the first post-procedural chest X-ray. Four days after the procedure, the drain removal rate was 11.6% in group 1 vs. 25% in group 2 p: 0.063). The chest tube was removed after a mean period of 8.87±7.20 days after resolution of pleural effusion or tube dislodgement (7 cases in group 1 vs. 11 in group 2, p: 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The two techniques resulted in comparable pain and complication rates. Both drains are well-tolerated and efficient at draining pleural effusion, with very low rates of complications and failure. We recommend inserting a longer tube for patients who require chest drainage for an extended period of time.


Subject(s)
Pleural Effusion , Pneumothorax , Humans , Prospective Studies , Drainage/methods , Pleural Effusion/surgery , Pneumothorax/etiology , Chest Tubes/adverse effects , Surgical Instruments/adverse effects
2.
Clin Ter ; 173(5): 443-452, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36155731

ABSTRACT

Background: Climate change (CC) is the greatest threat to the health of the planet. The scientific community has established its connection to human activities and its role in emerging and premature diseases. Our study helps to understand how students of various backgrounds and academic fields retrieve information on CC and highlights the knowledge on the main causes and consequences of global warming and on the role of healthcare workers in the fight towards this threat. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed through an online questionnaire administered to university students between January and December 2020. Univariable analyses were performed, Chi-square was calculated and multivariable analysis was used to investigate the relationship between the answers and socio-demographic variables. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of less than 5%. Results: More than 80% of the sample correctly identifies as major consequences of CCs the increase in Earth's temperature (95.0%), melting of ice caps (89.4%), rising sea levels (81.8%), and the more frequent occurrence of climate-related natural disasters. Across courses of study, the frequency on how CC is addressed differs (p<0.001): 31.5% of the students from the medical field reported the topic to be taught in class, compared to 49.0% from humanities and 63.4% from science and technology. Conclusion: The study shows that medical students are less prepared and less aware of the consequences and causes of CC than students in other faculties. Since CC will play a role in every aspect of patients' lives, barriers to health care will have to be overcome through the knowledge and skills acquired during undergraduate courses.


Subject(s)
Climate Change , Students, Medical , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Ice , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Clin Ter ; 172(3): 211-214, 2021 May 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33956039

ABSTRACT

CONCLUSIONS: The present tool is adequate to investigate attitudes towards Smart Working among healthcare workers. BACKGROUND: During the most difficult phases of the Covid-19 he-alth emergency, when access to the usual work location was not allowed due to the constraints related to the pandemic, Smart Working enabled business continuity in the face of the ongoing health emergency. Mo-dern technology serves a new way of working, allowing workers to effectively manage their professional and personal spheres in a world that increasingly requires them to optimize their time. The main objective of this research is to validate a Smart Working questionnaire administered to healthcare workers. METHODS: The questionnaire, reported in Annex I, consisting of 30 questions and submitted electronically through Google Forms, was administered in Italian to healthcare personnel of the Teaching hospi-tal Umberto I and Sapienza University of Rome between September and October 2020. The questionnaire analyzed the characteristics of the sample and investigated the perception and attitude of healthcare personnel towards seven different aspects of Smart Working. A descriptive analysis of the sample examined and an internal consistency analysis was performed through the use of the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) program version 25.0. Cronbach's alpha statistical indicator, which measures reprodu-cibility over time, reliability, and homogeneity of questions, was used for the analysis. RESULTS: A total number of 53 health care providers answered the online questionnaire. The majority of the respondents were female (60.4%); 73.6% of respondents reported having a college degree or a higher educational level. The analysis showed an overall standardized Cronbach's Alpha of 0.709, which corresponds to a good reliability. In the items analysis, the alpha value ranged from a minimum of 0.652 to a maximum of 0.756.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Care Sector/organization & administration , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
4.
Clin Ter ; 170(4): e278-e284, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31304516

ABSTRACT

Numerous health risk behaviours have been identified as an issue in early adulthood, especially among university students, a particularly high-risk category for sexual and reproductive health. The aim of this study is to examine the condom use and its determinants among young adult in Italy. The hypothesis is that individuals' demographic characteristics (gender, faculty, to have a committed partner, to be resident) and the risk perception may play a role in condom use. The results indicate that the frequency of condom use is related to the magnitude of risk perception of certain STIs and to demographic characteristics. All the STI risks perception and the risk perception of unintended pregnancy are statistically significant associated with frequency of condom use (p<0.001). By contrast the frequency of condom use is not statistically significant associated with the following demographic characteristics: gender, faculty, to have a committed partner, to be resident. Furthermore association with age groups is observed (p=0.030). Findings suggest that universities have an opportunity to access young people's sexual health risk behaviours and at the same time to impact on sexual health promotion. University health educators and staff at student health centers could play an active role in educational campaigns.


Subject(s)
Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Safe Sex , Sexual Behavior , Sexual Partners , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Young Adult
7.
Clin Ter ; 168(2): e65-e71, 2017.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28383616

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bibliometrics is a science which evaluates the impact of the scientific work of a journal or of an author, using mathematical and statistical tools. Impact Factor (IF) is the first bibliometric parameter created, and after it many others have been progressively conceived in order to go beyond its limits. Currently bibliometric indexes are used for academic purposes, among them to evaluate the eligibility of a researcher to compete for the National Scientific Qualification, in order to access to competitive exams to become professor. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study is to identify the most relevant bibliometric indexes and to summarized their characteristics. METHODS: A revision of bibliometric indexes as been conducted, starting from the classic ones and completing with the most recent ones. RESULTS: The two most used bibliometric indexes are the IF, which measures the scientific impact of a periodical and bases on Web of Science citation database, and the h-index, which measures the impact of the scientific work of a researcher, basing on Scopus database. Besides them other indexes have been created more recently, such as the SCImago Journal Rank Indicator (SJR), the Source Normalised Impact per Paper (SNIP) and the CiteScore index. They are all based on Scopus database and evaluate, in different ways, the citational impact of a periodic. The i10-index instead is provided from Google Scholar database and allows to evaluate the impact of the scientific production of a researcher. Recently two softwares have been introduced: the first one, Publish or Perish, allows to evaluate the scientific work of a researcher, through the assessment of many indexes; the second one, Altmetric, measure the use in the Web of the academic papers, instead of measuring citations, by means of alternative metrics respect to the traditional ones. CONCLUSIONS: Each analized index shows advantages but also criticalities. Therefore the combined use of more than one indexes, citational and not, should be preferred, in order to correctly evaluate the work of reserchers and to finally improve the quality and the development of scientific research.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Journal Impact Factor , Periodicals as Topic , Publishing , Humans , Science
8.
Poult Sci ; 91(7): 1558-68, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22700499

ABSTRACT

Appropriate emergency disaster preparedness is a key priority for agricultural agencies to allow effective response to serious avian disease outbreaks. There is a need to develop rapid, humane, and safe depopulation techniques for poultry that are widely applicable across a range of farm settings. Whole barn depopulation with carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has been investigated as a humane and efficient means of killing large numbers of birds in the event of a reportable disease outbreak. It has also been considered as a method for depopulating barns containing end-of-lay hens, particularly when there is limited local slaughter and rendering capacity. Determining the best method of humanely killing large flocks of birds remains problematic and is being investigated by a coordinated international effort. While whole barn depopulation using CO(2) inhalation has been explored, physiologic responses of chickens have not been characterized in field settings and assessment of animal welfare is hampered without this information. In this study, 12 cull laying hens were surgically instrumented with telemetry transmitters to record electroencephalographs, electrocardiographs, body temperature, and activity during 2 large-scale field CO(2) euthanasia trials of end-of-lay hens. The day following surgery, instrumented hens were placed in barns with other birds, barns were sealed, and animals were killed by CO(2) inhalation delivered via a specially designed liquid CO(2) manifold. Instrumented birds were monitored by infrared thermography, and ambient temperature, CO(2), and O(2) concentrations were recorded. Results from these studies indicate that instrumented hens lost consciousness within 2 min of CO(2) levels reaching 18 to 20%. Mild to moderate head shaking, gasping, and 1 to 2 clonic muscle contractions were noted in hens before unconsciousness; however, brain death followed rapidly (<5 min). Evaluation of welfare costs and benefits suggest clear advantages over catching and transporting cull hens for slaughter. The financial costs with this method are greater, however, than those estimated for traditional slaughter techniques. Results of these studies are being used to develop national protocols for whole barn depopulation of hens by CO(2) inhalation.


Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide , Chickens , Euthanasia, Animal/methods , Animals , Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Body Temperature , Euthanasia, Animal/ethics , Female , Telemetry , Temperature , Time Factors , Videotape Recording
10.
Recenti Prog Med ; 81(1): 49-53, 1990 Jan.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2236828

ABSTRACT

A long-term administration of Indobufen, 400 mg daily, was evaluated in 57 patients with cardiovascular diseases. Aggregation waves induced by ADP, collagen and epinephrine showed a significant and persistent inhibition of platelet function. Minor side effects were observed and in 6 patients the drug was withdrawn: 4 patients began to experience gastric troubles, 1 patient had positive occult test for blood, 1 patient developed an allergic rush. Clinical evaluation and platelet aggregation study before starting indobufen and during the follow up period seem to be useful in the evaluation of effectiveness, safety, compliance and suitable daily dose.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Phenylbutyrates/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Female , Humans , Isoindoles , Male , Middle Aged , Phenylbutyrates/administration & dosage , Phenylbutyrates/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...