Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Melanoma Res ; 31(6): 586-588, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34620756

ABSTRACT

The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, such as dabrafenib and trametinib, respectively, is an established treatment option for patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma. With the wide adoption of these therapies, a range of cutaneous adverse effects has been reported. We describe the case of a 47-year-old woman with BRAFV600E-mutated stage IV melanoma treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for 30 months who presented to our attention for painful skin lesions that had been present on her limbs since the start of targeted therapy. We also observed vitiligo-like lesions on the extensor surface of both legs. Despite achieving a complete oncological response, the patient had to discontinue the treatment because of persisting fever, nausea and painful skin nodules that significantly impaired her quality of life. The recognition of cutaneous signs of efficacy of such drugs for advanced melanoma is of primary importance in order to identify patients with potential long-term clinical benefits.


Subject(s)
Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Oximes/therapeutic use , Panniculitis/etiology , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Vitiligo/etiology , Female , Humans , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Oximes/pharmacology , Panniculitis/pathology , Pyridones/pharmacology , Pyrimidinones/pharmacology , Vitiligo/pathology
2.
Oncologist ; 18(4): 379-80, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23580239

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib has proven survival benefits in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The viability of continuing sorafenib at a higher dosage in patients who experienced radiologic disease progression was investigated. METHODS: Patients who experienced disease progression while on sorafenib 400 mg twice daily were randomized to sorafenib 600 mg twice daily (n = 49) or best supportive care (n = 52). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Time to progression, overall survival, and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: The study did not meet its primary end point. The difference in PFS between the sorafenib arm (3.91 months) and the best supportive care arm (2.69 months) did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.086). Adverse events were mainly grade 1-2 and similar across both groups. In the sorafenib arm, the most frequent events were diarrhea (80%), weight loss (75%), fatigue (67%), hand-foot-skin reaction (49%), abdominal pain (37%), and stomatitis (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Escalated-dose sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC who progressed while on sorafenib, failed to provide any clinical benefit. Second-line treatment still remains an open issue to be explored in appropriate clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Niacinamide/administration & dosage , Niacinamide/adverse effects , Niacinamide/pharmacokinetics , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Phenylurea Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Sorafenib
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...