Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N J Med ; 90(3): 224-8, 1993 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8446300

ABSTRACT

Severity scoring systems are time consuming for physicians and other health professionals. In addition, they are unlikely to be used by resident physicians wishing to have a quantitative measure of a patient's severity. The authors describe a new critical care scoring system.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Severity of Illness Index , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 13(6): 1240-7, 1989 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2539403

ABSTRACT

A randomized, parallel, double-blind study was performed with lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, versus captopril, a shorter-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in the treatment of congestive heart failure. All patients were in New York Heart Association class II, III or IV and had remained symptomatic despite therapy with digoxin and diuretics. After a 4 to 14 day placebo baseline period, patients were randomized to receive either lisinopril, 5 mg orally once per day (n = 94), or captopril, 12.5 mg orally three times per day (n = 95), in addition to continuation of digoxin and diuretics. The dose of study drug could be doubled at 4 week intervals for a total of 12 weeks of double-blind therapy. The maximal dose was 20 mg once per day of lisinopril or 50 mg three times per day of captopril. The addition of either lisinopril or captopril to a regimen of diuretics or digoxin, or both, caused an increase in exercise duration as assessed on a motorized treadmill. When protocol violators were excluded, patients receiving lisinopril had a statistically greater increase in exercise duration than that of patients receiving captopril. In patients with renal impairment (serum creatinine greater than 1.6 mg/dl at baseline), lisinopril was superior to captopril in improving exercise duration. Lisinopril, but not captopril, increased left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with moderately to severely (less than 35%) decreased function (p less than 0.05). Improvement in functional capacity and quality of life, as assessed by the Yale Scale dyspnea/fatigue index, was significantly greater for the lisinopril group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Captopril/therapeutic use , Enalapril/analogs & derivatives , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Enalapril/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Lisinopril , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Random Allocation
3.
Chest ; 93(3): 592-4, 1988 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2830080

ABSTRACT

We have assessed right and left ventricular function by multigated radionuclide ventriculography in 12 consecutive patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) grouped according to the CDC classification system for HIV infection. Results were correlated with clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings. Clinical examination and chest x-ray films showed no evidence of acute cardiac or pulmonary pathology. Five patients had evidence of ventricular dysfunction by radionuclide ventriculography along with significant ECG abnormalities. Three patients had abnormal ECG findings with normal ejection fractions. Echocardiography showed no evidence of significant valvulopathy or pericardial disease except for one patient with fibrinous strands associated with the pericardium. Decreased ejection fractions did not correlate with disease classification, risk group or survival. This study suggests that a major percentage of AIDS patients have some evidence of cardiac abnormalities. We conclude that abnormal ECG findings in an AIDS patient should alert the clinician to possible underlying ventricular dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/physiopathology , Heart/physiopathology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/diagnosis , Adult , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Female , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radionuclide Imaging , Sodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m , Stroke Volume
4.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 9 Suppl 3: S82-8, 1987.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2442559

ABSTRACT

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition with captopril is accepted therapy for the treatment of symptomatic congestive heart failure. In this trial, we compared the new ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, to captopril during a 12-week randomized double-blind study. One hundred twenty-nine patients with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV congestive heart failure were randomized to receive either lisinopril 5 mg/day (n = 64) or captopril 37.5 mg/day (n = 65) in 15 centers. Drug doses could be titrated upwards every 4 weeks. The primary measure of drug efficacy was improvement in treadmill exercise time using a modified Naughton protocol. Secondary measures of efficacy and the development of adverse effects were also examined. Lisinopril improved exercise time (following 12 weeks of therapy) more than captopril [from 500 +/- 30 to 682 +/- 34 sec (mean +/- SEM) with lisinopril versus 480 +/- 26 to 600 +/- 35 sec with captopril; difference between groups, p less than 0.05]. Adverse drug effects were unusual and similar in frequency in the two groups, although an increase in blood urea nitrogen was more common with lisinopril than with captopril (p less than 0.05). These results indicate that using the doses and treatment regimens studied, lisinopril is more effective than captopril for the treatment of symptomatic congestive heart failure. Adverse experiences with lisinopril were infrequent and similar in incidence to those observed with captopril.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors , Captopril/therapeutic use , Enalapril/analogs & derivatives , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Captopril/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Enalapril/adverse effects , Enalapril/therapeutic use , Female , Heart Function Tests , Humans , Lisinopril , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Exertion , Random Allocation
5.
Chest ; 86(2): 198-202, 1984 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6611245

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the usefulness of telephonically-monitored home exercise in patients within two weeks postcoronary bypass surgery, we randomly enrolled 46 male patients in a 12-week home program of either short walks or bicycle ergometry. Home exercise was done five times weekly and monitored both before and immediately after three times weekly. New arrhythmias or conduction disturbances were detected in 18 of 23 (78 percent) of the bicycle group and in 20 of 23 (87 percent) of the short walk patients. New symptoms developed in three patients, two from the short walk group and one from the bicycle group. Two bikers and one walker developed elevated blood pressure; all were referred to physicians and were successfully managed. Electrocardiographic abnormalities led directly to diagnostic and therapeutic intervention in nine of the 46 patients-four bikers and five walkers. There were no complications such as ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Technically clear telephone rhythm strips were obtained from patients calling both locally and long distance.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/rehabilitation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Physical Exertion , Telephone , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Blood Pressure , Electrocardiography , Humans , Locomotion , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL