Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 198(18): 1368-1376, 2022 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055968

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare the lens equivalent dose (LED) measured during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using DOSIRIS™ as a dedicated dosemeter to that measured using glass badges to determine if glass badges can be alternative tools for LED measurement. LEDs for physicians during ERCP were measured using the DOSIRIS™ [3-mm dose equivalent] worn on the outer edge of the eyes and personal dosemeters (glass badges) [0.07-mm dose equivalent] worn on the right and left sides of the neck. The cumulated doses over 6 months for the left eye using DOSIRIS™ were 9.5 and 11.8 mSv for physicians A and B, whereas doses measured using glass badges were 7.5 and 11.6 mSv, respectively. The LEDs of the physicians at the left eye and left neck side showed almost similar values and were significantly correlated (r = 0.95; p < 0.01). For an accurate LED measurement during ERCP, using a dosemeter such as DOSIRIS™ is recommended, although similar LED estimation values were reported using glass badges on the left neck side.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Protection , Humans , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Radiation Dosage , Occupational Exposure/analysis
2.
Acta Cardiol ; 71(2): 151-5, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27090036

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac interventional radiology (IR) can cause radiation injury to the staff who administer it as well as to patients. Although education in the basic principles of radiation is required for nurses, their level of radiation safety knowledge is not known. The present study used a questionnaire protocol to assess the level of radiation safety knowledge among hospital nurses. METHODS AND RESULTS: A questionnaire to assess the level of training and current understanding of radiation safety was administered to 305 nurses in 2008 and again to 359 nurses in 2010. Our study indicates that nurses had insufficient knowledge about radiation safety, and that a high percentage of nurses were concerned about the health hazards of radiation. Moreover, more than 80% of the nurses expressed an interest in attending periodic radiation safety seminars. Annual radiation protection training for hospital staff (including nurses) is important. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that nurses do not have sufficient knowledge of radiation safety and should receive appropriate radiation safety training. Many had a minimal understanding of radiation and thus had significant concerns about the safety of working with radiation. Periodic radiation safety education/training for nurses is essential.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health/education , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiography, Interventional , Cardiology/methods , Educational Measurement , Fluoroscopy/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Japan , Needs Assessment , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Radiography, Interventional/nursing , Staff Development/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Implement Sci ; 10: 67, 2015 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25952042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines assist physicians to make decisions about suitable healthcare. We conducted a controlled before-and-after study to investigate the impact of professional-led guideline workshops for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) management on physicians' clinical practices, discharge mortality, and associated morbid conditions among preterm neonates. METHODS: We recruited physicians practicing at two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Japan and used the data of all neonates weighing less than or equal to 1,500 g admitted to 90 NICUs (2 intervention NICUs and 88 control NICUs) in the Neonatal Research Network of Japan from April 2008 to March 2010. We held 1-day workshops for physicians on PDA clinical practice guidelines at the two intervention NICUs. Physicians' skills assessed by confidence rating (CR) scores and the Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT) were compared between pre- and post-workshop month at the intervention NICUs using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Neonatal discharge mortality and morbidity were compared between pre- and post-workshop year at both the intervention and control NICUs using multivariable regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Fifteen physicians were included in the study. Physicians' CR scores (2.14 vs. 2.47, p = 0.02) and SPRAT (4.14 vs. 4.50, p = 0.05) in PDA management improved after the workshops. The analyses of neonatal outcomes included 294 and 6,234 neonates in the intervention and control NICUs, respectively. Neonates' discharge mortality declined sharply at the intervention NICUs (from 15/146 to 5/148, relative risk reduction -0.67; adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.89) during the post-workshop period. The mortality reduction was much greater than that in the control NICUs (from 207/3,322 to 147/2,912, relative risk reduction -0.19; adjusted odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.95), although the difference between the intervention and control NICUs were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, physicians' confidence in PDA management improved after attending guideline workshops. Face-to-face workshops by guideline developers can be a useful strategy to improve physicians' PDA management skills and, thereby, might reduce PDA-associated mortality in preterm neonates.


Subject(s)
Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/therapy , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/surgery , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Japan
5.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23089840

ABSTRACT

Radiation safety education/training is essential and is associated with a reduction in the radiation dose to both patients and staff. We used a questionnaire to assess the level of radiation safety knowledge among nurses working at Tohoku Kosei-Nenkin Hospital. Some nurses were also interviewed. The results of our study indicate that the nurses had insufficient radiation safety knowledge and that a high percentage of nurses were concerned about the health hazards of radiation. Moreover, more than 80% of the nurses expressed an interest in attending periodic radiation safety seminars. Appropriate radiation safety training is required to reduce nurse radiation doses, and an understanding of radiation safety can help to optimize the patient dose.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Continuing , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Radiation Effects , Hazardous Substances , Japan , Radiation Protection , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Neonatology ; 92(4): 236-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17570943

ABSTRACT

Several studies have reported that postnatally acquired cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can cause sepsis-like syndrome in premature infants. We here report a 622-gram birth weight male infant of 23 weeks' gestation who had sepsis-like syndrome and pneumonia. Substantial CMV loads were detected in peripheral blood cells, plasma, and urine when the patient was in crisis, but was decreased in parallel to clinical improvement without using ganciclovir. CMV DNA was not detected from his umbilical cord or Guthrie card, even by highly sensitive real-time PCR. Molecular profiles were indistinguishable between the CMV strain isolated from his urine and that from maternal breast milk, indicating postnatal acquisition of CMV through breast milk. Although he had transient hearing impairment, his neurodevelopmental outcome of 30 months of corrected age was normal. Further accumulation of clinical and virological data in postnatal CMV infection is necessary for evaluating the severity and selecting patients requiring antiviral therapy.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/transmission , Infant, Premature , Milk, Human/virology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Cytomegalovirus/pathogenicity , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Female , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Severity of Illness Index
7.
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi ; 61(12): 1632-7, 2005 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16395238

ABSTRACT

Since cardiac interventional procedures deliver high doses of radiation to the physician, radiation protection for the physician in cardiac catheterization laboratories is very important. One of the most important means of protecting the physician from scatter radiation is to use additional lead shielding devices, such as tableside lead drapes and ceiling-mounted lead acrylic protection. During cardiac interventional procedures (cardiac IVR), however, it is not clear how much lead shielding reduces the physician dose. This study compared the physician dose [effective dose equivalent (EDE) and dose equivalent (DE)] with and without additional shielding during cardiac IVR. Fluoroscopy scatter radiation was measured using a human phantom, with an ionization chamber survey meter, with and without additional shielding. With the additional shielding, fluoroscopy scatter radiation measured with the human phantom was reduced by up to 98%, as compared with that without. The mean EDE (whole body, mean+/-SD) dose to the operator, determined using a Luxel badge, was 2.55+/-1.65 and 4.65+/-1.21 mSv/year with and without the additional shielding, respectively (p=0.086). Similarly, the mean DE (lens of the eye) to the operator was 15.0+/-9.3 and 25.73+/-5.28 mSv/year, respectively (p=0.092). In conclusion, although tableside drapes and lead acrylic shields suspended from the ceiling provided extra protection to the physician during cardiac IVR, the reduction in the estimated physician dose (EDE and DE) during cardiac catheterization with additional shielding was lower than we expected. Therefore, there is a need to develop more ergonomically useful protection devices for cardiac IVR.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Protective Devices , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiography, Interventional , Fluoroscopy , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Scattering, Radiation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...