Factors Predicting Parent Anxiety Around Infant and Toddler Postoperative and Pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Understanding of parent anxiety and its effect on infant postoperative pain is limited. We sought to identify psychological factors associated with preoperative anxiety for parents of infants and toddlers undergoing elective surgery and to determine whether parent anxiety is associated with child postoperative pain. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of consecutively eligible patients aged ≤18 months undergoing craniofacial surgery and their parents. Preoperative parent assessment included anxiety, coping, parent health locus of control, and self-efficacy. Postoperative inpatient child pain scores and medication use were collected. Analyses included hierarchical multivariable logistic and linear regression models. RESULTS: Parents (n = 71, 90% female) of young children (mean age 6.6 months) undergoing cleft lip or palate (n = 59) or cranial vault repair (n = 13) were enrolled. Maladaptive coping (odds ratio 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.6), low parent self-efficacy (odds ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.5), and external locus of control (odds ratio 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.9) were independently associated with high parental anxiety. The adjusted odds of moderate/severe parent anxiety was 3.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-9.1) higher with each SD increase in maladaptive coping. High parental anxiety was correlated with significantly higher hospital mean child pain scores (1.87 points on 0-10 scale; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-3.70; P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: Coping and self-efficacy are modifiable factors that contribute to parent anxiety before and during hospitalization and may be targets for intervention. Infants and toddlers undergoing elective craniofacial surgery with highly anxious parents may be at greater risk for higher postoperative pain.

Comparison of minimally invasive versus conventional open harvesting techniques for iliac bone graft in secondary alveolar cleft patients.

BACKGROUND: Autologous bone grafts, often harvested from the iliac crest, are the criterion standard for secondary alveolar cleft repair. The best technique for harvest remains controversial. Minimally invasive techniques have been used for bone graft harvest in cleft patients, but outcome studies have been limited by small numbers of patients. METHODS: A total of 104 patients undergoing bone grafting for alveolar cleft were reviewed. Fifty-five consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive iliac bone graft harvest using the Acumed power-driven trephine system performed by the same surgeon. These patients were compared with 49 control patients undergoing a similar procedure in which the traditional method of open iliac bone harvest with an osteotome was used. RESULTS: Operative time for the bone graft harvest was significantly shorter with the Acumed device when compared with the osteotome (2.37 hours versus 3.26 hours, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent minimally invasive Acumed bone harvest required significantly less postoperative analgesia than did patients who underwent osteotome harvest, for both narcotic (0.31 mg/kg versus 1.64 mg/kg, p < 0.001) and nonnarcotic (15.1 mg/kg versus 27.2 mg/kg, p < 0.01) pain medication. Acumed patients had significantly less pain on discharge (0.26 versus 3.1 pain scores on a scale from 0 to 10, p < 0.001) and left the hospital more quickly (23.3 hours versus 30.1 hours, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive bone graft harvest technique using the trephine system offers a superior alternative to the conventional open iliac bone harvest method for patients undergoing secondary alveolar cleft repair, with shorter operative time, decreased requirement for pain medications, less pain on discharge, and a shorter hospital stay. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.