Epidemiological study of respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults during the pandemic of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: While respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most common pathogens in adults admitted to the ICU due to respiratory diseases, no reports regarding the occurrence rate of RSV infections in adults in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic exist. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to examine the exact occurrence rate of RSV infections in adults. We reviewed all patients (≥18 years) with any respiratory symptoms who received quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using nasopharyngeal samples for respiratory viruses by GeneLEAD at the Aichi Medical University Hospital between November 2022 and November 2023. RESULTS: A total of 541 adult patients who underwent PCR test were enrolled in this study. RSV was identified in 18 cases (3.3 %); 8 (1.5 %) upper and 10 (1.8 %) lower respiratory tract infections. Influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 were found in 10 (1.8 %) and 61 (11.3 %), respectively. Patients with RSV infections and COVID-19 had more comorbidities than those with Influenza virus infections. As for RSV-associated with lower respiratory tract infection cases, 10 developed acute respiratory failure, resulting in 1 fatal case due to pneumonia and 1 died of septic shock due to ileus. The 30-, 90-day mortality rates were 1 (6 %) and 2 (11 %) respectively. CONCLUSION: About 3 % of adults had RSV infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. The outcomes of RSV infections in adults were similar to those by COVID-19. Those with comorbidities should have a preventive method against RSV infections, the same as for COVID-19.

Clinical characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of Fusobacterium species isolated over 10 years at a Japanese university hospital.

PURPOSE: Anaerobic bacteria, existing on human skin and mucous membranes, can cause severe infections with complications or mortality. We examined the clinical characteristics of patients infected with Fusobacterium spp. and assessed their antibiotic susceptibility. METHODS: Clinical data were collated from patients diagnosed with Fusobacterium infections in a Japanese university hospital between 2014 and 2023. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 299 Fusobacterium isolates. The median age was 61 years (range, 14-95 years), with females constituting 43.1% of the patients. Most infections were community-acquired (84.6%, 253/299). Multiple bacterial strains were isolated simultaneously in 74.6% of cases. One-fourth of the patients had solid organ malignancies (25.4%, 76/299), and 14.5% (11/76) of those had colorectal cancer. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%. Fusobacterium species were isolated from blood cultures in 6% (18/299) of the patients. Patients, aged 75 years or older, with cerebrovascular disease or hematologic malignancy exhibited significantly higher prevalence of blood culture isolates in univariate analysis. Each Fusobacterium species had its characteristic infection site. Approximately 5% F. nucleatum and F. necrophorum isolates showed penicillin G resistance. Moxifloxacin resistance was observed in varying degrees across strains, ranging from 4.6 to 100% of isolates. All isolates were sensitive to ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors, carbapenems, and metronidazole. CONCLUSION: We show a link between Fusobacterium species and solid organ malignancies. We observed resistance to penicillin, cefmetazole, clindamycin, and moxifloxacin, warranting caution in their clinical use. This study offers valuable insights for managing Fusobacterium infections and guiding empirical treatments.

Comparative study of SmartAmp assay and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction by saliva specimen for the diagnosing COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been problematic worldwide. A new SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test (SmartAmp) was licensed in Japan in July 2021. This method, which enables us to diagnose COVID-19 as well as a gene mutation on the virus, is promising to reduce medical costs and staff labor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SmartAmp assay for diagnosing COVID-19, we performed this retrospective study at our institute during April and May 2021. We compared the results of the SmartAmp assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) using a saliva sample from individuals suspected as having COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 70 samples tested, the SmartAmp assay had 50 (71%) positive and 20 (29%) negative results. Using rRT-PCR as a reference, the diagnostic accuracy displayed a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 97.7%, and a negative predictive value of 70.4%. On the other hand, false-negative cases were found in 7 (10%), and there was no significant difference of Ct-value between true positive and false negative cases (Mean Ct-value 25.2 vs. 27.5 cycles, p = 0.226 by Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION: The SmartAmp assay is a valuable method to diagnose COVID-19 rapidly. However, the negative predictive value is not high enough to diagnose the disease, so that negative results should be considered for rRT-PCR testing if patients are suspected of having COVID-19.

Efficacy and validity of automated quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen test from saliva specimen in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been problematic worldwide. A new SARS-CoV-2 antigen test (LUMIPULSEⓇ) was licensed and widely used in Japan since May 2020. We conducted this study intending to whether the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test using a saliva sample is effective and valid for the diagnosis of COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed and compared the diagnostic accuracy of both the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test and real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) using a saliva sample from individuals suspected as having COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 305 samples were collected and tested in Aichi Medical University Hospital and affiliated facilities from December 2020 until January 2021 at our institute. Using reverse-transcription PCR as a reference, the AUROC of the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test was 0.903 (95% confidential interval 0.845-0.962, p < 0.001). The appropriate cut-off antigen level was 4.0 pg/mL and had a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 99.6%, a positive predictive value of 98%, and a negative predictive value of 94.5%. On the other hand, the diagnostic accuracy of the antigen test decreased among patients among patients with COVID-19 with threshold cycle (Ct-value)≥27, which shows the AUROC was 0.795 (95%CI 0.687-0.907, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While the automated quantitative CLEIA antigen test from saliva specimen could be one of the most useful diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in general practice, clinicians should know the limitations of the antigen test.