ABSTRACT
Community health workers (CHW) are the backbone of the public health system in developing countries. Little is known about the practice of ethics and professionalism in their work. This study was conducted to explore the experiential wisdom of ethics and professionalism among CHWs in Tamil Nadu. We conducted a qualitative study among 125 CHWs in six districts of Tamil Nadu. We found that the CHWs went beyond the call of their duty to do good to the community. Their conceptualization of autonomy ranged from shared to full paternalistic decision making. The CHWs were sensitive to issues of privacy and confidentiality, but the discussion on these topics were limited. They reflected the societal norms of gender, class, and caste hierarchies in their work. They had to work amidst difficult power struggles and had their own innovative strategies to subvert power. In conclusion, there is a need for framing a code of ethics and professionalism for CHWs and training in ethics and professionalism for them to help them effectively deliberate on ethical issues.
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an ontological review of the global research on access to geriatric disability care and a roadmap for future research to address the problem in India. First, the dominant research focus is on resources (human, financial, and spatial) that affect access to disability care; there is little focus on informational and technological resources. Second, functional disabilities are the dominant focus of the research, followed by cognitive, mental, and locomotor disabilities; there is little focus on speech, hearing, and visual disabilities. Third, barriers, inhibitors, and catalysts of physical access are the dominant focus, with relatively less focus on virtual access; there is very little emphasis on the drivers to access. Fourth, the primary, although not dominant, focus is on access for urban and rural populations; there is very little focus on access for underserved and indigenous populations. Future research must address these gaps systematically to improve access. This paper adds: (a) a systemic framework for the study of an important, complex, emerging problem; (b) a systematic review of the global research on the problem; and (c) a research roadmap to address the emerging problem in India.
Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Health Services Accessibility , Aged , Humans , India , Rural PopulationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The increasing ageing population of India has unique challenges due to changing social structure, health issues and inaccessible healthcare facilities. These challenges can adversely affect the quality of life (QOL) of older persons. Hence, this study was undertaken with the objective of assessing the QOL among older persons in an urban and rural area of Bangalore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study was done among 977 older persons 60 years and above. Census enumeration blocks in urban areas and villages in rural areas were randomly selected and all older persons meeting the inclusion criteria were administered the WHOQOL-Bref questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean QOL scores (SD) in the physical, psychological, social relationship and environmental domains were 50.5 (5.5), 49.2 (5.5), 49.4 (6.5) and 49.3 (5.1) in rural areas and 57.4 (8.9), 58.6 (8.8), 64.6 (10.8) and 60.0 (9.4) in urban areas, respectively. Compared to urban, rural older persons uniformly have lower QOL irrespective of sex, education or financial dependence. CONCLUSION: Inequitable health resource distribution and inadequate social support systems must be addressed to improve the QOL of older persons, especially in rural areas. Primary care providing essential services can bridge this urban-rural divide and improve QOL of older persons.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Prompt identification, reporting and management of ADRs during anti tuberculosis treatment can ensure better compliance and treatment outcomes. The study was conducted to identify the gaps and associated factors in reporting of ADRs under RNTCP; assess knowledge, attitude and practice of RNTCP staff regarding pharmacovigilance programme and explore the barriers in reporting of ADRs from provider's perspective. METHODS: Mixed method research with sequential explanatory design was carried out in Tuberculosis Units of RNTCP administrative district of Bangalore city during July to December 2017. Quantitative study was carried out among 222 patients on intensive phase of Category I and Category II DOTS to study the incidence, severity and causality of ADRs; and records of these patients were analysed for gaps in reporting. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) regarding recording and reporting aspect of pharmacovigilance programme was assessed among RNTCP staff. As part of the qualitative study, focus group discussion was carried out among RNTCP staff to study barriers for reporting ADRs from the provider's perspective. RESULTS: Record analysis at the time of recruitment showed documentation of ADRs in only five patients. Subsequent analysis of patient records during the middle and end of the intensive phase (IP) did not show documentation of any ADRs. Simultaneously interviews with patients revealed 116 (52.2%), 72 (32.4%) and 53 (23.8%) patients reported one or more symptoms of ADRs. The commonest ADR symptom reported were fatigability and gastrointestinal symptoms followed by musculoskeletal symptoms. KAP among 25 RNTCP staff showed that 96% of them felt reporting of ADRs was necessary and 92% reported the ADRs to their seniors, however 12% were scared to report. The main reason expressed for non-reporting was 'managing ADRs is more important than reporting' (52%). Also, 32% felt the need for retraining of staff on reporting and documentation. Barriers to reporting of ADRs were both health-system related like insufficient training and inadequate guidelines provided to RNTCP staff and patient-related factors like lack of awareness and reluctance to report ADRs. CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of RNTCP and achievement of TB elimination requires provision of adequate information regarding ADRs to patients and intense follow-up and probing at each contact by programme staff to effectively manage ADRs.
