Evaluating prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with diabetes and albuminuria.

AIM: Although guidelines recommend the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria, their use remains suboptimal in several developed countries. Limited data are available on ACEi/ARB use in developing countries. Here, we assessed the use of ACEi/ARB and identified factors contributing to their underutilization at Hatyai Hospital, Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Hatyai Hospital database. Adult patients with diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria were included. Clinical data and laboratory results were extracted. Furthermore, this study recorded pre-specified conditions that influenced physicians' decisions regarding the prescription of ACEi/ARBs in patients who did not adhere to guidelines. RESULTS: Of 4,655 eligible patients, 500 patients were selected. The average age of the patients was 66.3 years, and 59.6% were female. The adherence rate was 72.4%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found a significant association between non-adherence and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04 - 1.60, p = 0.019). The most common pre-specified condition contributing to non-adherence was "no condition identified" (69.8%). Among the cases of non-adherence, 21.7% were due to ACEi/ARB discontinuation after acute kidney injury, followed by hyperkalemia (5.1%) and a moderate increase in serum creatinine (4.3%). CONCLUSION: ACEi/ARB therapy was suboptimal in patients with diabetes, hypertension, and albuminuria. Non-adherence was associated with CKD stage, possibly because of concerns about adverse events and healthcare-related factors.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between culture-negative and positive peritonitis in patients undergoing maintenance peritoneal dialysis: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Culture-negative peritonitis is a serious complication in patients undergoing maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) and occurs in up to 40% of all peritonitis episodes. Despite its high incidence, data regarding treatment response and prognosis remain poorly defined. This study compared the clinical outcomes of patients with culture-negative and positive peritonitis. METHOD: This prospective cohort study was conducted between 2021 and 2022. Patients treated with maintenance PD who developed PD-associated peritonitis were included and received standard treatment. The primary endpoint was the primary response (resolution of peritonitis 10 days after the initiation of treatment). RESULTS: Of the 81 patients who developed PD-associated peritonitis during the study, 35 and 46 had culture-negative and culture-positive peritonitis, respectively. Overall, 52 (64.2%) patients achieved the primary response: 24 (68.6%) in the culture-negative group and 28 (60.9%) in the culture-positive group (p = 0.630). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of complete cure (complete resolution of peritonitis without the need for Tenckhoff catheter removal or salvage antibiotic therapy or peritonitis within 120 days after treatment) (culture-negative vs. culture-positive group, 57.1% vs. 45.7%), refractory peritonitis (28.6% vs. 41.3%), relapse peritonitis (8.6% vs. 2.2%), repeat peritonitis (11.4% vs. 10.9%), salvage antibiotics (40.0% vs. 50.0%), permanent hemodialysis transfer (11.4% vs. 10.9%), Tenckhoff catheter removal (25.7% vs. 41.3%), or mortality (2.9% vs. 2.2%) (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study offers valuable insights into the clinical outcomes of culture-negative peritonitis versus culture-positive peritonitis. However, caution must be exercised in interpreting these findings due to the limitations of the small sample size. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20221130006).

Symptomatic hyponatremia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus disease-19 vaccination.

Adverse events, particularly severe adverse events, after coronavirus disease vaccination are the primary concern for many patients. We present the first report of symptomatic hyponatremia, a potentially life-threatening condition, after administration of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus disease-19 vaccine. A 24-year-old man developed altered consciousness and high-grade fever a day after receiving this vaccine. Computed tomography of the brain showed diffuse brain swelling with bilateral descending transtentorial brain herniation. His serum sodium level, urine sodium level, and urine osmolarity were 114 mEq/L, 77 mEq/L, and 230 mOsm/kg, respectively. He was diagnosed with symptomatic hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. His symptoms rapidly improved after treatment with 3% NaCl. Seven days after admission, his serum sodium level was normal, and no further intervention was required. We believe that the vaccine was the trigger for hyponatremia in this case based on temporal relationship of vaccination and hyponatremia, the rapid improvement of the patient, and the transient nature of the hyponatremia. We postulate that cytokine underlies the pathophysiology of hyponatremia in this case. Recognition of adverse events after coronavirus disease-19 vaccination is essential. Symptomatic hyponatremia should be included in the differential diagnosis in altered-consciousness patients after administration of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus disease-19 vaccine.

Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with IgA-Dominant Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis: An Unusual Picture.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case report is to illustrate a very rare case of emphysematous pyelonephritis complicated by IgAdominant postinfectious glomerulonephritis. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 53-year-old woman with emphysematous pyelonephritis who initially presented with unintentional weight loss for 3 months and subnephrotic range proteinuria without fever. Urinalysis revealed proteinuria, microscopic hematuria, and pyuria. A kidney biopsy was performed for suspected glomerulonephritis. The patient's right kidney biopsy was consistent with immunoglobulin A (IgA)-dominant infection-related glomerulonephritis. Abdominal computed tomography to seek the possible source of infection revealed staghorn stones obstructing dilated calyces and gas collection within the collecting system. The final diagnosis was emphysematous pyelonephritis of the left kidney complicated by IgA-dominant infection-related glomerulonephritis of the right kidney. CONCLUSION: We present an atypical presentation of emphysematous pyelonephritis in terms of clinical presentation (prolonged course of illness without fever) and its complications (IgA-dominant infection-related glomerulonephritis). This case study highlights the critical role of kidney biopsy in the diagnosis and the diverse clinical manifestations in clinical medicine.

Predicting lupus membranous nephritis using reduced picolinic acid to tryptophan ratio as a urinary biomarker.

The current gold standard for classifying lupus nephritis (LN) progression is a renal biopsy, which is an invasive procedure. Undergoing a series of biopsies for monitoring disease progression and treatments is unlikely suitable for patients with LN. Thus, there is an urgent need for non-invasive alternative biomarkers that can facilitate LN class diagnosis. Such biomarkers will be very useful in guiding intervention strategies to mitigate or treat patients with LN. Urine samples were collected from two independent cohorts. Patients with LN were classified into proliferative (class III/IV) and membranous (class V) by kidney histopathology. Metabolomics was performed to identify potential metabolites, which could be specific for the classification of membranous LN. The ratio of picolinic acid (Pic) to tryptophan (Trp) ([Pic/Trp] ratio) was found to be a promising candidate for LN diagnostic and membranous classification. It has high potential as an alternative biomarker for the non-invasive diagnosis of LN.