ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Molecular-level research has linked RING finger (RNF) protein family members to carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Among them, RNF128 is related to tumor progression, but reports on its association with lung cancer are few. This study aimed to clarify the unknown association between RNF128 expression and clinical outcomes in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Clinical data of 545 patients with therapy-naïve lung adenocarcinoma who underwent lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection between 1999 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between RNF128 expression and prognosis. RESULTS: Among adenocarcinoma histologic types, acinar, micropapillary, and solid tumors did not express RNF128 compared with other histologic types (p < 0.001). Patients with high RNF128 expression exhibited fewer clusters of differentiated (CD) 68+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and CD163+ TAMs. Multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) revealed that the lack of RNF128 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, p = 0.029) and OS (HR 1.83, p = 0.041), suggesting that RNF128 expression is a favorable prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: RNF128 expression may be an independent predictor of favorable outcomes in Japanese patients with untreated lung adenocarcinoma who undergo surgical resection. Further elucidation of the role of TAM-related E3 ubiquitin ligase in immune function may facilitate the development of effective immunomodulatory therapies for lung adenocarcinoma.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Prognosis , Tumor-Associated Macrophages , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesABSTRACT
IntroductionThis study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment using two immunoassays. Methods: We enrolled lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment and non-cancer patients with chronic diseases; all participants were fully vaccinated with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Blood samples were collected before the first and second vaccinations and 4 {+/-} 1 weeks after the second vaccination. Anti-acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein S1 subunit receptor-binding domain antibody titers were measured using the Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott Laboratory) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Roche Diagnostics). ResultsFifty-five lung cancer patients and 38 non-cancer patients were included in the immunogenicity analysis. Lung cancer patients showed significant increase in the geometric mean antibody titer, which was significantly lower than that in the non-cancer patients after the first (30 vs. 121 AU/mL, p<0.001 on Architect; 4.0 vs 1.2 U/mL, p<0.001, on Elecsys) and second vaccinations (1632 vs. 3472 AU/mL, p=0.005, on Architect; 213 vs 573 A/mL, p=0.002, on Elecsys). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for seroprotection was significantly lower in the lung cancer patients. Analysis of the anticancer treatment types showed that the adjusted OR for seroprotection was significantly lower in lung cancer patients receiving cytotoxic agents. Lung cancer patients showed no increase in the number of adverse reactions. ConclusionsBNT162b2 vaccination in lung cancer patients undergoing anticancer treatment significantly increased antibody titers and showed acceptable safety. However, the immunogenicity in these patients could be inadequate compared with that in non-cancer patients.
