Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AIDS Care ; 19(4): 554-60, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17453597

ABSTRACT

There is on-going global debate and policy-setting concerning researchers' obligations to meet the health needs of people participating in HIV prevention trials in resource-poor settings. The perspectives of local community stakeholders on this issue are poorly understood as most of what is presented on behalf of communities where research takes place is anecdotal commentary. Using qualitative methods (130 in-depth interviews and 20 focus groups) we assessed perceived fairness of different strategies to meet the health needs of women who become HIV-infected during a hypothetical vaginal microbicide trial. Respondents included HIV prevention research participants, community stakeholders and health-care service providers in ten sites in seven countries (South Africa, Malawi, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Zambia, India, US). Many respondents perceived referrals to be a potentially fair way to address care and treatment needs but concerns were also voiced about the adequacy of local health-care options and the ability of trial participants to access options. Most respondents viewed the provision of antiretroviral treatment by researchers to HIV-infected trial participants as unfair if treatment was not sustained beyond the end of the trial. The results underscore the importance of effectively linking trial participants to sustainable, community-based treatment and care.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Africa , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Cost of Illness , Female , Humans , India , Male , Patient Education as Topic
2.
Health Policy Plan ; 13(1): 87-93, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10178188

ABSTRACT

Since syndromic management of STDs requires treatment with at least two antibiotics per patient, one of the concerns raised by adoption of the syndromic approach is the cost of drugs, especially for developing countries with limited drug budgets. The objective of the current study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of syndromic management to current national practice for the management of STDs in Malawi. The actual cost of observed antibiotic treatment for 144 patients receiving same day treatment for two STD syndromes in Malawi was determined using prices from the Malawi government supply catalogue. This was then compared to the calculated cost of treatment had the same patients been managed syndromically according to national guidelines. The cost of drug treatment under current practice was similar to the cost of syndromic treatment. However, at least one-third of observed patients did not receive effective treatment for either likely cause of their STD syndrome and wastage accounted for 54% of total observed drug cost. Overall, syndromic management of STDs in Malawi would result in more effective treatment of STDs at no additional cost. Since the indirect costs of low treatment efficacy were not taken into account in this analysis, a net saving is likely to be realized with the adoption of syndromic management.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/drug therapy , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Case Management/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Developing Countries/economics , Female , Humans , Malawi , Male , Treatment Outcome
3.
Int J STD AIDS ; 7(4): 269-75, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8876358

ABSTRACT

A national survey of sexually transmitted disease (STD) case management was carried out at 39 health care facilities in Malawi in 1994. Fifty-four health care providers were observed managing 150 patients presenting with selected STD syndromes and 103 providers were interviewed. STD case management was assessed by calculation of WHO/GPA prevention indicators (PIs) from observation data. The overall rate for PI-6, which measures correct assessment and treatment of STD patients was 11% (81% for history taking, 46% in physical examination, and 13% correct antibiotic treatment according to national guidelines). The score for PI-7, which measures overall patient counselling was 29% (65% for partner notification and 40% for condom advice). Although Haemophilus ducreyi is at least as common as Treponema pallidum as the causative agent for genital ulcers, only 16% of patients with genital ulcers were treated effectively for chancroid vs 56% for syphilis. Female patients received less comprehensive care than male STD patients. Only 20% of STD patients were offered condoms. Overall, the survey results support the policy decision to adopt syndromic management of STDs, and provide baseline information for planning and evaluation of a national control programme.


Subject(s)
Case Management , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Africa/epidemiology , Chancroid/therapy , Condoms , Counseling , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Female , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel , Humans , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Prejudice , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syphilis/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...