Degree of concordance between double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Capsule endoscopy is considered the diagnostic procedure of choice in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) offers both diagnostic and therapeutic potential, but is invasive, complex, and time-consuming. The aim was to evaluate diagnostic agreement between capsule endoscopy and DBE in patients with OGIB, and secondarily the diagnostic gain of DBE when capsule endoscopy detected only blood or clots in the small-bowel lumen. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study carried out at six institutions in Italy. RESULTS: 193 patients (119 men, mean age 61.6 +/- 16.2) first underwent capsule endoscopy and then DBE. The most frequent positive findings at capsule endoscopy were vascular lesions (74 patients, 38.3 %), blood or clot in the lumen (34, 17.6 %), and tumor mass (20, 10.4 %). The most frequent findings at DBE were vascular lesions (72 patients, 37.3 %), neoplasia (30, 15.5 %) and ulcers/inflammatory lesions (12, 6.2 %). Overall kappa coefficient was 0.46 (95 %CI 0.38 - 0.54), with maximum concordance for vascular (0.72 [95 %CI 0.59 - 0.84]) and inflammatory (0.78 [0.58 - 0.99]) lesions and minimum for polyps (0.46 [0.16 - 0.80]). Blood in the lumen was the only positive finding at capsule endoscopy in 34 cases; of these, 12 had negative DBE findings whereas 10 had vascular lesions, 6 neoplasia, 1 ulcer, and 5 diverticula. CONCLUSION: Capsule endoscopy and DBE have good agreement for vascular and inflammatory lesions but not for polyps or neoplasia. DBE provides valuable adjunctive information, particularly in patients with neoplasia or polyp at capsule endoscopy. DBE clarified the origin of bleeding in two-thirds of patients with capsule endoscopy showing only blood in the lumen.

Diagnostic value of endoscopic markers for celiac disease in adults: a multicentre prospective Italian study.

AIM: Some endoscopic features of duodenal mucosa are marker of mucosal injury, the most common cause being celiac disease (CD). The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the diagnostic value of the endoscopic markers for the diagnosis of CD in the adult population undergoing routine upper endoscopy. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study conducted at 37 Italian endoscopic centers. A total of 509 consecutive patients submitted to routine upper endoscopy who presented one or more of following endoscopic markers were included: 1) mucosal mosaic pattern in the bulb and/or descending duodenum (DD); 2) nodularity in the bulb and/or DD; 3) scalloping of Kerkring's folds; 4) reduction in the number or absence of folds in the DD. 4 biopsies samples were taken from descending duodenum. In patients with histological findings consistent with CD, according to Oberhuber classification, sierologic test (EMA, tTGA) were performed for confirm the diagnosis. RESULTS: At endoscopy, 249 patients showed an isolated marker; 260 subjects showed a coexistence of more than one marker; 369 patients (72.5%) presented mucosal lesions at histological examination and in 347 of these patients the diagnosis of CD was confirmed by serologic markers (94.0%). For 10 patients the diagnosis remained uncertain because of negative sierology and exclusion of other other cause of mucosal lesions. The diagnosis of CD was made in 61.3% patients who showed the mosaic pattern, in 65.7% of patients with nodular mucosa, in 64.4% of patients with scalloping of folds, in 40.2% of patients with reduction of folds, and in 61.5% of patients with loss of folds and in 83.6% of patients who showed the coexistence of more than one marker. The endoscopic markers overall had a PPV of 68% for the diagnosis of CD; the markers that singularly have demonstrated a higher correlation with CD are: mosaic mucosa of DD (PPV 65.0%), nodular mucosa of the bulb and DD (PPV 75.5%), and scalloping of folds (PPV 64.4%). CONCLUSION: The study confirms the important role of endoscopy in the diagnostic process of CD not only for the bioptic sampling in patients with clinical suspicion of CD, but especially for the opportunity to evaluate alterations of the duodenal mucosa suggestive of CD in the general population and, consequently, to identify those patients who should undergo a duodenal biopsy.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of refractory bile duct stones.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Following endoscopic sphincterotomy, 90% of bile duct stones can be removed with a Dormia basket or balloon catheter. The removal can fail in patients with large stones, intrahepatic stones, bile duct strictures or a difficult anatomy. The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in fragmenting and allowing the extraction of bile duct stones that could not be cleared by routine endoscopic means including mechanical lithotripsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to January 2005, we treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 376 patients (133 males and 243 females, median age 71.4 years) with bile duct stones that were not removable following endoscopic sphincterotomy, using the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Lithostar Plus machine built by Siemens Co. of Erlangen, Germany. Stone targeting was performed fluoroscopically following injection of contrast via nasobiliary drain or T-tube in 362 patients and by ultrasonography in eight patients. Residual fragments were cleared at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograhy. Two hundred and ten of the 370 patients treated (56.7%) showed only 1 stone, 57 (15.4%) showed 2, 45 (12.1%) showed 3, 58 (15.6%) showed more than 3 stones. The median diameter of the stones was 21mm (range 7-80mm). RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 334 of the 376 patients who underwent the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy procedure (90.2%). Six patients (1.5%) dropped out of treatment during their first sessions, mainly because of intolerance. Each patient averaged 3.7 treatments (1-12), at an average rate of 3470 shocks per session (1500-5400), at an average energy level of 3.4mJ (1-7). Complications were recorded in 34 patients (9.1%); 22 patients experienced symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia, 4 haemobilia, 2 cholangitis, 3 haematuria, 3 dyspnoea; no deaths were associated with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a safe and effective therapy in those patients in whom endoscopic techniques have failed with a clearing rate of 90.2% of refractory bile duct stones with a low rate of complications.

Bovine lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: an open, randomized, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Cure rates for eradication of Helicobacter pylori appear to be decreasing, thus more effective therapies must be identified. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of bovine lactoferrin in the treatment of H. pylori infection. METHODS: In a multicentered prospective study, 402 (mean age 52.4, range 19-84 years) H. pylori-positive patients were assigned to one of three regimens: group A - esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. for 7 days; group B - lactoferrin 200 mg b.d. for 7 days followed by the same schedule of group A; group C - esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus lactoferrin 200 mg b.d. for 7 days. RESULTS: Of the 402 patients, 389 completed the study. Six patients were discontinued due to side effects, one patient in group B died and six patients were lost to follow up. The eradication rate (intention-to-treat analysis) was 77% in group A (105/136), 73% in group B (97/132) and 90% in group C (120/134) (chi(2)-test P < 0.01). The incidence of side effects was 9.5% in group A, 9% in group B and 8.2% in group C (chi(2)-test P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that bovine lactoferrin is an effective adjuvant to 7-day triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori infection.

Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of multicenter prospective studies on complications of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: We studied 2769 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP at nine centers in the Triveneto region of Italy over a 2-year period. Six centers performed ERCP on less than 200 patients per year (small centers). General and ERCP-specific major complications were predefined. Data were collected at the time of ERCP, before discharge, and in cases of readmission within 30 days. ERCP was defined as therapeutic when endoscopic sphincterotomy (n = 1583), precut (n = 419), or drainage (n = 701) had been carried out, singularly or in combination. RESULTS: One hundred eleven major complications (4.0%) were recorded: moderate-severe pancreatitis 36 (1.3%), cholangitis 24 (0.87%), hemorrhage 21 (0.76%), duodenal perforation 16 (0.58%), others 14 (0.51%). Among 942 diagnostic ERCPs there were 13 major complications (1.38%) and 2 deaths (0.21%), whereas among 1827 therapeutic ERCPs there were 98 major complications (5.4%) and 9 deaths (0.49%). The difference in the incidence of complications between diagnostic and therapeutic ERCPs was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Small center and precut were recognized as independent risk factors for overall major complications of therapeutic ERCP, whereas the following risk factors were identified in relation to specific complications: (1) pancreatitis: age less than 70 years, pancreatic duct opacification, and nondilated common bile duct; (2) cholangitis: small center, jaundice; (3) hemorrhage: small center; and (4) retroperitoneal duodenal perforation: precut, intramural injection of contrast medium, and Billroth II gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Major complications are mostly associated with therapeutic procedures and low case volume. Present data support a policy of centralization of ERCP in referral centers. A more selected and safer use of precut may be expected to further limit the adverse events of ERCP.

Treatment of erosive reflux oesophagitis: a double-blind multicentre trial with nizatidine 300 mg b.i.d. versus placebo.

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists at conventional doses have proved only partly efficacious in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the efficacy of high doses of nizatidine (300 mg b.i.d.) versus placebo in 117 patients with grade I and II oesophagitis. After 6 weeks' treatment, 70.6% of nizatidine-treated patients showed complete endoscopic healing against 25.4% of placebo-treated subjects (p less than 0.001). After 12 weeks, the respective healing rates were 77.5% and 47.4% (p less than 0.01). Nizatidine also proved significantly more effective than placebo in improving overall symptoms (p less than 0.05). Antacid intake was significantly greater in the placebo group (p less than 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that nizatidine at the dose of 300 mg b.i.d. for 6-12 weeks constitutes an effective treatment for patients with reflux oesophagitis.

Oxmetidine in the short term treatment of active duodenal ulcer. A review and commentary.

Oxmetidine is an H2-antagonist like cimetidine containing an imidazole ring in its molecule, but differing from cimetidine in that it contains in the side-chain a substituted isocytosine moiety in place of the cyanoguanidine group. Nine controlled clinical trials are critically analysed in detail. The overall results show that the antiulcer activity of oxmetidine is not significantly different from that of cimetidine with mean healing rates by week 4 of 74.9% and 75.3%, respectively. Healing rates proved to be lower in smokers than in non-smokers in all trials but one. Satisfactory response as regards symptoms was obtained both with oxmetidine and cimetidine. A certain degree of variability with regard to the untoward effects was found, but in all cases failed to prove significant from the clinical point of view. However, a better definition of oxmetidine safety requires a study on a large number of patients and for a longer period.

[Acute drug-induced pancreatitis]. / Medikamentös induzierte akute Pankreatitis.

93 publications concerning drug-induced pancreatitis are reviewed. A confirmed causal relationship between drug and acute pancreatitis so far exists only for 8 compounds: azathioprine, chlorothiazide, furosemide, sulfonamides, tetracycline, estrogens, valproic acid and L-asparaginase. There is less convincing, but still suggestive, evidence for a causal relationship with 5 other drugs, namely: corticosteroids, chlorthalidone, ethacrynic acid, phenformin and iatrogenic hypercalcemia. Due to inadequate or contradictory evidence, the link between a number of additional drugs and acute pancreatitis is considered possible, conditional or doubtful. Finally, the scant literature concerning the pathogenesis and histological lesions of drug-induced pancreatitis is briefly reviewed.

Is ethanol metabolism affected by oral administration of cimetidine and ranitidine at therapeutic doses?

The aim of this study was to compare the ethanol serum concentration curve, the area under the curve and subjective response after acute ingestion of ethanol (red wine, 13 degrees proof, at a dose of 0.8 g/kg of ideal weight in 6 healthy volunteers with a mean habitual alcohol intake of 20 g/day. All the subjects underwent the test a total of three times, after pre-treatment with cimetidine (400 mg X 2/day/7 days) and ranitidine (150 mg X 2/day/7 days), respectively, and after receiving no pre-treatment. The wine was taken orally within the space of 15 min, four hours after taking a standard-weight ham sandwich. Blood samples were drawn at the following times: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes. The plasma ethanol curve of the subjects pre-treated with cimetidine lies above that of the subjects pre-treated with ranitidine, and largely coincides with the curve obtained in those who received no pre-treatment, with the exception of the initial hour-and-a-half, when the later show a slightly higher mean plasma concentration. The differences between the three treatment groups are merely arithmetical, but not statistical, with respect to peak plasma ethanol concentrations, time elapsing before peaking, and areas under the curves. These results are at variance with some published data suggesting a significant interaction of cimetidine with the metabolism of alcohol by way of interference either with the hepatic oxidative metabolizing enzymes, or with the activity of alcohol dehydrogenase.

Endoscopic double-blind controlled trial of ranitidine vs placebo in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Fourty patients with endoscopically proven pyloric or duodenal ulcer were treated with ranitidine 40 mg t.d. with meals and 80 mg nocte, or identical placebo tablets under double-blind conditions. Endoscopy after four weeks of treatment revealed complete healing in 15 out of 18 (83.3%) ranitidine-treated patients and in 5 out of 17 (29.4%) of the placebo patients (P less than 0.01). Ulcer symptoms were significantly less in ranitidine-treated patients, while the difference in antacid consumption between the two groups was found to be only arithmetical. No side effects or significant hematological or biochemical abnormalities were found. Four-week treatment with 200 mg of ranitidine daily seems to correspond to that of 6-8 weeks with 1-1, 6 g of cimetidine.