Association of Food and Housing Insecurity on Outcomes in Pregnant Patients With Substance Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Food insecurity (FI) may be associated with worsened neonatal abstinence syndrome severity in infants born to individuals with substance use disorder. This study evaluates FI and housing insecurity (HI) influence on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a cohort study of patients receiving obstetric care through a multispecialty program in Kentucky from 2015 to 2023. Inclusion criteria were: (1) program participants over age 18 consenting to observational research, (2) delivering at University of Kentucky, and (3) not withdrawing from research at any time. Initially, a subset of patients for whom FI and HI concerns were heightened were screened. In 2019, FI and HI screening became standard of care at the clinic. Housing was assessed on enrollment. A validated 2-question Hunger Vital Sign FI screen was utilized for a subset of patients. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, including adverse delivery outcomes, maternal comorbidities, and birth complications, were observed. Fisher's exact and 2 sample t tests were performed. RESULTS: Of 494 participants, 188 (38%) identified at risk for HI. At enrollment, 221 (45%) individuals reported owning their primary residence, 85 (17%) were in group residential treatment, 34 (6.9%) had no housing, and 134 (27%) lived at another's residence. Disposition of a child to a relative or not the patient's own care was greater with HI, 51% versus 47%. Of 155 respondents, 96 (62%) reported FI, associated with increased neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, 86% versus 74%. Using the validated tool, Abuse Assessment Screen, abuse was significantly greater with FI, 76% versus 58%. Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scales >12 indicating depression were more common with FI, 63% versus 32%, P < .05. Anxiety scores were also higher with FI, P < .05. Patients with FI were more likely to experience abuse. CONCLUSIONS: FI and HI were health-related needs associated with increased anxiety, depression, infant NICU admission, and loss of child custody.

Do We Know Where They Go? Obtaining Travel History in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how often travel histories are obtained in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was performed at a single tertiary care children's hospital for patients aged 2 months to 18 years who were admitted October 2015-December 2017 with International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for potential travel-related illnesses. Demographic information and travel history documentation were obtained, along with travel-related testing. From May to June 2018, prospective, single-blinded, direct observation of a convenience sample of pediatric residents was performed during the initial patient encounter to determine the frequency and quality of travel histories obtained regardless of documentation. RESULTS: Of 249 charts reviewed, 27 (10.8%) patients had a travel history query documented. Patients with complex chronic conditions were significantly less likely to have a travel history documented (37% vs 67%; P = 0.005). Age, sex, length of stay, race, payer status, and critical care admission did not significantly differ between groups. Those with a travel history documented were more likely to have a documented exposure history (100% vs 52%; P < 0.001) and additional testing performed (56% vs 13%, P < 0.001). During this time, a simulation course with residents featuring travel-related diagnoses led to a significant increase in documented travel histories (5% prior versus 21% after, P = 0.03). A total of 37 patient encounters were observed; travel history was asked for 4 times (4/37, 10.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Travel histories are rarely asked for in pediatric patients. Missed diagnoses may not only affect the patient but also have broader public health implications. Simulation is an effective tool to improve history-taking skills, yet more work is still needed.

Travel Histories in Children: How Well Do Interns and Medical Students Do?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge of obtaining travel histories in medical students and interns. METHODS: Medical students and interns participated in a high-fidelity pediatric simulation with two cases (malaria or typhoid fever) that hinged on travel history. After the simulation, appropriate methods of obtaining travel histories were discussed. Participants completed surveys regarding their previous education and comfort with obtaining travel histories. If and how a travel history was obtained was derived from simulation observation. RESULTS: From June 2016 to July 2017, 145 medical trainees participated in 24 simulation sessions; 45% reported no prior training in obtaining travel histories. Participants asked for a travel history in all but 2 simulations; however, in 9 of 24 simulations (38%), they required prompting by either a simulation confederate or laboratory results. Participants were more comfortable diagnosing/treating conditions acquired from US domestic travel than from international travel (32.9% vs 22.4%, P < 0.001). Previous education in obtaining travel histories and past international travel did not significantly influence the level of comfort that participants felt with travel histories. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the lack of knowledge regarding the importance of travel histories as part of basic history taking. Medical students and interns had low levels of comfort in obtaining adequate travel histories and diagnosing conditions acquired from international travel.