Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic comparison of two fixed dose combination of Metformin/ Glibenclamide formulations in healthy subjects under fed condition.

AIM: This study is conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of two fixed dose combination of metformin/glibenclamide tablets (500mg/5 mg per tablet). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, single-dose, open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-sequence and 2- period crossover study with a washout period of 7 days. All 28 adult male subjects were required to fast for at least 10 hours prior to drug administration and they were given access to water ad libitum during this period. Thirty minutes prior to dosing, all subjects were served with a standardized high-fat and high-calorie breakfast with a total calorie of 1000 kcal which was in accordance to the EMA Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence. Subsequently, subjects were administered either the test or reference preparation with 240mL of plain water in the first trial period. During the second trial period, they received the alternate preparation. Plasma levels of glibenclamide and metformin were analysed separately using two different high performance liquid chromatography methods. RESULTS: The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio of the AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax of the test preparation over those of the reference preparation were 0.9693-1.0739, 0.9598- 1.0561 and 0.9220 - 1.0642 respectively. Throughout the study period, no serious drug reaction was observed. However, a total of 26 adverse events (AE)/side effects were reported, including 24 that were definitely related to the study drugs, namely giddiness (n=17), while diarrheoa (n=3), headache (n=2) and excessive hunger (n=2) were less commonly reported by the subjects. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the test preparation is bioequivalent to the reference preparation.

Effect of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procainamide.

Renal tubular transport of organic anions and cations is assumed to be mutually exclusive. However, results of a number of in vitro and in vivo studies suggest an interaction between the organic anion, probenecid, and various organic cations in the proximal renal tubule. To evaluate the clinical importance of such an interaction, the authors investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of procainamide, an organic cation with a low therapeutic index that is excreted in part by active secretion in the proximal tubule, in the presence and absence of probenecid. In a randomized crossover study, six healthy subjects received a single 750-mg IV dose of procainamide, with and without prior probenecid administration (2 g orally). Blood and urine samples were obtained and pharmacokinetic parameters of procainamide were determined in each treatment period. QT intervals were measured from ECG recordings that were obtained at blood collection times for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Coadministration of probenecid did not result in any significant change in the overall disposition of procainamide. In particular, renal clearance was not significantly different (488 +/- 95 mL/min without probenecid vs. 478 +/- 69 mL/min in the presence of probenecid). Our data suggest an interaction between probenecid and procainamide in the proximal renal tubule does not exit. Reasons for this lack of interaction are discussed.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diltiazem and its metabolites in healthy adults after a single oral dose.

A potential complicating factor in the characterization of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diltiazem after an oral dose in the presence of two metabolites, N-demethyldiltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem, in plasma. Both N-demethyldiltiazem and desacetylditiazem have been shown to have pharmacologic activity in animal tissues. It is therefore possible that these metabolites contribute to the pharmacologic effect of diltiazem, but this possibility has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diltiazem, N-demethyldiltiazem, and desacetyldiltiazem. Particular attention was paid to the effect of diltiazem on atrioventricular conduction. Six healthy men received a 120 mg oral dose of diltiazem. Concentrations of diltiazem, N-demethyldiltiazem, and desacetyldiltiazem in plasma and urine were measured by a sensitive HPLC method. Measures of pharmacologic response (heart rate, blood pressure, and PR interval) were obtained at each blood sampling time. Mean (+/- SD) peak plasma concentrations of diltiazem, N-demethyldiltiazem, and desacetyldiltiazem were 174.3 +/- 72.7, 42.6 +/- 10.0, and 14.9 +/- 3.3 ng/ml, respectively. The apparent half-lives of diltiazem, N-demethyldiltiazem, and desacetyldiltiazem were 6.5 +/- 1.4 hours, 9.4 +/- 2.2 hours, and 18 +/- 6.2 hours, respectively. Both N-demethyldiltiazem and diltiazem were eliminated by net secretion, whereas the renal clearance of desacetyldiltiazem did not exceed clearance by filtration. Both N-demethyldiltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem are bound to plasma proteins, with unbound fractions of 0.323 +/- 0.035 and 0.230 +/- 0.021. These values are similar to the unbound fraction of diltiazem (0.254 +/- 0.027). No significant effect of diltiazem on blood pressure or heart rate was noted. However, a prolongation of the PR interval was observed in all six subjects. Furthermore, an apparent clockwise hysteresis in the concentration-effect relationship was found in four of the six subjects. These findings suggest that some form of acute tolerance to the electrophysiologic effect of diltiazem develops, but the results of pharmacodynamic modeling suggest that this is not caused by the antagonistic effects the metabolites.

The pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of atenolol.

A number of studies have demonstrated that lipophilic beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents, eliminated almost exclusively by hepatic metabolism, are stereoselectively metabolized in human beings. Previous studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that pindolol, a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent of intermediate lipophilicity that is eliminated by both hepatic metabolism and renal excretion, is eliminated stereoselectively in the kidney. In the present study we examined the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of atenolol, a hydrophilic cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent that is eliminated almost exclusively by the kidney. A single 100 mg oral dose of racemic atenolol was administered to six healthy adult men. Concentrations of d- and l-atenolol in plasma and urine were measured by a stereospecific HPLC analytic procedure. In each subject the peak concentration of d-atenolol was greater than the peak concentration of l-atenolol (mean +/- SD of 420 +/- 81 ng/ml vs 366 +/- 61 ng/ml; p less than 0.05). The peak concentration of both enantiomers was reached at the same time in each subject (between 2 and 3 hours). The renal clearances of d- and l-atenolol were not significantly different (109.7 +/- 33.5 ml/min vs 112.5 +/- 36.7 ml/min), probably because the major route of renal elimination is glomerular filtration. The half-lives of d- and l-atenolol were not significantly different (mean +/- SD of 4.6 +/- 1.1 hours vs 5.2 +/- 0.9 hours). However, both the AUC and the amount excreted unchanged in the urine in 24 hours Ae [0-24]) were significantly greater for d-atenolol than for l-atenolol (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)